Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice

Atalay, Sonya·2006·The American Indian Quarterly

Abstract

Archaeology includes the study of artifacts and other aspects of material culture but is more importantly about people-understanding people's daily lives, their sense of place in the world, the food they ate, their art, their spirituality, and their political and social organization. In piecing together multiple lines of evidence, including written documents, oral histories, analytical data from artifacts and ecofacts, and a range of regional and local environmental evidence, archaeologists attempt to write the stories of the past. Stated simply, archaeology is one of many tools utilized for understanding the past. However, when placed in its proper historical context, it is clear that the discipline of archaeology was built around and relies upon Western knowledge systems and methodologies, and its practice has a strongly colonial history.' Many archaeologists have come to recognize that archaeology is based on, and generally reflects, the values of Western cultures.2 In privileging the material, scientific, observable world over the spiritual, experiential, and unquantifiable aspects of archaeological sites, ancient peoples, and artifacts, archaeological practice demonstrates that it is solidly grounded in Western ways of categorizing, knowing, and interpreting the world. However, as Indigenous and local groups around the world have demonstrated, it is not only archaeologists who feel stewardship responsibilities toward archaeological materials and locations-many groups hav…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/aiq.2006.0015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archaeology is a product of and remains a tool for settler colonialism.

    “Archaeology is a product of and remains a tool for settler colonialism, often oppressing both people of the past and people in the present, especially Indigenous People, Black People, People of Colour, and LGBTQ2S+ community members.”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006

  • Many archaeologists are applying different ways of knowing to interpret the past, such as Indigenous knowledge systems, Black feminist theory, and Queer theory.

    “Many archaeologists are also applying different ways of knowing to interpret the past, such as Indigenous knowledge systems (Atalay 2006(Atalay , 2008)), Black feminist theory (Battle-Baptiste 2011), and Queer theory (Walley 2019).”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006

  • The project to undo ingrained practices of systemic antiblack racism in archaeology rests on the work of Indigenous scholars and their accomplices who began and continue to fight against injustice within North American archaeology.

    “In gathering at this figurative table, we recognized that the project to undo ingrained practices of systemic antiblack racism rests on the work of Indigenous scholars and their accomplices, who began and continue to fight against injustice within North American archaeology”
  • The literature on decolonization provides some useful starting points, but clear guidance is often abstract and theoretical, with only a few direct actionable items commensurate with the direct authority that archaeological curation repositories within an academic setting can enact.

    “Although the literature on decolonization (e.g., Atalay 2006;Bryant et al. 2017;Lonetree 2012;Schneider and Hayes 2020) certainly provides some useful starting points for thinking about such issues, clear guidance is often in the abstract and theoretical, with only a few direct actionable items (e.g., land return) that are commensurate with the direct authority that archaeological curation reposi”
  • Until very recently, non-Indigenous scholars often considered Indigenous peoples objects of study, and archaeological practices typically prevented descendant communities from ownership of their past and from knowledge making about their ancestors.

    “Until very recently, non-Indigenous scholars often considered Indigenous peoples objects of study, and archaeological practices typically prevented descendant communities from ownership of their past, and from knowledge making about their ancestors (Atalay 2006;Pokotylo and Mason 2010).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Atalay, S.
Venue
The American Indian Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2006
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
280-310
ISSN
1534-1828
Cited by
423
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review