The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice
Abstract
Archaeology includes the study of artifacts and other aspects of material culture but is more importantly about people-understanding people's daily lives, their sense of place in the world, the food they ate, their art, their spirituality, and their political and social organization. In piecing together multiple lines of evidence, including written documents, oral histories, analytical data from artifacts and ecofacts, and a range of regional and local environmental evidence, archaeologists attempt to write the stories of the past. Stated simply, archaeology is one of many tools utilized for understanding the past. However, when placed in its proper historical context, it is clear that the discipline of archaeology was built around and relies upon Western knowledge systems and methodologies, and its practice has a strongly colonial history.' Many archaeologists have come to recognize that archaeology is based on, and generally reflects, the values of Western cultures.2 In privileging the material, scientific, observable world over the spiritual, experiential, and unquantifiable aspects of archaeological sites, ancient peoples, and artifacts, archaeological practice demonstrates that it is solidly grounded in Western ways of categorizing, knowing, and interpreting the world. However, as Indigenous and local groups around the world have demonstrated, it is not only archaeologists who feel stewardship responsibilities toward archaeological materials and locations-many groups hav…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Archaeology is a product of and remains a tool for settler colonialism.
“Archaeology is a product of and remains a tool for settler colonialism, often oppressing both people of the past and people in the present, especially Indigenous People, Black People, People of Colour, and LGBTQ2S+ community members.”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006
Many archaeologists are applying different ways of knowing to interpret the past, such as Indigenous knowledge systems, Black feminist theory, and Queer theory.
“Many archaeologists are also applying different ways of knowing to interpret the past, such as Indigenous knowledge systems (Atalay 2006(Atalay , 2008)), Black feminist theory (Battle-Baptiste 2011), and Queer theory (Walley 2019).”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006
The project to undo ingrained practices of systemic antiblack racism in archaeology rests on the work of Indigenous scholars and their accomplices who began and continue to fight against injustice within North American archaeology.
“In gathering at this figurative table, we recognized that the project to undo ingrained practices of systemic antiblack racism rests on the work of Indigenous scholars and their accomplices, who began and continue to fight against injustice within North American archaeology”
From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006
The literature on decolonization provides some useful starting points, but clear guidance is often abstract and theoretical, with only a few direct actionable items commensurate with the direct authority that archaeological curation repositories within an academic setting can enact.
“Although the literature on decolonization (e.g., Atalay 2006;Bryant et al. 2017;Lonetree 2012;Schneider and Hayes 2020) certainly provides some useful starting points for thinking about such issues, clear guidance is often in the abstract and theoretical, with only a few direct actionable items (e.g., land return) that are commensurate with the direct authority that archaeological curation reposi”
From The NAGPRA Nexus, Institutional Integrity, and the Evolving Role of Archaeological Laboratories (2023) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006
Until very recently, non-Indigenous scholars often considered Indigenous peoples objects of study, and archaeological practices typically prevented descendant communities from ownership of their past and from knowledge making about their ancestors.
“Until very recently, non-Indigenous scholars often considered Indigenous peoples objects of study, and archaeological practices typically prevented descendant communities from ownership of their past, and from knowledge making about their ancestors (Atalay 2006;Pokotylo and Mason 2010).”
From What We See, What We Don’t See: Data Governance, Archaeological Spatial Databases and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Big Data (2020) · cites this paper as Atalay 2006
Citations
Cites
Beyond Racism: Some Opinions about Racialism and American Archaeology
Echo-Hawk, R. C., & Zimmerman, L. J. (2006) · The American Indian Quarterly · doi:10.1353/aiq.2006.0021 · Cited by 42
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T. J., Lippert, D., McGuire, R. H., Nicholas, G. P., Watkins, J. E., & Zimmerman, L. J. (2010) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.228 · Cited by 170
Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities
Colwell, C. (2016) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937 · Cited by 178
“The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter
Flewellen, A. O., Dunnavant, J. P., Odewale, A., Jones, A., Wolde-Michael, T., Crossland, Z., & Franklin, M. (2021) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2021.18 · Cited by 151
The Future is Now: Archaeology and the Eradication of Anti-Blackness
Franklin, M., Dunnavant, J. P., Flewellen, A. O., & Odewale, A. (2020) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-020-00577-1 · Cited by 140
Modeling Métis mobility? Evaluating least cost paths and indigenous landscapes in the Canadian west
Supernant, K. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.006 · Cited by 64
Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America
Laluk, N. C., Montgomery, L. M., Tsosie, R., McCleave, C., Miron, R., Carroll, S. R., Aguilar, J., Thompson, A. B. W., Nelson, P., Sunseri, J., et al. (2022) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2022.59 · Cited by 59
Gupta, N., Blair, S., & Nicholas, R. (2020) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969 · Cited by 58
Flewellen, A. O., Odewale, A., Dunnavant, J., Jones, A., & White, W. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00600-z · Cited by 43
Unearthing Colonial Violence: Griotic Archaeology and Community-Engagement in Guiana
Hartemann, G. O. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00596-6 · Cited by 27
McDavid, C., & Brock, T. P. (2015) · Ethics and Archaeological Praxis · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_11 · Cited by 22
The NAGPRA Nexus, Institutional Integrity, and the Evolving Role of Archaeological Laboratories
Roberts Thompson, A., Thompson, V. D., Garland, C. J., Butler, R. A., deBeaubien, D., Panther, M., Hunt, T., Wendt, L., Fontenot, R., Langley, L., et al. (2023) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2022.43 · Cited by 21
Reilly, M. C. (2022) · Archaeological Dialogues · doi:10.1017/s1380203822000174 · Cited by 20
Collaborative Archaeology to Revitalize an Afro-Ecuadorian Cemetery
Balanzátegui Moreno, D. C. (2018) · Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage · doi:10.1080/21619441.2018.1480117 · Cited by 18
Autoarchaeology at Christiansborg Castle (Ghana): Decolonizing knowledge, pedagogy, and practice
Engmann, R. A. A. (2019) · Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage · doi:10.1080/20518196.2019.1633780 · Cited by 17
Kelvin, L., & Hodgetts, L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.51270/44.1.1 · Cited by 16
Westmont, V. C. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00592-w · Cited by 12
NAGPRA in Archaeological Practice: Implementing Duty of Care
Haas, J. R., Morgan, B., Lofaro, E., Thomas, J.-L., O’Donnell, S., Schreiner, N. M., & Panther, M. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.14 · Cited by 4
Indigenous Peoples, Working with and for
Chirikure, S. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_9 · Cited by 1
Social Movements and Archaeology
Jofré, I. C. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_1795
The Speaking Past: Positioning Oral Traditions in Archaeological Practice
Martindale, A., Bruchac, M., Supernant, K., & Nicholas, G. (2025) · The Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Oral Traditions and Archaeology · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197557686.013.26
Metadata
- Authors
- Atalay, S.
- Venue
- The American Indian Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 280-310
- ISSN
- 1534-1828
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review