Cited by 15EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

Deep learning architecture based on the combination of convolutional and recurrent layers for ERP-based brain-computer interfaces

Santamaría-Vázquez, Eduardo, Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor, Gomez-Pilar, Javier, Hornero, Roberto·2020·IFMBE Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_224

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santamaría-Vázquez, E., Martínez-Cagigal, V., Gomez-Pilar, J., & Hornero, R.
Affiliations
Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Corresponding author
Santamaría-Vázquez, Eduardo
Venue
IFMBE Proceedings
Published
2019-09-25
Pages
1844-1852
ISSN
  • 1433-9277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-0737
OpenAlex
W2976314877
Cited by
15
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
brain-computer interface, event-related potentials, convolutional recurrent neural network, bidirectional LSTM, ERP classification, autism spectrum disorder, spatiotemporal feature extraction, command selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review