Cited by 230EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

Deep learning based on Batch Normalization for P300 signal detection

Liu, Mingfei, Wu, Wei, Gu, Zhenghui, Yu, Zhuliang, Qi, FeiFei, Li, Yuanqing·2018·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.039

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, M., Wu, W., Gu, Z., Yu, Z., Qi, F., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
South China University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Wei
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
275
Pages
288-297
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751159520
Cited by
230
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 11
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403144, 61573152, 61573150, 61633010, 91420302)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
batch normalization, convolutional neural networks, brain-computer interface, P300 speller, oddball paradigm, character recognition, overfitting, rectified linear units, EEG

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review