Cited by 28Artificial Intelligence in LawDigitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Artificial Intelligence and Legal Tech: Challenges to the Rule of Law

Buchholtz, Gabriele·2020·Regulating Artificial Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchholtz, G.
Affiliations
Bucerius Law School (DE)
Corresponding author
Buchholtz, Gabriele
Venue
Regulating Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-11-30
Pages
175-198
OpenAlex
W2990172029
Cited by
27
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
25.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence, legal technology, rule of law, accountability, fairness, non-discrimination, due process, liability, fundamental legal principles, algorithmic governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review