The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community-Based and Participatory Praxis as Decolonizing Archaeological Methods and the Betrayal of New Research
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rizvi documents how economic development and social empowerment projects often implicate archaeological remains and how such projects are composed of transnational workforces.
“Rizvi (2020), among others (MacEachern 2010, Meskell 2018), documents how economic development and social empowerment projects often implicate archaeological remains and how such projects are composed of transnational workforces.”
From The Work of Boundaries: Critical Cartographies and the Archaeological Record of the Relatively Recent Past (2022) · cites this paper as Rizvi 2020
Citations
Cites
Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics
Richardson, L.-J., & Almansa-Sánchez, J. (2015) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599 · Cited by 140
Lyons, N. (2014) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.183 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Abu-Khawajah, S. (2014). ‘They are hiding it … Why do they hide it? From Whom, and for Whom?’: Community heritage at work in the post-colonial context of Jordan. In S. Thomas & J. Lea (Eds.), Public participation in archaeology (pp. 149–160). Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer. · DOI
- Ahmad, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-Coloniality. London: Routledge.
- Atalay, S. (2006). Decolonizing archaeology. American Indian Quarterly, 30(3 & 4), 269–279. · DOI
- Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Chadha, A. (2010). The Archaeological Survey of India and the Science of Postcolonial Archaeology. In J. Lydon & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.),. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology World Archaeological Congress Research Handbooks (pp. 227–233). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
- Dave, N. (2012). Queer Activism in India: A Story in the Anthropology of Ethics. Durham and. London: Duke University Press. · DOI
- Gullapalli, P. (2008). Heterogeneous encounters: Colonial histories and archaeological experiences. In M. Liebmann & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique (pp. 35–52). Lanham: Altamira Press.
- Haber, A. (2012). Un-disciplining archaeology. Archaeologies, 8(1), 55–66. · DOI
- hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End Press.
- Ibrahim, A. (in review). The role of museums, design accessibility and community concerns: A case study of State Bank of Pakistan Museum and Art Gallery. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage.
- Jamir, T., & Vasa, D. (2008). Archaeology of local cultures: New findings and interpretations in Nagaland. In M. Oppitz, T. Kaiser, A. v. Stockhausen, & M. Wettstein (Eds.), Naga identities: Changing local cultures in the northeast of India (pp. 323–339). Snoeck Publishers: Gent.
- Kersel, M., & Chesson, M. (2013). Tomato season in the Ghor es-Safi: A lesson in community archaeology. Near Eastern Archaeology, 76(3), 159–165. · DOI
- Kuwanwisiwma, L. J. (2008). Collaboration means equality, respect, and reciprocity: A conversation about archaeology and the Hopi tribe. In C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh & T. J. Ferguson (Eds.), Collaboration in archaeological practice: Engaging descendant communities (pp. 151–169). Lanham: AltaMira Press.
- Lorenzon, M., & Zermani, I. (2016). Common ground: Community archaeology in Egypt, interaction between population and cultural heritage. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 3(3), 183–199. · DOI
- Marshall, Y. (2002). What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 34(2), 211–219. · DOI · Paper page
- McDavid, C. (2007). Beyond strategy and good intentions: Archaeology, race, and white privilege. In B. Little & P. Shackel (Eds.), Archaeology as a tool of civic engagement (pp. 67–88). Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
- McDavid, C., Rizvi, U. Z., & Smith, L. (2016). Community archaeology and heritage in Africa: Conversations inspired by a workshop. In P. Schmidt & I. Pikirayi (Eds.), Community archaeology and heritage in Africa (pp. 250–269). London: Routledge Press.
- Mehari, A., & Ryano, K. P. (2016). Maasai people and Oldupai (Olduvai) gorge: Looking for sustainable people-centred approaches and practices. In P. Schmidt & I. Pikirayi (Eds.), Community archaeology and heritage in Africa (pp. 21–45). London: Routledge Press.
- Mignolo, W. (2002). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96. · DOI
- Nagar, R. (2014). Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms Across Scholarship and Activism. Urbana/Chicago/Springfield: University of Illinois Press. · DOI
- Nandy, A. (2001). Time warps: The insistent politics of silent and evasive pasts. Delhi: Permanent Blacki.
- Piccini, A., & Schaepe, D. M. (2014). The messy business of archaeology as participatory local knowledge: A conversation between the Stó:lō Nation and Knowle West. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien D’Archéologie, 38(2), 466–495.
- Rizvi, U. Z. (2006). Accounting for multiple desires: Decolonizing methodologies, archaeology and the public interest. India Review, 5(3–4), 394–416. · DOI
- Rizvi, U. Z. (2008). Decolonizing methodologies as strategies of practice: Operationalizing the postcolonial critique in the archaeology of Rajasthan. In M. Liebmann & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique (pp. 109–127). Lanham: Altamira Press.
- Rizvi, U. Z. (2015). Decolonizing archaeology: On the global heritage of epistemic laziness. In O. Kholeif (Ed.), Two days after forever: A reader on the choreography of time (pp. 154–163). Berlin: Sternberg Press.
- Rizvi, U. Z. (2016). Decolonization as care. In C. F. Strauss & A. P. Pais (Eds.), Slow reader: A resource for design thinking and practice (pp. 85–95). Amsterdam: Valiz Publishers.
- Ross, A., Ulm, S., & Tobane, B. (2013). Gummingurru: A community archaeology knowledge journey. Australian Archaeology, 76, 62–68. · DOI
- Shepherd, N. (2014). Undisciplining archaeological ethics. In A. Haber & N. Shepherd (Eds.), After ethics: Ancestral voices and post-disciplinary worlds in archaeology (pp. 11–26). New York: Springer.
- Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing Posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47. · DOI
- Swarr, A. L., & Nagar, R. (Eds.). (2010). Critical transnational feminist praxis. Albany: SUNY Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hauser, M. W. (2022) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110141 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizvi, U. Z.
- Venue
- Archaeologies of the Heart
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 83-96
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review