Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community-Based and Participatory Praxis as Decolonizing Archaeological Methods and the Betrayal of New Research

Rizvi, Uzma Z.·2020·Archaeologies of the Heart

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-36350-5_6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rizvi documents how economic development and social empowerment projects often implicate archaeological remains and how such projects are composed of transnational workforces.

    “Rizvi (2020), among others (MacEachern 2010, Meskell 2018), documents how economic development and social empowerment projects often implicate archaeological remains and how such projects are composed of transnational workforces.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Abu-Khawajah, S. (2014). ‘They are hiding it … Why do they hide it? From Whom, and for Whom?’: Community heritage at work in the post-colonial context of Jordan. In S. Thomas & J. Lea (Eds.), Public participation in archaeology (pp. 149–160). Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer. · DOI
  2. Ahmad, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-Coloniality. London: Routledge.
  3. Atalay, S. (2006). Decolonizing archaeology. American Indian Quarterly, 30(3 & 4), 269–279. · DOI
  4. Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  5. Chadha, A. (2010). The Archaeological Survey of India and the Science of Postcolonial Archaeology. In J. Lydon & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.),. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology World Archaeological Congress Research Handbooks (pp. 227–233). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  6. Dave, N. (2012). Queer Activism in India: A Story in the Anthropology of Ethics. Durham and. London: Duke University Press. · DOI
  7. Gullapalli, P. (2008). Heterogeneous encounters: Colonial histories and archaeological experiences. In M. Liebmann & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique (pp. 35–52). Lanham: Altamira Press.
  8. Haber, A. (2012). Un-disciplining archaeology. Archaeologies, 8(1), 55–66. · DOI
  9. hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End Press.
  10. Ibrahim, A. (in review). The role of museums, design accessibility and community concerns: A case study of State Bank of Pakistan Museum and Art Gallery. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage.
  11. Jamir, T., & Vasa, D. (2008). Archaeology of local cultures: New findings and interpretations in Nagaland. In M. Oppitz, T. Kaiser, A. v. Stockhausen, & M. Wettstein (Eds.), Naga identities: Changing local cultures in the northeast of India (pp. 323–339). Snoeck Publishers: Gent.
  12. Kersel, M., & Chesson, M. (2013). Tomato season in the Ghor es-Safi: A lesson in community archaeology. Near Eastern Archaeology, 76(3), 159–165. · DOI
  13. Kuwanwisiwma, L. J. (2008). Collaboration means equality, respect, and reciprocity: A conversation about archaeology and the Hopi tribe. In C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh & T. J. Ferguson (Eds.), Collaboration in archaeological practice: Engaging descendant communities (pp. 151–169). Lanham: AltaMira Press.
  14. Lorenzon, M., & Zermani, I. (2016). Common ground: Community archaeology in Egypt, interaction between population and cultural heritage. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 3(3), 183–199. · DOI
  15. Marshall, Y. (2002). What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 34(2), 211–219. · DOI · Paper page
  16. McDavid, C. (2007). Beyond strategy and good intentions: Archaeology, race, and white privilege. In B. Little & P. Shackel (Eds.), Archaeology as a tool of civic engagement (pp. 67–88). Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
  17. McDavid, C., Rizvi, U. Z., & Smith, L. (2016). Community archaeology and heritage in Africa: Conversations inspired by a workshop. In P. Schmidt & I. Pikirayi (Eds.), Community archaeology and heritage in Africa (pp. 250–269). London: Routledge Press.
  18. Mehari, A., & Ryano, K. P. (2016). Maasai people and Oldupai (Olduvai) gorge: Looking for sustainable people-centred approaches and practices. In P. Schmidt & I. Pikirayi (Eds.), Community archaeology and heritage in Africa (pp. 21–45). London: Routledge Press.
  19. Mignolo, W. (2002). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96. · DOI
  20. Nagar, R. (2014). Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms Across Scholarship and Activism. Urbana/Chicago/Springfield: University of Illinois Press. · DOI
  21. Nandy, A. (2001). Time warps: The insistent politics of silent and evasive pasts. Delhi: Permanent Blacki.
  22. Piccini, A., & Schaepe, D. M. (2014). The messy business of archaeology as participatory local knowledge: A conversation between the Stó:lō Nation and Knowle West. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien D’Archéologie, 38(2), 466–495.
  23. Rizvi, U. Z. (2006). Accounting for multiple desires: Decolonizing methodologies, archaeology and the public interest. India Review, 5(3–4), 394–416. · DOI
  24. Rizvi, U. Z. (2008). Decolonizing methodologies as strategies of practice: Operationalizing the postcolonial critique in the archaeology of Rajasthan. In M. Liebmann & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique (pp. 109–127). Lanham: Altamira Press.
  25. Rizvi, U. Z. (2015). Decolonizing archaeology: On the global heritage of epistemic laziness. In O. Kholeif (Ed.), Two days after forever: A reader on the choreography of time (pp. 154–163). Berlin: Sternberg Press.
  26. Rizvi, U. Z. (2016). Decolonization as care. In C. F. Strauss & A. P. Pais (Eds.), Slow reader: A resource for design thinking and practice (pp. 85–95). Amsterdam: Valiz Publishers.
  27. Ross, A., Ulm, S., & Tobane, B. (2013). Gummingurru: A community archaeology knowledge journey. Australian Archaeology, 76, 62–68. · DOI
  28. Shepherd, N. (2014). Undisciplining archaeological ethics. In A. Haber & N. Shepherd (Eds.), After ethics: Ancestral voices and post-disciplinary worlds in archaeology (pp. 11–26). New York: Springer.
  29. Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing Posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47. · DOI
  30. Swarr, A. L., & Nagar, R. (Eds.). (2010). Critical transnational feminist praxis. Albany: SUNY Press.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rizvi, U. Z.
Venue
Archaeologies of the Heart
Published
2020
Pages
83-96
Cited by
17
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review