Cited by 31Speech and dialogue systemsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface Design

Conversational Web Interaction: Proposal of a Dialog-Based Natural Language Interaction Paradigm for the Web

Open access
Baez, Marcos, Daniel, Florian, Casati, Fabio·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_7

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chatbots have been suggested as accessible interactive systems for visually impaired users, as conversational support for users with special needs, and to support youth engagement in societal issues.

    “Chatbots have been suggested as accessible interactive systems for visually impaired in need of an easily navigable user interface [7], as conversational support for users with special needs [19], and to support youth to engage in societal issues [110].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baez, M., Daniel, F., & Casati, F.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
94-110
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2999998026
Cited by
31
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
chatbots, speech interfaces, reference architecture, screen readers, visually impaired users, web accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review