Cited by 39Speech and dialogue systemsUsability and User Interface DesignMobile and Web Applications

Firefox Voice: An Open and Extensible Voice Assistant Built Upon the Web

Open access
Cambre, Julia, Williams, Alex C, Razi, Afsaneh, Bicking, Ian, Wallin, Abraham, Tsai, Janice, Kulkarni, Chinmay, Kaye, Jofish·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Voice assistants are fundamentally changing the way we access information. However, voice assistants still leverage little about the web beyond simple search results. We introduce Firefox Voice, a novel voice assistant built on the open web ecosystem with an aim to expand access to information available via voice. Firefox Voice is a browser extension that enables users to use their voice to perform actions such as setting timers, navigating the web, and reading a webpage’s content aloud. Through an iterative development process and use by over 12,000 active users, we find that users see voice as a way to accomplish certain browsing tasks efficiently, but struggle with discovering functionality and frequently discontinue use. We conclude by describing how Firefox Voice enables the development of novel, open web-powered voice-driven experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3411764.3445409

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Talk2Care is intentionally designed to not provide health advice due to the concern about AI reliability in healthcare.

    “Talk2Care is intentionally designed to not provide health advice due to the concern about AI reliability in healthcare [24,55,82].”

    From Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 2.1 discusses general voice-assistant limitations, including speech-recognition errors, while Section 3.3.1 discusses privacy concerns. Neither addresses Talk2Care, its decision not to provide health advice, or AI reliability in healthcare; searches for those topics found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rishabh Mehrotra, A Hassan Awadallah, and Imed Zitouni. 2017. Hey Cortana! Exploring the Use Cases of a Desktop Based Digital Assistant. In SIGIR 1st Interna- tional Workshop on Conversational Approaches to Information Retrieval (CAIR'17). SIGIR 1st International Workshop on Conversational Approaches to Information Retrieval (CAIR'17), 1-5. https://rishabhmehrotra.com/CAIR17-cortana.pdf
  2. Randy Pausch and James H Leatherby. 1991. An Empirical Study: Adding Voice Input to a Graphical Editor. In Journal of the American Voice Input/Output Society. Citeseer.
  3. Rachael Tatman and Conner Kasten. 2017. Efects of Talker Dialect, Gender & Race on Accuracy of Bing Speech and YouTube Automatic Captions. In Proc. Interspeech 2017. INTERSPEECH, 934-938. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/ Interspeech_2017/pdfs/1746.PDF

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cambre, J., Williams, A. C., Razi, A., Bicking, I., Wallin, A., Tsai, J., Kulkarni, C., & Kaye, J.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Emerging Technologies Mozilla, United States
  • Mozilla, United States
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-05-06
Pages
1-18
OpenAlex
W3160029355
Cited by
39
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of California, Santa Cruz
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
Keywords
voice assistants, browser extension, web accessibility, voice user interface, web browsing, text-to-speech, open web, user experience, product discontinuation, Firefox

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review