Cited by 42Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Recommender Systems and TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Personalising Explainable Recommendations: Literature and Conceptualisation

Open access
Naiseh, Mohammad, Jiang, Nan, Ma, Jianbing, Ali, Raian·2020·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-45691-7_49

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Explanation should be adapted to users' level of knowledge and expertise in a given Human-AI collaborative decision-making task.

    “Also, our previous literature review revealed that explanation shall be adapted to users’ level of knowledge and expertise in a given Human-AI collaborative decision-making task [56].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hind, M., Wei, D., Campbell, M., Codella, N.C., Dhurandhar, A., Mojsilović, A., Natesan Ramamurthy, K., Varshney, K.R.: Ted: Teaching ai to explain its decisions. In: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. pp. 123-129. ACM (2019)
  2. Kroll, J.A., Barocas, S., Felten, E.W., Reidenberg, J.R., Robinson, D.G., Yu, H.: Accountable algorithms. U. Pa. L. Rev. 165, 633 (2016)
  3. Lamche, B., Adıgüzel, U., Wörndl, W.: Interactive explanations in mobile shop- ping recommender systems. In: Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems. p. 14 (2014)
  4. Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., Vinck, P.: Fair, transparent, and ac- countable algorithmic decision-making processes. Philosophy & Technology 31(4), 611-627 (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naiseh, M., Jiang, N., Ma, J., & Ali, R.
Affiliations
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
  • Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN)
  • Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Corresponding author
Naiseh, Mohammad
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2020
Pages
518-533
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W3033496024
Cited by
42
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
explainable recommendation, personalization, trust in AI, information overload, user experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review