PreprintCited by 130Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics

Brito, Richard, Cardoso, Vitor, Pani, Paolo·2020·Lecture Notes in Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-46622-0

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brito, R., Cardoso, V., & Pani, P.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Physics
Published
2020
ISSN
  • 0075-8450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-6361
OpenAlex
W4288084071
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
9.26
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
superradiance, black hole physics, Penrose process, black hole bomb, Hawking radiation, dark matter searches, beyond the Standard Model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review