Cited by 94Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (CaPTk): Technical Overview

Open access
Pati, Sarthak, Singh, Ashish, Rathore, Saima, Gastounioti, Aimilia, Bergman, Mark, Ngo, Phuc, Ha, Sung Min, Bounias, Dimitrios +17 more·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of the technical specifications and architecture of the Ca ncer imaging P henomics T ool k it (CaPTk www.cbica.upenn.edu/captk), a cross-platform, open-source, easy-to-use, and extensible software platform for analyzing 2D and 3D images, currently focusing on radiographic scans of brain, breast, and lung cancer. The primary aim of this platform is to enable swift and efficient translation of cutting-edge academic research into clinically useful tools relating to clinical quantification, analysis, predictive modeling, decision-making, and reporting workflow. CaPTk builds upon established open-source software toolkits, such as the Insight Toolkit (ITK) and OpenCV, to bring together advanced computational functionality. This functionality describes specialized, as well as general-purpose, image analysis algorithms developed during active multi-disciplinary collaborative research studies to address real clinical requirements. The target audience of CaPTk consists of both computational scientists and clinical experts. For the former it provides i) an efficient image viewer offering the ability of integrating new algorithms, and ii) a library of readily-available clinically-relevant algorithms, allowing batch-processing of multiple subjects. For the latter it facilitates the use of complex algorithms for clinically-relevant studies through a user-friendly interface, eliminating the prerequisite of a substantial computational background. CaPTk's long-term goal is to provide widely-used technology to make use of advanced quantitative imaging analytics in cancer prediction, diagnosis and prognosis, leading toward a better understanding of the biological mechanisms of cancer development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-46643-5_38

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BraTS challenge provides the largest publicly available and manually-curated mpMRI dataset of diffuse glioma patients and a harmonized preprocessing pipeline to handle inter-site acquisition protocol differences.

    “The BraTS challenge35–38, seeking methodological advancements in the domain of neuro-oncology, has been providing the community with (i) the largest publicly available and manually-curated mpMRI dataset of diffuse glioma patients (an example of which is illustrated in Fig. 1b), and (ii) a harmonized preprocessing pipeline51,70,71 to handle differences in inter-site acquisition protocols.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pati, S., Singh, A., Rathore, S., Gastounioti, A., Bergman, M., Ngo, P., Ha, S. M., Bounias, D., Minock, J., Murphy, G., Li, H., Bhattarai, A., Wolf, A., Sridaran, P., Kalarot, R., Akbari, H., Sotiras, A., Thakur, S. P., Verma, R., Shinohara, R. T., Yushkevich, P., Fan, Y., Kontos, D., Davatzikos, C., & Bakas, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Bakas, Spyridon
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Volume
11993
Pages
380-394
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3026062881
Cited by
94
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
FWCI
14.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od023495-01, UL1TR001878)
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA189523)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS042645)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
medical image analysis software, brain cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, radiography, Insight Toolkit, OpenCV, image viewer, clinical translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review