Cited by 51Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

The federated tumor segmentation (FeTS) tool: an open-source solution to further solid tumor research

Open access
Pati, Sarthak, Baid, Ujjwal, Edwards, Brandon, Sheller, Micah J, Foley, Patrick, Anthony Reina, G, Thakur, Siddhesh, Sako, Chiharu +6 more·2022·Physics in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

Objective. De-centralized data analysis becomes an increasingly preferred option in the healthcare domain, as it alleviates the need for sharing primary patient data across collaborating institutions. This highlights the need for consistent harmonized data curation, pre-processing, and identification of regions of interest based on uniform criteria. Approach. Towards this end, this manuscript describes the Fe derated T umor S egmentation (FeTS) tool, in terms of software architecture and functionality. Main results. The primary aim of the FeTS tool is to facilitate this harmonized processing and the generation of gold standard reference labels for tumor sub-compartments on brain magnetic resonance imaging, and further enable federated training of a tumor sub-compartment delineation model across numerous sites distributed across the globe, without the need to share patient data. Significance. Building upon existing open-source tools such as the Insight Toolkit and Qt, the FeTS tool is designed to enable training deep learning models targeting tumor delineation in either centralized or federated settings. The target audience of the FeTS tool is primarily the computational researcher interested in developing federated learning models, and interested in joining a global federation towards this effort. The tool is open sourced at https://github.com/FETS-AI/Front-End .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9449

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Varying characteristics of the multi-parametric MRI data due to scanner hardware and acquisition protocol differences were handled at each collaborating site via established harmonized preprocessing pipelines.

    “Moreover, varying characteristics of the mpMRI data due to scanner hardware and acquisition protocol differences33,34 were handled at each collaborating site via established harmonized preprocessing pipelines35–39.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pati, S., Baid, U., Edwards, B., Sheller, M. J., Foley, P., Anthony Reina, G., Thakur, S., Sako, C., Bilello, M., Davatzikos, C., Martin, J., Shah, P., Menze, B., & Bakas, S.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
  • Intel Corporation
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Bakas, Spyridon
Venue
Physics in Medicine & Biology
Published
2022-10-12
Volume
67
Issue
20
Pages
204002
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W4296794855
Cited by
51
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA242871)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
federated learning, tumor segmentation, brain MRI, solid tumors, data privacy, data harmonization, open source software, Insight Toolkit, deep learning training
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasms, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review