The DOI matches its Crossref record; 215 of the 215 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Tumor Spheroid Models for In Vitro Therapeutic Screening of Nanoparticles
Abstract
The anticancer activity of compounds and nanoparticles is most often determined in the cell monolayer. However, three-dimensional (3D) systems, such as tumor spheroids, are more representing the natural tumor microenvironment. They have been shown to have higher invasiveness and resistance to cytotoxic agents and radiotherapy compared to cells growing in 2D monolayer. Furthermore, to improve the prediction of clinical efficacy of drugs, in the past decades, even more sophisticated systems, such as multicellular 3D cultures, closely representing natural tumor microenvironment have been developed. Those cultures are formed from either cell lines or patient-derived tumor cells. Such models are very attractive and could improve the selection of tested materials for clinical trials avoiding unnecessary expensive tests in vivo. The microenvironment in tumor spheroids is different, and those differences or the interaction between several cell populations may contribute to different tumor response to the treatment. Also, different types of nanoparticles may have different behavior in 3D models, depending on their nature, physicochemical properties, the presence of targeting ligands on the surface, etc. Therefore, it is very important to understand in which cases which type of tumor spheroid is more suitable for testing specific types of nanoparticles, which conditions should be used, and which analytical method should be applied.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Multicellular tumor spheroids are appropriate systems for modeling tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental complexity [204,205,206].”
From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [206]
In the citing paper
“Penetration is governed by the physicochemical characteristics of the drug or particle—including size, surface charge, shape, lipophilicity, and acid dissociation constant—as well as by the structural and biochemical properties of the spheroid, such as ECM density, extracellular pH gradients, and compactness of the cellular arrangement [99,206,290].”
From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [206]
In the citing paper
“Prolonged treatments may result in partial disintegration of the spheroid structure, complicating morphological evaluation and making longitudinal comparisons unreliable [206].”
From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [206]
Citations
Cites
Items 201–215 of 215
Yoshida, T., Okuyama, H., Endo, H., & Inoue, M. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7234-0_12 · Cited by 24
Herrera-Martínez, A. D., van den Dungen, R., Dogan, F., van Koetsveld, P. M., Culler, M. D., de Herder, W. W., Luque, R. M., Feelders, R. A., & Hofland, L. J. (2019) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1530/erc-19-0086 · Cited by 23
Ferrante, A., Rainaldi, G., Indovina, P., Indovina, P. L., & Santini, M. T. (2006) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.28.1.111 · Cited by 21
ZHAO, C., Setrerrahmane, S., & Han-mei, X. (2015) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.2015.4163 · Cited by 21
Zhao, W., Luo, Y., Li, B., & Zhang, T. (2016) · Molecular Medicine Reports · doi:10.3892/mmr.2016.5524 · Cited by 21
Garcı́a, I., Henriksen‐Lacey, M., Calvo, J., de Aberasturi, D. J., Paz, M. M., & Liz‐Marzán, L. M. (2018) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00898 · Cited by 20
Bonafè, F., Pazzini, C., Marchionni, S., Guarnieri, C., & Muscari, C. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijms.28135 · Cited by 18
Pampaloni, F., Stelzer, E. H. K., Leicht, S., & Marcello, M. (2010) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201000236 · Cited by 17
Inventions and Innovations in Preclinical Platforms for Cancer Research
Moshksayan, K., Kashaninejad, N., & Saidi, M. S. (2018) · Inventions · doi:10.3390/inventions3030043 · Cited by 12
The effect of shear flow on nanoparticle agglomeration and deposition inin vitrodynamic flow models
Grabinski, C. M., Sharma, M., Maurer, E. I., et al. (2015) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1018978 · Cited by 11
Jou, C., Chen, W., Yang, M., et al. (2007) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.1020 · Cited by 11
A novel grignard addition to a coumarin
Razdan, R. K., Thompson, W. R., Pars, H. G., et al. (1967) · Tetrahedron Letters · doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(01)89853-1 · Cited by 11
Baye, J., Galvin, C. J., & Shen, A. Q. (2017) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-017-0200-5 · Cited by 11
Revealing 3D Ultrastructure and Morphology of Stem Cell Spheroids by Electron Microscopy
Jaroš, J., Petrov, M., Tesařová, M., & Hampl, A. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7021-6_30 · Cited by 9
Electrochemical mapping of oxygenation in the three-dimensional multicellular tumour hemi-spheroid
Sheth, D., & Gratzl, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0647 · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shah, S., & D’Souza, G. G. M. (2025) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells14100732 · Cited by 83
“Multicellular tumor spheroids are appropriate systems for modeling tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental complexity [204–206].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Daunys, S., Janonienė, A., Januškevičienė, I., Paškevičiūtė, M., & Petrikaitė, V.
- Affiliations
- Vilnius University (LT)
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
- Venue
- Advances in experimental medicine and biology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 1295
- Pages
- 243-270
- ISSN
- 0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8019
- OpenAlex
- W3127899697
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 215
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- tumor spheroids, 3D tumor models, nanoparticles, anticancer drug screening, tumor microenvironment, patient-derived tumor cells, nanoparticle physicochemical properties, drug resistance, in vitro tumor model
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Spheroids, Cellular, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, Nanoparticles, Tumor Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review