Cited by 1Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Assessment and ImprovementEducational Research and Methods

Overview

Maxwell, Graham S.·2021·˜The œenabling power of assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-63539-8_1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Challenges to educational change may include limited time, competing professional demands, or insufficient incentives for innovation.

    “Consistent with research on educational change (Fullan, 2015; Maxwell, 2021), challenges may include limited time, competing professional demands, or insufficient incentives for innovation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Authors
Maxwell, G. S.
Affiliations
Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, Graham S.
Venue
˜The œenabling power of assessment
Published
2021
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 2198-2643 (ISSN-L)
  • 2198-2651
OpenAlex
W4238579054
Cited by
1
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The enabling power of assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
data-driven instruction, student learning, educational assessment, evidence synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review