Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,524

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 203 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Ophthalmology

Open access
Wang, Zhaoran, Keane, Pearse A., Chiang, Michael, Cheung, Carol Y., Wong, Tien Yin, Ting, Daniel Shu Wei·2022·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) based on deep learning (DL) has sparked tremendous global interest in recent years. DL has been widely adopted in image recognition, speech recognition and natural language processing, but is only beginning to impact on healthcare. In ophthalmology, DL has been applied to fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography and visual fields, achieving robust classification performance in the detection of diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity, the glaucoma-like disc, macular oedema and age-related macular degeneration. DL in ocular imaging may be used in conjunction with telemedicine as a possible solution to screen, diagnose and monitor major eye diseases for patients in primary care and community settings. Nonetheless, there are also potential challenges with DL application in ophthalmology, including clinical and technical challenges, explainability of the algorithm results, medicolegal issues, and physician and patient acceptance of the AI ‘black-box’ algorithms. DL could potentially revolutionise how ophthalmology is practised in the future. This review provides a summary of the state-of-the-art DL systems described for ophthalmic applications, potential challenges in clinical deployment and the path forward.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-64573-1_200

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 203 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, et al. editors. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems; 2014.
  2. England N. The NHS constitution. The NHS belongs to us all. London: NHS England; 2015.
  3. Organization WH. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening: web supplement 2: summary of findings and GRADE tables. World Health Organization; 2019.
  4. Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L, Campbell JP, Lee AY, Raman R, et al. Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(2):167–75. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,524

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Keane, P. A., Chiang, M., Cheung, C. Y., Wong, T. Y., & Ting, D. S. W.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Published
2022
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
1519-1552
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898192966
Cited by
1,524
References
203
FWCI
379.80
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Ophthalmology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-64573-1_200
The paper
Wang, Z., Keane, P. A., Chiang, M., Cheung, C. Y., Wong, T. Y., & Ting, D. S. W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Ophthalmology. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64573-1_200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.