CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Generalizability Theory

Medvedev, Oleg N., Siegert, Richard J.·2022·Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_5-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_5-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactions between an individual's trait and assessment occasions represent an individual's state, which is a dynamic aspect associated with a construct.

    “Usually, interactions between an individual's trait and assessment occasions represent an individual's state, which is a dynamic aspect associated with a construct (Medvedev & Siegert, 2022).”

    From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Medvedev & Siegert, 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medvedev, O. N., & Siegert, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Medvedev, Oleg N.
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2022
Pages
1-12
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_5-1
OpenAlex
W4205576037
Cited by
8
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.68
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
generalizability theory, mindfulness, test-retest reliability, measurement error variance, true score variance, reliability statistics, validity, self-compassion, stress, depression, schizophrenia, traumatic brain injury, mindfulness assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review