Cited by 28Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Distinguishing transient versus stable aspects of depression in New Zealand Pacific Island children using Generalizability Theory

Open access
Paterson, Janis, Medvedev, Oleg N., Sumich, Alexander, Tautolo, El-Shadan, Krägeloh, Christian U., Sisk, Rose, McNamara, Robert K., Berk, Michael +2 more·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The distinction between temporary versus enduring or state/trait aspects of depression is important. More precise distinction would improve understanding of the aetiology of depression and those aspects most amenable to intervention thus identifying more homogeneous, dynamic targets for clinical trials. Generalizability Theory has been proposed as useful for disentangling state and trait components of psychopathology.Methods We applied Generalizability Theory to determine the relative contributions of temporary and enduring aspects of depression in a widely used screening measure of depression the - 10-item Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-10; Kovacs, 1985). Participants were children of Pacific Island descent living in New Zealand (n = 668). Data were collected at ages - 9, 11, and 14 years.Results The CDI-10 demonstrated acceptable generalizability across occasions (G = 0.79) with about one third of variance in total scores attributed to temporary and two thirds to more enduring aspects of depression. There were no other significant sources of error variance. Two items were identified as more sensitive than the remaining eight to more dynamic symptoms.Limitations Studies with briefer test-retest intervals are warranted. Use of this Pacific Island cohort limits generalizability of findings to other cultures and ethnicities. No data were collected on whether participants had received intervention for depression.Conclusions While the CDI-10 reliably measures both stable and transient aspects of depression in children, the scale does not permit clear distinction between them. We advocate application of Generalizability Theory for developing state/trait depression measures and determining which existing measures are most suitable for capturing modifiable features of depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.075

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relative value of person x occasion interaction is indicative of a scale's sensitivity to measure individual states.

    “The relative value of this interaction is also indicative of a scale's sensitivity to measure individual states (Paterson etal., 2017).”

    From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Paterson et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paterson, J., Medvedev, O. N., Sumich, A., Tautolo, E.-S., Krägeloh, C. U., Sisk, R., McNamara, R. K., Berk, M., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Siegert, Richard J.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
227
Pages
698-704
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770032405
Cited by
28
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society of New Zealand Catalyst (16-AUT-024-CSG)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1059660)
  • Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (CONT-33797-HASTR-AIT)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
Children's Depression Inventory, generalizability theory, test-retest reliability, depression screening, measurement error variance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Pacific Islands, Personality Inventory, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review