Cited by 134Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Digitalization, Law, and Regulation

A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society

Floridi, Luciano, Cowls, Josh·2021·Philosophical Studies Series

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_2

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Floridi's framework for the ethical use of AI, proposing five core principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice and explicability), is referred to by most national policies on AI as a foundation.

    “Floridi (2021)'s framework for the ethical use of AI, which proposed the 5 core principles of 'beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice and explicability' , is referred to by most national policies on AI as a foundation to further develop on.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
Philosophical Studies Series
Published
2021
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 0921-8599 (ISSN-L)
  • 2542-8349
OpenAlex
W4231586238
Cited by
134
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
81.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical studies series (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N023013/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
AI ethics, beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, explainability, accountability, intelligibility, bioethics, societal impact of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review