The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Floridi (2021)'s framework for the ethical use of AI, which proposed the 5 core principles of 'beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice and explicability' , is referred to by most national policies on AI as a foundation to further develop on.”
From A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning (2023) · cites this paper as Floridi, 2021
Citations
Cites
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE
TURING, A. M. (1950) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.236.433 · Cited by 10,290
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774
Self-citationThe grand challenges of Science Robotics
Yang, G.-Z., Bellingham, J., Dupont, P. E., Fischer, P., Floridi, L., Full, R., Jacobstein, N., Kumar, V., McNutt, M., Merrifield, R., et al. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650 · Cited by 1,177
Self-citationFloridi, L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001 · Cited by 727
Self-citationTranslating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical
Floridi, L. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x · Cited by 524
Self-citationRegulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-04602-6 · Cited by 209
Self-citationWhat the Near Future of Artificial Intelligence Could Be
Floridi, L. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00345-y · Cited by 191
Self-citationMorley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3830348 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hagendorff, T. 2019. The ethics of AI ethics—An evaluation of guidelines. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03425 · arXiv
- McCarthy, J., M.L. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C.E. Shannon. 2006. A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine 27 (4): 12. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904. · DOI
- The IEEE Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. 2017. Ethically aligned design, v2. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 · Cited by 1,577
An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2022.3194503 · Cited by 649
From ethical AI frameworks to tools: a review of approaches
Prem, E. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00258-9 · Cited by 292
An AI-based decision support system for predicting mental health disorders
Tutun, S., Johnson, M. E., Ahmed, A., Albizri, A., Irgil, S., Yesilkaya, I., Ucar, E. N., Sengun, T., & Harfouche, A. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10282-5 · Cited by 177
Lukyanenko, R., Maass, W., & Storey, V. C. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00605-4 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Floridi, L., & Cowls, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Floridi, Luciano
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies Series
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 5-17
- ISSN
- 0921-8599 (ISSN-L)
- 2542-8349
- OpenAlex
- W4231586238
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 81.31
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical studies series (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N023013/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- AI ethics, beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, explainability, accountability, intelligibility, bioethics, societal impact of AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review