CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities

Lukyanenko, Roman, Maass, Wolfgang, Storey, Veda C.·2022·Electronic Markets
DOI 10.1007/s12525-022-00605-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12525-022-00605-4

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 209

  1. Abdul, A., Vermeulen, J., Wang, D., Lim, B. Y., & Kankanhalli, M. (2018). Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: An HCI research agenda. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174156 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Abraham, R., & Ueda, Y. (2000). The chaos avant-garde: Memories of the early days of chaos theory. World Scientific. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=olJqDQAAQBAJ · DOI
  3. Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661 · DOI
  4. Ackoff, R. L., & Gharajedaghi, J. (1996). Reflections on systems and their models. Systems Research, 13(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1735(199603)13:13.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  5. Adamczyk, W. B., Monasterio, L., & Fochezatto, A. (2021). Automation in the future of public sector employment: The case of Brazilian Federal Government. Technology in Society, 67, 101722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101722 · DOI
  6. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
  7. Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235–251). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50022-X · DOI
  8. Alfonseca, M., Cebrian, M., Anta, A. F., Coviello, L., Abeliuk, A., & Rahwan, I. (2021). Superintelligence cannot be contained: Lessons from computability theory. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12202 · DOI
  9. Allahbakhsh, M., Benatallah, B., Ignjatovic, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H. R., Bertino, E., & Dustdar, S. (2013). Quality control in crowdsourcing systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Internet Computing, 2, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2013.20 · DOI
  10. Amaral, G., Guizzardi, R., Guizzardi, G., & Mylopoulos, J. (2020). Ontology-based modeling and analysis of trustworthiness requirements: Preliminary results. In G. Dobbie, U. Frank, G. Kappel, S.W. Liddle, & H. C. Mayr (Eds.), Conceptual Modeling. ER 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 12400, pp. 342–352). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_25 · DOI
  11. Amaral, G., Sales, T. P., Guizzardi, G., & Porello, D. (2019). Towards a reference ontology of trust. In H. Panetto, C. Debruyne, M. Hepp, D. Lewis, C. Ardagna, & R. Meersman (Eds.), On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2019 Conferences. OTM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol .11877, pp. 3–21). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_1 · DOI
  12. Anati, I., Gueron, S., Johnson, S., & Scarlata, V. (2013). Innovative technology for CPU based attestation and sealing. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on hardware and architectural support for security and privacy (vol. 13, no. 7). ACM New York.
  13. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  14. Asan, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Choudhury, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare: Focus on clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e15154. https://doi.org/10.2196/15154 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bailey, J. E. (1991). Toward a science of metabolic engineering. Science, 252(5013), 1668–1675. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2047876 · DOI
  17. Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked: The new science of networks. Basic Books.
  18. Bedau, M. A. (1997). Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 375–399.
  19. Bedau, M. A., & Humphreys, P. E. (2008). Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.001.0001 · DOI
  20. Belchik, T. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence as a factor in labor productivity. In A. V. Bogoviz, A. E. Suglobov, A. N. Maloletko, & O. V. Kaurova (Eds.), Сooperation and sustainable development. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (vol. 245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_62 · DOI
  21. Benamati, J., Serva, M. A., & Fuller, M. A. (2006). Are trust and distrust distinct constructs? An empirical study of the effects of trust and distrust among online banking users. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 06, 121.2. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.63. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Benbasat, I., & Wang, W. (2005). Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00065 · DOI
  23. Bengio, Y. (2012). Deep learning of representations for unsupervised and transfer learning. Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning, 17–36.
  24. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press.
  25. Bickley, S. J., Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the field of economics. Scientometrics, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04294-w · DOI
  26. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., & Weber, R. (2001). Should optional properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.4.384.9702 · DOI
  27. Boero, R., Bravo, G., Castellani, M., & Squazzoni, F. (2009). Reputational cues in repeated trust games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 871–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.004 · DOI
  28. Bostrom, N. (1998). How long before superintelligence? International Journal of Futures Studies, 2(1), 1–9.
  29. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=7_H8AwAAQBAJ
  30. Brashear, T. G., Boles, J. S., Bellenger, D. N., & Brooks, C. M. (2003). An empirical test of trust-building processes and outcomes in sales manager-salesperson relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250902 · DOI
  31. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.
  32. Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  33. Bunge, M. A. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy: Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Reidel. · DOI
  34. Bunge, M. A. (1979). Treatise on basic philosophy: Ontology II: A world of systems. Reidel Publishing Company. · DOI
  35. Bunge, M. A. (1996). Finding philosophy in social science. Yale University Press.
  36. Bunge, M. A. (2003a). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. University of Toronto Press.
  37. Bunge, M. A. (2003b). Philosophical dictionary. Prometheus Books.
  38. Bunge, M. A. (2006). Chasing reality: Strife over realism. University of Toronto Press. · DOI
  39. Bunge, M. A. (2017). Philosophy of science: Volume 2, from explanation to justification. Routledge. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=NtwzDwAAQBAJ · DOI
  40. Bunge, M. A. (2018). Systems everywhere. In Cybernetics and applied systems (pp. 23–41). CRC Press. · DOI
  41. Castellanos, A., Tremblay, M., Lukyanenko, R., & Samuel, B. M. (2020). Basic classes in conceptual modeling: Theory and practical guidelines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(4), 1001–1044. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00627 · DOI
  42. Cerf, V. G. (2019). AI is not an excuse! Communications of the ACM, 62(10), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359332 · DOI
  43. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Polli, F., & Dattner, B. (2019). Building ethical AI for talent management. Harvard Business Review, 21.
  44. Chien, S.-Y., Sycara, K., Liu, J.-S., & Kumru, A. (2016). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits. 60(1), 841–845. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. · DOI
  45. Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. Basic Books.
  46. Davenport, T. H., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116. https://hbr.org/2018/01/artificial-intelligence-for-the-real-world
  48. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Gallo, S. (2006). How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58(3), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2005.07.007 · DOI
  49. Davis, E. (2015). Ethical guidelines for a superintelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 220, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.12.003 · DOI
  50. Davis, S. (2002). Brand asset management: How businesses can profit from the power of brand. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760210433654 · DOI
  51. Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 373–3A7. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721433 · DOI
  52. Dobing, B., & Parsons, J. (2006). How UML is used. Communications of the ACM, 49(5), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125944.1125949 · DOI
  53. Dokoohaki, N., & Matskin, M. (2008). Effective design of trust ontologies for improvement in the structure of socio-semantic trust networks. International Journal On Advances in Intelligent Systems, 1(1942–2679), 23–42.
  54. Domingos, P. (2012). A few useful things to know about machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 55(10), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Dosilović, F. K., Brčić, M., & Hlupić, N. (2018). Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. In International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 0210–0215). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400040 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. Free Press. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from http://books.google.ca/books?id=a0NqAAAAMAAJ
  57. Eisenstein, J. (2019). Introduction to Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=72yuDwAAQBAJ
  58. Ellul, J. (2022). Should we regulate artificial intelligence or some uses of software? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00021-9 · DOI
  59. Eriksson, O., Johannesson, P., & Bergholtz, M. (2019). The case for classes and instances-a response to representing instances: The case for reengineering conceptual modelling grammars. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(6), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2019.1673672 · DOI
  60. Faulkner, P., & Simpson, T. (2017). The philosophy of trust. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=YIgLDgAAQBAJ · DOI
  61. Ferrucci, D. (2010). Build watson: An overview of DeepQA for the Jeopardy! challenge. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilastion Techniques, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1854273.1854275 · DOI
  62. Fettke, P. (2009). How conceptual modeling is used. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02543 · DOI
  63. Fettke, P. (2020). Conceptual modelling and artificial intelligence: Overview and research challenges from the perspective of predictive business process management. In Joint Proceedings of Modellierung 2020 Short, Workshop and Tools & Demo Papers Workshop on Models in AI (pp. 157–164).
  64. Floridi, L. (2019). Should we be afraid of AI? Aeon Magazine.
  65. Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon and Schuster.
  66. Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. Wiley. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=KVd5AgAAQBAJ
  67. Garcia-Retamero, R., Müller, S. M., & Rousseau, D. L. (2012). The impact of value similarity and power on the perception of threat. Political Psychology, 33(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00869.x · DOI
  68. Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024833 · DOI
  69. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press USA.
  70. Golbeck, J., Parsia, B., & Hendler, J. (2003). Trust networks on the semantic web. In Cooperative information agents VII (Vol. 2782, pp. 238–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45217-1_18 · DOI
  71. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
  72. Goodman, N. (1972). Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman (Ed.), Problems and projects (pp. 437–447).
  73. Griffin, D. R., & Speck, G. B. (2004). New evidence of animal consciousness. Animal Cognition, 7(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0203-x · DOI
  74. Gulati, S., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2017). Modelling trust: An empirical assessment. In R. Bernhaupt, G. Dalvi, A. K. Joshi, D. Balkrishan, J. O’Neill, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017. INTERACT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol 10516). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_3 · DOI
  75. Gunning, D., & Aha, D. W. (2019). DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence program. AI Magazine, 40(2), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Haenlein, M., Huang, M.-H., & Kaplan, A. (2022). Guest editorial: Business ethics in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05060-x · DOI
  77. Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Random House.
  78. Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. Random House Digital, Inc.
  79. Heer, J. (2018). The partnership on AI. AI Matters, 4(3), 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284751.3284760 · DOI
  80. Holcomb, S. D., Porter, W. K., Ault, S. V., Mao, G., & Wang, J. (2018). Overview on deepmind and its alphago zero AI. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Big Data and Education (pp. 67–71). https://doi.org/10.1145/3206157.3206174 · DOI
  81. Holzinger, A. (2016). Interactive machine learning for health informatics: When do we need the human-in-the-loop? Brain Informatics, 3(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40708-016-0042-6 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Holzinger, A., Plass, M., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Holzinger, K., Crişan, G. C., Pintea, C.-M., & Palade, V. (2019). Interactive machine learning: Experimental evidence for the human in the algorithmic loop. Applied Intelligence, 49(7), 2401–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1361-5 · DOI
  83. Hsiao, R.-L. (2003). Technology fears: Distrust and cultural persistence in electronic marketplace adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(3), 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(03)00034-9 · DOI
  84. Huang, J., & Fox, M. S. (2006). An ontology of trust: Formal semantics and transitivity. In International Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 259–270). https://doi.org/10.1145/1151454.1151499 · DOI
  85. Hvalshagen, M., Lukyanenko, R., & Samuel, B. M. (2023). Empowering users with narratives: Examining the efficacy of narratives for understanding data-oriented conceptual models. Information Systems Research, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1141 · DOI
  86. Jacovi, A., Marasović, A., Miller, T., & Goldberg, Y. (2021). Formalizing trust in artificial intelligence: Prerequisites, causes and goals of human trust in AI. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 624–635). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445923 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Jermutus, E., Kneale, D., Thomas, J., & Michie, S. (2022). Influences on user trust in healthcare artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Wellcome Open Research, 7, 65. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17550.1 · DOI
  90. Jia, K., Kenney, M., Mattila, J., & Seppala, T. (2018). The application of artificial intelligence at Chinese digital platform giants: Baidu (p. 81). ETLA Reports.
  91. Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. Simon and Schuster.
  92. Keser, C. (2003). Experimental games for the design of reputation management systems. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0498 · DOI
  93. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., & Park, S.-J. (2006). Understanding conceptual schemas: Exploring the role of application and IS domain knowledge. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0081 · DOI
  94. Kirkpatrick, K. (2022). Still waiting for self-driving cars. Communications of the ACM, 65(4), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3516517 · DOI
  95. Kiron, D., & Schrage, M. (2019). Strategy for and with AI. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 30–35.
  96. Knight, W. (2017). DARPA is funding projects that will try to open up AI’s black boxes. MIT Technology Review.
  97. Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2008). A two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(12), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00180 · DOI
  98. Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., & Simmons, B. (2016). Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436 · DOI
  99. Kożuch, B., & Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2022). Building collaborative trust in public safety networks. Safety Science, 152, 105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105785 · DOI
  100. Kroeger, F. (2019). Unlocking the treasure trove: How can Luhmann’s theory of trust enrich trust research? Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1552592 · DOI
  101. Kubiszewski, I., Noordewier, T., & Costanza, R. (2011). Perceived credibility of internet encyclopedias. Computers & Education, 56(3), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.008 · DOI
  102. Kuipers, B. (2018). How can we trust a robot? Communications of the ACM, 61(3), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173087 · DOI · Paper page
  103. Langlotz, C. P. (2019). Will artificial intelligence replace radiologists? Radiology. Artificial Intelligence, 1(3), e190058. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2019190058 · DOI
  104. Larsen, K. R., Lukyanenko, R., Muller, R., Storey, V. C., Vander Meer, D., Parsons, J., & Hovorka, D. S. (2020). Validity in design science research. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (pp. 1–15). Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. · DOI
  105. Lazer, D., Pentland, A. S., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5915), 721. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742 · DOI · Paper page
  106. Lee, D., & Yoon, S. N. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010271 · DOI · Paper page
  107. Lee, J. D., & Kolodge, K. (2020). Exploring trust in self-driving vehicles through text analysis. Human Factors, 62(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819872672 · DOI
  108. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Leidner, D. E., & Tona, O. (2021). The CARE theory of dignity amid personal data digitalization. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15941 · DOI
  110. Li, J., Zhou, Y., Yao, J., & Liu, X. (2021). An empirical investigation of trust in AI in a Chinese petrochemical enterprise based on institutional theory. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92904-7 · DOI
  111. Li, K., & Wieringa, P. A. (2000). Understanding perceived complexity in human supervisory control. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110050029 · DOI
  112. Lötsch, J., Kringel, D., & Ultsch, A. (2021). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in biomedicine: Making AI decisions trustworthy for physicians and patients. BioMedInformatics, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics2010001 · DOI
  113. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=zVZQW4gxXk4C
  114. Luhmann, N. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 6(1), 94–107.
  115. Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons.
  116. Luhmann, N., & Gilgen, P. (2012). Introduction to systems theory. Wiley. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://books.google.ca/books?id=3mnUSAAACAAJ
  117. Lukyanenko, R., Castellanos, A., Parsons, J., Chiarini Tremblay, M., & Storey, V. C. (2019a). Using conceptual modeling to support machine learning. In C. Cappiello & M. Ruiz (Eds.), Information systems engineering in responsible information systems (pp. 170–181). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21297-1_15 · DOI
  118. Lukyanenko, R., Castellanos, A., Samuel, B. M., Tremblay, M., & Maass, W. (2021a). Research agenda for basic explainable AI. Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–8).
  119. Lukyanenko, R., Castellanos, A., Storey, V. C., Castillo, A., Tremblay, M. C., & Parsons, J. (2020). Superimposition: Augmenting machine learning outputs with conceptual models for explainable AI. In 1st international workshop on conceptual modeling meets artificial intelligence and data-driven decision making (pp. 1–12). Springer.
  120. Lukyanenko, R., & Parsons, J. (2018). Beyond Micro-tasks: Research opportunities in observational crowdsourcing. Journal of Database Management (JDM), 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2018010101 · DOI
  121. Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., & Samuel, B. M. (2019b). Representing instances: The case for reengineering conceptual modeling grammars. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1488567 · DOI
  122. Lukyanenko, R., Storey, V. C., & Pastor, O. (2021b). Foundations of information technology based on Bunge’s systemist philosophy of reality. Software and Systems Modeling, 20(1), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00862-5 · DOI
  123. Lukyanenko, R., Storey, V. C., & Pastor, O. (2022). System: A Core conceptual modeling construct for capturing complexity. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 141, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102062 · DOI
  124. Lukyanenko, R., & Weber, R. (2022). A realist ontology of digital objects and digitalized systems. In “Digital first” era — A joint AIS SIGSAND/SIGPrag workshop (pp. 1–5). Virtual Workshop.
  125. Lumineau, F., & Schilke, O. (2018). Trust development across levels of analysis: An embedded-agency perspective. Journal of Trust Research, 8(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1531766 · DOI
  126. Maass, W., Castellanos, A., Tremblay, M. C., Lukyanenko, R., & Storey, V. C. (2022a). Concept Superimposition: Using conceptual modeling method for explainable AI. In AAAI Spring Symposium: MAKE 2022 (pp. 1–6). Palm Springs.
  127. Maass, W., Castellanos, A., Tremblay, M., & Lukyanenko, R. (2022b). AI Explainability: A conceptual model embedding. In International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–8).
  128. Maass, W., & Storey, V. C. (2021). Pairing conceptual modeling with machine learning. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101909 · DOI
  129. Maass, W., Storey, V. C., & Lukyanenko, R. (2021). From mental models to machine learning models via conceptual models. In Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Development (EMMSAD 2021) (pp. 1–8). Melbourne, Australia. · DOI
  130. Marcus, G., & Davis, E. (2019). Rebooting AI: Building artificial intelligence we can trust. Pantheon Books.
  131. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. WW Norton & Company.
  132. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
  133. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
  134. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Miller, T., Howe, P., & Sonenberg, L. (2017). Explainable AI: Beware of inmates running the asylum or: How I learnt to stop worrying and love the social and behavioural sciences. ArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.00547 · DOI · Paper page
  136. Moody, D. L. (2009). The “physics” of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions On, 35(6), 756–779. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2009.67 · DOI
  137. Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606073424 · DOI
  138. Morgner, C. (2018). Trust and society: Suggestions for further development of Niklas Luhmann’s theory of trust. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 55(2), 232–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12191 · DOI
  139. Murphy, G. (2004). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.
  140. Mylopoulos, J. (1998). Information modeling in the time of the revolution. Information Systems, 23(3–4), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4379(98)00005-2 · DOI
  141. Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Sage. · DOI · Paper page
  142. Oksanen, A., Savela, N., Latikka, R., & Koivula, A. (2020). Trust toward robots and artificial intelligence: An experimental approach to human–technology interactions online. Frontiers in Psychology, 3336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568256 · DOI
  143. Paré, G., Marsan, J., Jaana, M., Tamim, H., & Lukyanenko, R. (2020). IT vendors’ legitimation strategies and market share: The case of EMR systems. Information & Management, 57(5), 103291.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103291 · DOI
  144. Park, J., & Kim, J. (2022). A data-driven exploration of the race between human labor and machines in the 21st century. Communications of the ACM, 65(5), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488376 · DOI
  145. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2008a). A question of class. Nature, 455(7216), 1040–1041. https://doi.org/10.1038/4551040a · DOI
  146. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2008b). Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 839–868. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148874 · DOI
  147. Petersen, B. K., Chowhan, J., Cooke, G. B., Gosine, R., & Warrian, P. J. (2022). Automation and the future of work: An intersectional study of the role of human capital, income, gender and visible minority status. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 0143831X221088301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X221088301 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
  149. Pratt, L. Y. (1992). Discriminability-based transfer between neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 5.
  150. Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5 · DOI · Paper page
  151. Ramge, T. (2019). Who’s afraid of AI?: Fear and promise in the age of thinking machines. The Experiment.
  152. Rao, A. S., & Verweij, G. (2017). Sizing the prize: What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalise (pp. 1–30). PwC Publication.
  153. Recker, J., Lukyanenko, R., Sabegh, M. A., Samuel, B. M., & Castellanos, A. (2021). From representation to mediation: A new agenda for conceptual modeling research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 269–300. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16027 · DOI
  154. Riedl, R. (2022) Is trust in artificial intelligence systems related to user personality? Review of empirical evidence and future research directions. Electronic Markets, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00594-4 · DOI
  155. Reimer, U., Bork, D., Fettke, P., & Tropmann-Frick, M. (2020). Preface of the first Workshop "Models in AI" (pp. 128–129). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2542/MOD-KI-preface.pdf
  156. Renner, M., Lins, S., Söllner, M., Thiebes, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2022). Understanding the necessary conditions of multi-source trust transfer in artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS2022) (pp. 1–10). http://hdl.handle.net/10125/80057
  157. Rescher, N. (2013). Value matters: Studies in axiology (Vol. 8). Walter de Gruyter.
  158. Robert Jr., L. P., Bansal, G., Melville, N., & Stafford, T. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on AI fairness, trust, and ethics. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00134 · DOI
  159. Rosch, E. (1977). Classification of real-world objects: Origins and representations in cognition (pp. 212–222). In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason, (Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
  160. Rosemann, M., & Green, P. (2002). Developing a meta model for the Bunge–Wand–Weber ontological constructs. Information Systems, 27(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4379(01)00048-5 · DOI
  161. Rossi, F. (2018). Building trust in artificial intelligence. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 127–134. https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/building-trust-artificial-intelligence
  162. Rotenberg, K. J. (2019). The psychology of interpersonal trust: Theory and research. Routledge. · DOI
  163. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · DOI · Paper page
  164. Sabel, C. F. (1993). Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9), 1133–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600907 · DOI
  165. Sadiku, M. N., Fagbohungbe, O. I., & Musa, S. M. (2020). Artificial intelligence in cyber security. International Journal of Engineering Research and Advanced Technology, 6(05), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJERAT.2020.3670 · DOI
  166. Salk, C. F., Sturn, T., See, L., Fritz, S., & Perger, C. (2015). Assessing quality of volunteer crowdsourcing contributions: Lessons from the cropland capture game. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2015.1039609 · DOI
  167. Samuel, A. L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.116.0601 · DOI · Paper page
  168. Samuel, B. M., Khatri, V., & Ramesh, V. (2018). Exploring the effects of extensional versus intentional representations on domain understanding. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1187–1209. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13255 · DOI
  169. Sanders, T., Oleson, K. E., Billings, D. R., Chen, J. Y., & Hancock, P. A. (2011). A model of human-robot trust: Theoretical model development. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1432–1436). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551298 · DOI
  170. Scanlon, J. M., Kusano, K. D., Daniel, T., Alderson, C., Ogle, A., & Victor, T. (2021). Waymo simulated driving behavior in reconstructed fatal crashes within an autonomous vehicle operating domain. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 163(1), 106–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106454 · DOI
  171. Scheman, N. (2015). Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity as trustworthiness. In Shifting Ground: Knowledge and Reality, Transgression and Trustworthiness. Oxford University Press.
  172. Schlindwein, S. L., & Ison, R. (2004). Human knowing and perceived complexity: Implications for systems practice. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 6(3), 27–32.
  173. Schniter, E., Shields, T. W., & Sznycer, D. (2020). Trust in humans and robots: Economically similar but emotionally different. Journal of Economic Psychology, 78, 102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102253 · DOI
  174. Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2008). The value of distrust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.003 · DOI
  175. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Simon and Schuster.
  176. Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press. · DOI
  177. Selbst, A., & Powles, J. (2018). “Meaningful information” and the right to explanation (pp. 48–48). PMLR.
  178. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Nuredini, J., Tobin, D., & Weber, R. (2008). Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148856 · DOI
  179. Shaturaev, J. (2022). Economies and management as a result of the fourth industrial revolution: An education perspective. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(1), 51–58. · DOI
  180. Siau, K., & Wang, W. (2018). Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Cutter Business Technology Journal, 31(2), 47–53.
  181. Siegrist, M., & Zingg, A. (2014). The role of public trust during pandemics. European Psychologist, 19(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000169 · DOI · Paper page
  182. Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00517.x · DOI
  183. Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). How to use behavioral research insights on trust for HCI system design. In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1703–1708). https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223696 · DOI
  184. Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2013). What we really know about antecedents of trust: A critical review of the empirical information systems literature on trust. In Psychology of Trust: New Research, D. Gefen. Verlag/Publisher: Nova Science Publishers. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/absract=2475385
  185. Starke, G., van den Brule, R., Elger, B. S., & Haselager, P. (2022). Intentional machines: A defence of trust in medical artificial intelligence. Bioethics, 36(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12891 · DOI
  186. Steinke, F., Fritsch, T., & Silbermann, L. (2012). Trust in ambient assisted living (AAL)-a systematic review of trust in automation and assistance systems. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 4(3–4).
  187. Storey, V. C., & Goldstein, R. C. (1993). Knowledge-based approaches to database design. MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/249508 · DOI
  188. Storey, V. C., Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., & Maass, W. (2022). Explainable AI: Opening the black box or Pandora’s box? Communications of the ACM, 65(4), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490699 · DOI
  189. Sturt, H. (1903). Happiness. The international. The Journal of Ethics, 13(2), 207–221. · DOI
  190. Taddeo, M. (2021). On the risks of trusting artificial intelligence: The case of cybersecurity. In: J. Cowls, & J. Morley (Eds.), The 2020 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab. Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook (pp. 97–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80083-3_10 · DOI
  191. Taddeo, M., McCutcheon, T., & Floridi, L. (2019). Trusting artificial intelligence in cybersecurity is a double-edged sword. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(12), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0109-1 · DOI
  192. Teorey, T. J., Yang, D., & Fry, J. P. (1986). A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1145/7474.7475 · DOI
  193. Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021). Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4 · DOI · Paper page
  194. Vardi, M. Y. (2022). ACM, ethics, and corporate behavior. Communications of the ACM, 65(3), 5–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3516423 · DOI
  195. Verissimo, P., Correia, M., Neves, N. F., & Sousa, P. (2009). Intrusion-resilient middleware design and validation. In Information Assurance, Security and Privacy Services (Vol. 4, pp. 615–678).
  196. von Neumann, J. (1958). The computer and the brain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  197. Waldrop, M. M. (2015). No drivers required. Nature, 518(7537), 20. https://doi.org/10.1038/518020a · DOI
  198. Wan, Y., Gao, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). Blockchain application and collaborative innovation in the manufacturing industry: Based on the perspective of social trust. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121540 · DOI
  199. Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (2002). Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling—A research agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.4.363.69 · DOI
  200. Wang, W., & Siau, K. (2018). Trusting artificial intelligence in healthcare. Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–1).

200 of 209 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lukyanenko, R., Maass, W., & Storey, V. C.
Venue
Electronic Markets
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-11-28
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
1993-2020
ISSN
  • 1019-6781
  • 1422-8890
DOI
10.1007/s12525-022-00605-4
Cited by
171
References
28
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review