Cited by 10Speech and dialogue systemsNatural Language Processing TechniquesTopic Modeling

Towards User-Centric Text-to-Text Generation: A Survey

Yang, Diyi, Flek, Lucie·2021·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-83527-9_1

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalized AI applications, including personalized AI writing assistance, are becoming more common and readily accessible.

    “Meanwhile, personalized AI applications-including personalized AI writing assistance-are becoming more common and readily accessible [9,14,27,65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, D., & Flek, L.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Flek, Lucie
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2021
Pages
3-22
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3196937884
Cited by
10
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
text-to-text generation, personalization, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review