Cited by 56AI in cancer detectionDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningCell Image Analysis Techniques

Self-supervised Visual Representation Learning for Histopathological Images

Yang, Pengshuai, Hong, Zhiwei, Yin, Xiaoxu, Zhu, Chengzhan, Jiang, Rui·2021·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, P., Hong, Z., Yin, X., Zhu, C., & Jiang, R.
Affiliations
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Rui
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2021
Pages
47-57
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3204014573
Cited by
56
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
self-supervised learning, histopathological images, visual representation learning, contrastive learning, data augmentation, domain knowledge, colorectal cancer, histopathological image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review