Cited by 5,336Face and Expression RecognitionNeural Networks and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Algorithms

Dimensionality Reduction by Learning an Invariant Mapping

Open access
Hadsell, R., Chopra, S., LeCun, Y.·2006·2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06)

Abstract

Dimensionality reduction involves mapping a set of high dimensional input points onto a low dimensional manifold so that 'similar" points in input space are mapped to nearby points on the manifold. We present a method - called Dimensionality Reduction by Learning an Invariant Mapping (DrLIM) - for learning a globally coherent nonlinear function that maps the data evenly to the output manifold. The learning relies solely on neighborhood relationships and does not require any distancemeasure in the input space. The method can learn mappings that are invariant to certain transformations of the inputs, as is demonstrated with a number of experiments. Comparisons are made to other techniques, in particular LLE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2006.100

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 1D CNN can be applied to signal identification such as ECG signal identification, structural damage identification, and system fault identification.

    “It can be applied to ECG signal identification, structural damage identification, and system fault identification.”
  • In NLP, contrastive learning can be done by putting semantically close neighbors together and pushing apart non-neighbors.

    “In the case of NLP, it can be done by putting semantically close neighbors together and pushing apart non-neighbors [28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadsell, R., Chopra, S., & LeCun, Y.
Affiliations
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
Venue
2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-07-10
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
1735-1742
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138621090
Cited by
5,336
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 217 · 2025: 475 · 2024: 622 · 2023: 779 · 2022: 740 · 2021: 867 · 2020: 589 · 2019: 384 · 2018: 222 · 2017: 153 · 2016: 102 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
7.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
dimensionality reduction, manifold learning, nonlinear mapping, neighborhood relationships, transformation invariance, locally linear embedding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review