Cited by 14Technology Use by Older AdultsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Expert Insights for Designing Conversational User Interfaces as Virtual Assistants and Companions for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairments

Koebel, Kathrin, Lacayo, Martin, Murali, Madhumitha, Tarnanas, Ioannis, Çöltekin, Arzu·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-94890-0_2

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koebel, K., Lacayo, M., Murali, M., Tarnanas, I., & Çöltekin, A.
Affiliations
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
Corresponding author
Çöltekin, Arzu
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
23-38
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4210758232
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
conversational interfaces, virtual assistants, virtual companions, older adults, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, design guidelines, expert interviews

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review