Cited by 219Social Robot Interaction and HRIDigital Mental Health InterventionsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Response to a relational agent by hospital patients with depressive symptoms

Open access
Bickmore, Timothy W., Mitchell, Suzanne E., Jack, Brian W., Paasche-Orlow, Michael K., Pfeifer, Laura M., O’Donnell, Julie·2010·Interacting with Computers

Abstract

Depression affects approximately 15% of the US population, and is recognized as an important risk factor for poor outcomes among patients with various illnesses. Automated health education and behavior change programs have the potential to help address many of the shortcomings in health care. However, the role of these systems in the care of patients with depression has been insufficiently examined. In the current study, we sought to evaluate how hospitalized medical patients would respond to a computer animated conversational agent that has been developed to provide information in an empathic fashion about a patient's hospital discharge plan. In particular, we sought to examine how patients who have a high level of depressive symptoms respond to this system. Therapeutic alliance-the trust and belief that a patient and provider have in working together to achieve a desired therapeutic outcome- was used as the primary outcome measure, since it has been shown to be important in predicting outcomes across a wide range of health problems, including depression. In an evaluation of 139 hospital patients who interacted with the agent at the time of discharge, all patients, regardless of depressive symptoms, rated the agent very high on measures of satisfaction and ease of use, and most preferred receiving their discharge information from the agent compared to their doctors or nurses in the hospital. In addition, we found that patients with symptoms indicative of major depression rated the agent significantly higher on therapeutic alliance compared to patients who did not have major depressive symptoms. We conclude that empathic agents represent a promising technology for patient assessment, education and counseling for those most in need of comfort and caring in the inpatient setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intcom.2009.12.001

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have demonstrated that chatbot interventions improve psychological difficulties including major depressive disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, antipsychotic medication adherence, and perceived stress.

    “Previous studies have demonstrated that chatbot interventions improve psychological difficulties including major depressive disorder [15], panic disorder [16], posttraumatic stress disorder [17], antipsychotic medication adherence [18], and perceived stress [19].”

    From A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Chatbot (Otis) for Health Anxiety Management: Mixed Methods Pilot Study (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    Citation [15] is attached to major depressive disorder, not the other conditions in the sentence. The Related Work section says internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy can relieve depressive symptoms, but does not identify those interventions as chatbots. This paper’s Discussion reports that patients with major depressive symptoms accepted and formed a stronger alliance with the relational agent; it does not report that the agent improved their depression. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Designing for certain character traits, such as empathy, in a chatbot can increase the likelihood of users establishing relationships with it.

    “Designing for certain character traits, such as empathy, in a chatbot can increase the likelihood of users establishing relationships with it (Bickmore et al., 2010).”

    From My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships (2021) · cites this paper as Bickmore et al., 2010

  • Patients with depression and/or low health literacy reported stronger therapeutic alliance with the conversational agent.

    “In one example, patients reported high satisfaction with a conversational agent that delivered hospital discharge instructions, and patients with depression and/or low health literacy reported stronger therapeutic alliance with the agent.”
  • The conversational agent elicited more questions from those with lower health literacy.

    “The agent also elicited more questions from those with lower health literacy, suggesting such agents may have the potential to provide health information in a supportive, non-threatening manner (57).”
  • Conversational agents may have the potential to provide health information in a supportive, non-threatening manner.

    “The agent also elicited more questions from those with lower health literacy, suggesting such agents may have the potential to provide health information in a supportive, non-threatening manner (57).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bickmore T Pfeifer L Relational Agents for Antipsychotic Medication Adherence Proceedings of the CHI'08 Workshop on Technology in Mental Health 2008 Florence, Italy
  2. Lisetti C Embodied Computer Agents for psychotherapy 2008 Paper presented at the CHI 2008 Workshop on Technology in Mental Health
  3. Wright J Wright J Computer-Assisted Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Review of Psychiatry: Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 2004 Vol. 23 Washington, DC American Psychiatric Publishing 55 82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickmore, T. W., Mitchell, S. E., Jack, B. W., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Pfeifer, L. M., & O’Donnell, J.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Bickmore, Timothy W.
Venue
Interacting with Computers
Published
2010-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
289-298
ISSN
0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989452694
Cited by
218
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interacting with Computers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL081307)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
chatbots, depression, depressive symptoms, therapeutic relationship, discharge planning, patient satisfaction, ease of use, health education, inpatient care, patient-provider relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review