CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Workplace Health and Well-beingDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Workplace Health Promotion: mHealth as a Preventive Mediator Between Psychosocial Workplace Characteristics and Well-Being at Work

Open access
Rick, Vera Barbara, Rasche, Peter, Mertens, Alexander, Nitsch, Verena·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-06018-2_18
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-06018-2_18

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Independence of time and place for use, accessibility and embedding into daily routines were mentioned as advantages most often.

    “particularly the independence of time and place for use, accessibility and embedding into daily routines were mentioned as advantages most often [17, 31, 39, 46, 51].”

    From Advantages and disadvantages of mobile applications for workplace health promotion: A scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [51]

    Section 1.2 describes accessibility as a benefit of mHealth, and the Discussion says employees can access apps anytime and anywhere. The paper does not say that embedding apps into daily routines was an advantage, or that these advantages were mentioned most often; its app-use measure came from log files, not reports of perceived advantages. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Junghanns, G., Morschhäuser, M.: Psychische Belastung bei Wissens- und Dienstleistungsarbeit – eine Einführung. In: für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, B., Junghanns, G., Morschhäuser, M. (eds.) Immer schneller, immer mehr. psychische Belastung bei Wissens-und Dienstleistungsarbeit (2013). Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01445-2_1 · DOI
  2. Müller-Thur, K., Angerer, P., Körner, U., Dragano, N.: Arbeit mit digitalen technologien, psychosoziale belastungen und potenzielle gesundheitliche konsequenzen. Zeitschrift für medizinische Prävention 53, 388–391 (2018)
  3. Treier, M.: Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastungen: Begründung, Instrumente, Umsetzung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23293-1 · DOI
  4. Johns, G.: Absenteeism and presenteeism: not at work or not working well. In: The SAGE Handbook of Organizational, vol. 1, pp. 160–177 (2008) · DOI
  5. Personage, M., Saini, G.: Mental Health at Work. The business costs ten years on, London (2007)
  6. Ganster, D.C., Rosen, C.C.: Work stress and employee health: a multidisciplinary review. J. Manag. 39(5), 1085–1122 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313475815 · DOI
  7. Kivimäki, M., et al.: Psychosocial work environment as a risk factor for absence with a psychiatric diagnosis: an instrumental-variables analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 172(2), 167–172 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq094 · DOI
  8. Samuelsson, Å., Ropponen, A., Alexanderson, K., Svedberg, P.: Psychosocial working conditions, occupational groups, and risk of disability pension due to mental diagnoses: a cohort study of 43,000 Swedish twins. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 351-360 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3338 · DOI
  9. Virtanen, M., Vahtera, J., Pentti, J., Honkonen, T., Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M.: Job strain and psychologic distress influence on sickness absence among Finnish employees. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33(3), 182–187 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.003 · DOI
  10. Johnson, J.V., Hall, E.M.: Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am. J. Public Health 78, 1336–1342 (1988) · DOI
  11. Johnson, J.V., Hall, E.M., Theorell, T.: Combined effects of job strain and social isolation on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in a random sample of the Swedish male working population. Scand J Work Environ Health, 271-279 (1989). https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1852 · DOI
  12. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W.B.: The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(3), 499 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E.: The job demands‐resources model: state of the art. J. Manag. Psych. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bakker, A.B., Hakanen, J.J., Demerouti, E., Xanthopoulou, D.: Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. J. Educ. Psychol. 99, 274 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Halbesleben, J.R.B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., Westman, M.: Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J. Manag. 40, 1334–1364 (2014)
  16. Han, M., Lee, E.: Effectiveness of mobile health application use to improve health behavior changes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Healthc. Inf. Res. 24, 207–226 (2018) · DOI
  17. Rasche, P., et al.: others: The aachen falls prevention scale: multi-study evaluation and comparison. JMIR Aging 2, e12114 (2019) · DOI
  18. DiFilippo, K.N., Huang, W.-H., Andrade, J.E., Chapman-Novakofski, K.M.: The use of mobile apps to improve nutrition outcomes: a systematic literature review. J. Telemed. Telecare 21(5), 243–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15572203 · DOI
  19. European commission: communication from the commission to the parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, health action plan 2012–2020 – innovative healthcare for the 21st century. European Union, Brussels (2012). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01972243.2018.1438550. Accessed 16 Nov 2021 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Punnett, L., Cherniack, M., Henning, R., Morse, T., Faghri, P.: CPH-new research team: a conceptual framework for integrating workplace health promotion and occupational ergonomics programs. Public Health Rep. 124, 16–25 (2009) · DOI
  21. Goetzel, R.Z., Shechter, D., Ozminkowski, R.J., Marmet, P.F., Tabrizi, M.J., Roemer, E.C.: Promising practices in employer health and productivity management efforts: findings from a benchmarking study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 49, 111–130 (2007) · DOI
  22. Stratton, E., Lampit, A., Choi, I., Calvo, R.A., Harvey, S.B., Glozier, N.: Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for reducing mental health conditions in employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12, e0189904 (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  23. Carolan, S., Harris, P.R., Cavanagh, K.: Improving employee well-being and effectiveness: systematic review and meta-analysis of web-based psychological interventions delivered in the workplace. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e271 (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Stratton, E., Jones, N., Peters, S.E., Torous, J., Glozier, N.: Digital mHealth interventions for employees: systematic review and meta-analysis of their effects on workplace outcomes. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 63, e512–e525 (2021) · DOI
  25. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Gensler, S., Weiber, R., Weiber, T.: Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32425-4 · DOI
  26. Bortz, J., Schuster, C.: Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010) · DOI
  27. Bech, P., Gudex, C., Johansen, K.S.: The WHO (Ten) well-being index: validation in diabetes. PPS 65(4), 183–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1159/000289073 · DOI
  28. Staehr, J.K.: Multicentre Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Pump Feasibility and Acceptability Study Experience. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Copenhagen (1989)
  29. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences. Guilford Press, New York (2016)
  30. Bühner, M.: Einführung in die Test - und Fragebogenkonstruktion, 2nd edn. Pearson Deutschland GmbH. (2011)
  31. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic press, Cambridge (1988)
  32. Guttman, L.: Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 19, 149–161 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289162 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kaiser, H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 20, 141–151 (1960) · DOI · Paper page
  34. Schmitt, N.: Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol. Assess. 8(4), 350 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Satorra, A., Bentler, P.M.: Corrections to Test Statistics and Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Analysis. Sage Publications, California (1994)
  36. Cohen, J.: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1), 155 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Blanca Mena, M.J., Alarcón Postigo, R., Arnau Gras, J., Bono Cabré, R., Bendayan, R.: Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema 29(4), 552–557 (2017)
  38. Glass, G.V., Peckham, P.D., Sanders, J.R.: Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Rev. Educ. Res. 42, 237–288 (1972) · DOI · Paper page
  39. Wilcox, R.R.: Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Academic press, Cambridge (2011)
  40. Rasch, D., Guiard, V.: The robustness of parametric statistical methods. Psychol. Sci. 46, 175–208 (2004)
  41. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173 (1986) · DOI · Paper page
  42. Zhao, X., Lynch, J., Chen, Q.: Reconsidering baron and kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37(2), 197–206 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  43. Klenk, S., Reifegerste, D., Renatus, R.: Gender differences in gratifications from fitness app use and implications for health interventions. Mobile Media Commun. 5, 178–193 (2017) · DOI
  44. Mamolo, M., Scherbov, S.: Population Projections for Forty-Four European Countries: The Ongoing Population Ageing. Princeton, Citeseer (2009)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rick, V. B., Rasche, P., Mertens, A., & Nitsch, V.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics (DE)
Corresponding author
Rick, Vera Barbara
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2022
Pages
249-265
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-06018-2_18
OpenAlex
W4283807103
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (HORIZON2020, 826232)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
workplace health promotion, mobile health, mobile health apps, employee well-being, occupational stress, mental health, mediation, gender differences, age differences, stress coping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review