Cited by 8Tactile and Sensory InteractionsSpatial Cognition and NavigationDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Non-visual access to an interactive 3d map.

Open access
Coughlan, James M., Biggs, Brandon, Shen, Huiying·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Maps are indispensable for helping people learn about unfamiliar environments and plan trips. While tactile (2D) and 3D maps offer non-visual map access to people who are blind or visually impaired (BVI), this access is greatly enhanced by adding interactivity to the maps: when the user points at a feature of interest on the map, the name and other information about the feature is read aloud in audio. We explore how the use of an interactive 3D map of a playground, containing over seventy play structures and other features, affects spatial learning and cognition. Specifically, we perform experiments in which four blind participants answer questions about the map to evaluate their grasp of three types of spatial knowledge: landmark, route and survey. The results of these experiments demonstrate that participants are able to acquire this knowledge, most of which would be inaccessible without the interactivity of the map.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-08648-9_29

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Shi L, McLachlan R, Zhao Y, Azenkot S (2016, October). “ Magic touch: interacting with 3D printed graphics.” In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 329– 330).
  2. [12]Brooke J (2013). “ SUS: a retrospective.” Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29– 40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coughlan, J. M., Biggs, B., & Shen, H.
Affiliations
  • Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Coughlan, James M.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Volume
13341
Pages
253-260
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4285219906
Cited by
8
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY025332)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
blind and visually impaired users, spatial learning, spatial cognition, landmark knowledge, route knowledge, survey knowledge, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review