Cited by 14Tactile and Sensory InteractionsAugmented Reality ApplicationsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

An audio-based 3d spatial guidance ar system for blind users.

Open access
Coughlan, James M., Biggs, Brandon, Rivière, Marc-Aurèle, Shen, Huiying·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has great potential for blind users because it enables a range of applications that provide audio information about specific locations or directions in the user’s environment. For instance, the CamIO (“Camera Input-Output”) AR app makes physical objects (such as documents, maps, devices and 3D models) accessible to blind and visually impaired persons by providing real-time audio feedback in response to the location on an object that the user is touching (using an inexpensive stylus). An important feature needed by blind users of AR apps such as CamIO is a 3D spatial guidance feature that provides real-time audio feedback to help the user find a desired location on an object. We have devised a simple audio interface to provide verbal guidance towards a target of interest in 3D. The experiment we report with blind participants using this guidance interface demonstrates the feasibility of the approach and its benefit for helping users find locations of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_55

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Miele J: Talking Tactile Apps for the Pulse Pen: STEM Binder. In: 25th Annual Int’l Technology & Persons with Disabilities Conference (CSUN) (2010)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coughlan, J. M., Biggs, B., Rivière, M.-A., & Shen, H.
Affiliations
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Coughlan, James M.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Volume
12376
Pages
475-484
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3084702265
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY025332)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
augmented reality, blind users, visually impaired users, audio feedback, verbal guidance, audio interface, location finding, touch interaction, accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review