Cited by 17Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

The Epidemiology of Diabetic Neuropathy

Open access
Hansen, Christian Stevns, Määttä, Laura L., Andersen, Signe Toft, Charles, Morten H.·2023·Contemporary Diabetes

Abstract

Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications to diabetes that is associated with substantial negative individual and socioeconomic consequences. Diabetic neuropathy encompasses a heterogeneous group of neuropathic syndromes with varying clinical manifestations. The most common forms of diabetic neuropathy are: distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN). Estimating prevalence and incidence rate is challenging as diagnostic criteria for the complications vary between studies and depending on the geographical origin of studies. In addition, scares data is available from longitudinal studies, which restricts the ability to present substantial data on incidence rates and disease progression. Based on reviews of major studies of diabetic neuropathy from the last four decades, we present data on the global prevalence and incidence of DSPN and CAN. In summary, the prevalence of clinical DSPN varies between 20% and 30% for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with significant variability between studies and geographical regions. Approximately, 15% of people with diabetes suffer from painful DSPN. A common risk maker for DSPN and painful DSPN is diabetes duration. The incidence of DSPN is generally higher in type 2 diabetes than in type 1 diabetes. CAN prevalence in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes also varies by geographical region. Estimates vary between 10 and 30% with a tendency to higher prevalence in non-Western regions. CAN…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-15613-7_2

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, C. S., Määttä, L. L., Andersen, S. T., & Charles, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus (DK)
Corresponding author
Charles, Morten H.
Venue
Contemporary Diabetes
Published
2023
Pages
5-36
ISSN
  • 2197-7836 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-7844
OpenAlex
W4328022460
Cited by
17
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
20.13
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • Springer eBooks (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
diabetic neuropathy, distal symmetric polyneuropathy, cardiac autonomic neuropathy, prevalence, incidence, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, diabetic neuropathic pain, diabetes duration, regional variation, diagnostic criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review