Cited by 147Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Latency-Aware Collaborative Perception

Open access
Lei, Zixing, Ren, Shunli, Hu, Yue, Zhang, Wenjun, Chen, Siheng·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-19824-3_19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The available bandwidth for communication between vehicles and infrastructure is often limited, and sharing this limited resource among numerous vehicles can lead to reduced data transfer rates and slower communication.

    “Moreover, the available bandwidth for communication between vehicles and infrastructure is often limited.Sharing this limited resource among numerous vehicles can lead to reduced data transfer rates and slower communication.”
  • In collaborative perception, latency issues can be caused by communication delay between multiple agents, and this delay can cause potential performance degradation and high risks in safety-critical applications.

    “In the context of collaborative perception, latency issues can be caused by the communication delay between multiple agents.This delay can cause potential performance degradation and high risks in safety-critical applications [34].”
  • Network congestion and limited bandwidth can cause latency in transmitting data, impacting the real-time nature of ICV communication.

    “Furthermore, network congestion and limited bandwidth can cause latency in transmitting data, impacting the real-time nature of ICV communication.”
  • A latency-aware collaborative perception system leverages feature-attention symbiotic estimation and time modulation techniques to achieve feature-level synchronization.

    “To further improve the generalization ability in real-world scenarios, a latency-aware collaborative perception system is proposed [34], which leverages feature-attention symbiotic estimation and time modulation techniques to achieve feature-level synchronization.”
  • A curriculum learning technology is used to gradually increase the latency time by randomly sampling the latency time with an exponential distribution to accommodate the flexible communication latency.

    “Furthermore, a curriculum learning technology is used to gradually increase the latency time by randomly sampling the latency time with an exponential distribution to accommodate the flexible communication latency.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 147

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Araniti, G., Campolo, C., Condoluci, M., Iera, A., Molinaro, A.: LTE for vehicular networking: a survey. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51, 148–157 (2013) · DOI
  2. Chen, S., Liu, B., Feng, C., Vallespi-Gonzalez, C., Wellington, C.: 3D point cloud processing and learning for autonomous driving: impacting map creation, localization, and perception. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 38(1), 68–86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2020.2984780 · DOI
  3. Chen, W., Xu, R., Xiang, H., Liu, L., Ma, J.: Model-agnostic multi-agent perception framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13168 (2022) · arXiv
  4. Choy, C., Gwak, J., Savarese, S.: 4D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3075–3084 (2019) · DOI
  5. Cui, J., Qiu, H., Chen, D., Stone, P., Zhu, Y.: Coopernaut: end-to-end driving with cooperative perception for networked vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 17252–17262 (2022) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., Koltun, V.: CARLA: an open urban driving simulator. In: Conference on robot learning, pp. 1–16. PMLR (2017)
  7. Glaser, N., Liu, Y.C., Tian, J., Kira, Z.: Overcoming obstructions via bandwidth-limited multi-agent spatial handshaking. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2406–2413. IEEE (2021) · DOI
  8. Guo, Y., Wang, H., Hu, Q., Liu, H., Liu, L., Bennamoun, M.: Deep learning for 3D point clouds: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 43(12), 4338–4364 (2020) · DOI
  9. Jiang, D., Delgrossi, L.: IEEE 802.11p: towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments. VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 2036–2040 (2008) · DOI
  10. Lee, K., Kim, J., Park, Y., Wang, H., Hong, D.: Latency of cellular-based V2X: perspectives on TTI-proportional latency and TTI-independent latency. IEEE Access 5, 15800–15809 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2731777 · DOI
  11. Li, Y., An, Z., Wang, Z., Zhong, Y., Chen, S., Feng, C.: V2X-Sim: a virtual collaborative perception dataset for autonomous driving. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. (2022) · DOI
  12. Li, Y., Ren, S., Wu, P., Chen, S., Feng, C., Zhang, W.: Learning distilled collaboration graph for multi-agent perception. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021)
  13. Liu, Y.C., Tian, J., Glaser, N., Kira, Z.: When2com: multi-agent perception via communication graph grouping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4106–4115 (2020) · DOI
  14. Liu, Y.C., Tian, J., Ma, C.Y., Glaser, N., Kuo, C.W., Kira, Z.: Who2com: collaborative perception via learnable handshake communication. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 6876–6883. IEEE (2020) · DOI
  15. Mei, J., Zheng, K., Zhao, L., Teng, Y., Wang, X.: A latency and reliability guaranteed resource allocation scheme for LTE v2v communication systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 17, 3850–3860 (2018) · DOI
  16. Oliu, M., Selva, J., Escalera, S.: Folded recurrent neural networks for future video prediction. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp. 716–731 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19839-7 · DOI
  17. Qi, C.R., Yi, L., Su, H., Guibas, L.J.: PointNet++: deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017)
  18. Shi, S., et al.: PV-RCNN: point-voxel feature set abstraction for 3D object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10529–10538 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Shi, S., Wang, X., Li, H.: PointRCNN: 3D object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–779 (2019) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.Y., Wong, W.K., Woo, W.C.: Convolutional LSTM network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (2015)
  21. Su, J., Byeon, W., Kossaifi, J., Huang, F., Kautz, J., Anandkumar, A.: Convolutional Tensor-train LSTM for Spatio-temporal learning. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 13714–13726 (2020)
  22. Vadivelu, N., Ren, M., Tu, J., Wang, J., Urtasun, R.: Learning to communicate and correct pose errors. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 1195–1210. PMLR (2021)
  23. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Guyon, I., et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017)
  24. Wang, T.-H., Manivasagam, S., Liang, M., Yang, B., Zeng, W., Urtasun, R.: V2VNet: vehicle-to-vehicle communication for joint perception and prediction. In: Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, J.-M. (eds.) ECCV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12347, pp. 605–621. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_36 · DOI
  25. Wang, Y., Gao, Z., Long, M., Wang, J., Philip, S.Y.: PredRNN++: towards a resolution of the deep-in-time dilemma in spatiotemporal predictive learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5123–5132. PMLR (2018)
  26. Wang, Y., Jiang, L., Yang, M.H., Li, L.J., Long, M., Fei-Fei, L.: Eidetic 3D LSTM: a model for video prediction and beyond. In: ICLR (2019)
  27. Wang, Y., Long, M., Wang, J., Gao, Z., Yu, P.S.: PredRNN: recurrent neural networks for predictive learning using spatiotemporal LSTMs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017)
  28. Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhu, H., Long, M., Wang, J., Yu, P.S.: Memory in memory: a predictive neural network for learning higher-order non-stationarity from spatiotemporal dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9154–9162 (2019) · DOI
  29. Wu, P., Chen, S., Metaxas, D.N.: MotionNet: joint perception and motion prediction for autonomous driving based on bird’s eye view maps. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11385–11395 (2020) · DOI
  30. Yin, T., Zhou, X., Krahenbuhl, P.: Center-based 3D object detection and tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11784–11793 (2021) · DOI
  31. Yu, H., et al.: DAIR-V2X: A large-scale dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative 3D object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21361–21370 (2022) · DOI · Paper page
  32. Yuan, Y., Sester, M.: Comap: a synthetic dataset for collective multi-agent perception of autonomous driving. Int. Arc. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 43, 255–263 (2021) · DOI
  33. Yuan, Y., Cheng, H., Sester, M.: Keypoints-based deep feature fusion for cooperative vehicle detection of autonomous driving. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 7(2), 3054–3061 (2022) · DOI
  34. Zhang, X., et al.: EMP: edge-assisted multi-vehicle perception. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 545–558 (2021) · DOI
  35. Zhao, H., Jiang, L., Jia, J., Torr, P.H., Koltun, V.: Point transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 16259–16268 (2021) · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lei, Z., Ren, S., Hu, Y., Zhang, W., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Siheng
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
316-332
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4312571135
Cited by
147
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 1
FWCI
30.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21511100900, 62171276, 2021ZD0112801, 2021-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
cooperative perception, communication delay, latency compensation, feature attention, temporal modulation, autonomous driving, multi-agent perception, safety-critical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review