Cited by 8Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionText and Document Classification TechnologiesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

A Novel Multimodal Hybrid Classifier Based Cyberbullying Detection for Social Media Platform

Suhas Bharadwaj, R., Kuzhalvaimozhi, S., Vedavathi, N.·2023·Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-21438-7_57

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suhas Bharadwaj, R., Kuzhalvaimozhi, S., & Vedavathi, N.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Published
2023
Pages
689-699
ISSN
  • 2367-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3389
OpenAlex
W4313532091
Cited by
8
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in networks and systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, social media, extreme learning machine, convolutional neural networks, tweets, hashtags, text classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review