CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Pragmatism in Philosophy and EducationEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pragmatism, Problem Solving, and Strategies for Engaged Philosophy

Brister, Evelyn·2023·The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-37484-5_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-37484-5_2

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brister, Evelyn, and Robert Frodeman. 2020b. A Guide to Field Philosophy: Case Studies and Practical Strategies. New York: Routledge. · DOI
  2. Dewey, John. 1981. Experience and Nature. The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 1, ed. J.A. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  3. Dewey, John. 1996. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 4, ed. J.A. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  4. Dewey, John. 2008. Reconstruction in Philosophy. The Middle Works, 1899–1924, vol. 12, ed. J.A. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  5. Lake, Danielle, and Paul Thompson. 2018. Philosopher-as-Liaison?: Lessons from Sustainable Knowledge and American Philosophy. Dewey Studies 2 (1): 10–41.
  6. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1986. The Fixation of Belief. In Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. 3. ed. C. Kloesel, M. Fisch, D. Roberts, et al., 242–257. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  7. Thompson, Paul B. 2003. The Environmental Ethics Case for Crop Biotechnology: Putting Science Back into Environmental Practice. In Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice. ed. A. Light, and A. de-Shalit, 187–217. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Thompson, Paul B. 2017a. Analytic vs. Pragmatist Food Ethics: Method and Approach. Pragmatism Today 8(2): 10–23.
  9. Tiberius, Valerie. 2017. The Well-Being of Philosophy. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 91: 65–86.
  10. Tremblay, Paul R. 1999. The New Casuistry. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 12: 489–542.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Brister, E.
Affiliations
Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Brister, Evelyn
ORCID
Brister, Evelyn
Venue
The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2023
Pages
17-32
ISSN
  • 1570-3010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2215-1737
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-37484-5_2
OpenAlex
W4390474723
Cited by
5
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
21.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
The international library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics/The International library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
pragmatism, applied philosophy, problem solving, Paul Thompson, agricultural ethics, social problems, miscommunication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review