Cited by 46Digital Media Forensic DetectionFace recognition and analysisMisinformation and Its Impacts

GBDF: Gender Balanced DeepFake Dataset Towards Fair DeepFake Detection

Open access
Nadimpalli, Aakash Varma, Rattani, Ajita·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-37742-6_25

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing unimodal deepfake detectors are primarily designed to detect a single type of manipulation, such as visual, acoustic, and text.

    “Existing unimodal deepfake detectors are primarily designed to detect a single type of manipulation, such as visual, acoustic, and text.”
  • A key reason for the disparity in detection accuracy across demographic groups is that how often different demographic groups appear in the training data is imbalanced.

    “A key reason for this disparity is that how often different demographic groups appear in the training data is imbalanced [16].”

    From Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The work in [16] showed significant bias in both datasets and detection models and tried to reduce performance bias across genders by providing a gender-balanced dataset.

    “The work in [16] showed significant bias in both datasets and detection models and they tried to reduce the performance bias across genders by providing a gender-balanced dataset.”

    From Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nadimpalli, A. V., & Rattani, A.
Affiliations
Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rattani, Ajita
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2023
Pages
320-337
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4385466340
Cited by
46
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake detection, gender equity, data annotation, demographic bias, misinformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review