The deepfake detection challenge (dfdc) dataset
Open accessAbstract
Deepfakes are a recent off-the-shelf manipulation technique that allows anyone to swap two identities in a single video. In addition to Deepfakes, a variety of GAN-based face swapping methods have also been published with accompanying code. To counter this emerging threat, we have constructed an extremely large face swap video dataset to enable the training of detection models, and organized the accompanying DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Kaggle competition. Importantly, all recorded subjects agreed to participate in and have their likenesses modified during the construction of the face-swapped dataset. The DFDC dataset is by far the largest currently and publicly available face swap video dataset, with over 100,000 total clips sourced from 3,426 paid actors, produced with several Deepfake, GAN-based, and non-learned methods. In addition to describing the methods used to construct the dataset, we provide a detailed analysis of the top submissions from the Kaggle contest. We show although Deepfake detection is extremely difficult and still an unsolved problem, a Deepfake detection model trained only on the DFDC can generalize to real "in-the-wild" Deepfake videos, and such a model can be a valuable analysis tool when analyzing potentially Deepfaked videos. Training, validation and testing corpuses can be downloaded from https://ai.facebook.com/datasets/dfdc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facebook hosted the DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) in December 2019 with 2114 worldwide participants generating more than 35,000 models.
“Facebook fosters the development of high-performance DeepFake detection tools by hosting the DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) (Dolhansky et al. 2020) in December 2019 with 2114 worldwide participants generating more than 35,000 models.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
The Abstract (p. 1) says the authors organized the DFDC Kaggle competition, and §6.1 (p. 10) reports 2,114 participating teams—not necessarily 2,114 individual participants. Our copy does not substantiate the December 2019 date, worldwide participation, or the claim that participants generated more than 35,000 models. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe datasets used by DFDC and DeeperForensics Challenge are significantly larger than previous datasets, with 100,000 videos and 100,000,000 frames.
“The dataset DeeperForensics-1.0 (Jiang et al. 2020b) and DFDC (Dolhansky et al. 2020) used by these two challenges are significantly larger than the previous datasets. They have 100,000 videos and 100,000,000 numbers of frames.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
The Abstract (p. 1) reports over 100,000 DFDC clips, and Previous work (p. 3) describes DFDC and DeeperForensics-1.0 as larger than earlier dataset generations. But the comparison table on p. 3 lists 60,000 total videos for DeeperForensics-1.0, not 100,000, and the cited passages do not substantiate the claimed 100,000,000 frames. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDFDC has 128,514 videos, over 100,000 total clips sourced from 3426 actors.
“The DFDC is a publicly-available face swap video dataset, with 128,514 videos, over 100,000 total clips sourced from 3426 actors.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
The Introduction (p. 2) says the source footage came from 3,426 paid actors, and Dataset contents (p. 6) reports more than 100,000 clips. But Future work (p. 10) says only 960 of the roughly 3,500 original identities were included in the dataset, so 3,426 is a source-footage count, not a count of actors represented in DFDC. The paper’s dataset counts do not establish the claimed total of 128,514 videos. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting detection methods struggle to recognize Deepfakes generated by newer synthesis techniques.
“many existing detection methods struggle to recognize Deepfakes, synthetic facial images and videos, generated by newer synthesis techniques [8, 12, 26, 27, 43, 54].”
From Towards More General Video-based Deepfake Detection through Facial Component Guided Adaptation for Foundation Model (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Section 6.2 (p. 10) reports that detection performance dropped on real, in-the-wild videos compared with DFDC videos. That supports the general point that detectors struggle, but the paper does not establish that newer synthesis techniques caused the difficulty. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredML-based detection approaches incorporate conventional machine learning techniques, and identifying patterns, anomalies, or inconsistencies in media information is typically accomplished using statistical models and algorithms.
“ML-based detection approaches incorporate conventional machine learning techniques. Identifying patterns, anomalies, or inconsistencies in media information is typically accomplished using statistical models and algorithms (Dolhansky etal. 2020).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
The Introduction (p. 1) describes computer-vision and multimodal models for detecting deepfakes, and the analysis of submitted models (p. 10) describes models used for feature extraction and detection. The paper does not establish that detection typically uses conventional machine-learning or statistical models to identify patterns, anomalies, or inconsistencies in media generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The DFDC full dataset contains 128,154 face videos of 960 subjects, including 23,654 real videos from 3,426 paid actors and 104,500 deepfake videos created using eight different methods.
“DFDC (Deepfake Detection Challenge) full dataset (Dolhansky et al., 2020): This dataset contains 128,154 face videos of 960 subjects, including 23,654 real videos from 3,426 paid actors and 104,500 deepfake videos created using eight different methods (DF-128, DF-256, MM/NN face swap, NTH, FSGAN, StyleGAN, refinement, and audio swap).”
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al., 2020
Dataset contents (p. 6) gives the training and validation counts and says that the DFDC portion of the private test set was released; these figures support the total of 128,154 clips, but the passage does not establish the claimed exact split of 23,654 real and 104,500 deepfake clips. Source data (p. 4) reports 3,426 recruited subjects, while Future work (p. 10) says only 960 identities were included. Previous work (p. 3) lists the eight methods, but Audio (p. 5) says audio swaps were not considered deepfakes for the competition, so describing all eight as methods that created the deepfake videos overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe three datasets FaceForensics++, Celeb-DF, and DeeperForensics-1.0 can be broken down into three generations according to factors such as age, scale, and visual quality: first (FaceForensics++), second (Celeb-DF), and third (DeeperForensics-1.0).
“These datasets can be broken down into three generations [10] according to factors such as age, scale, and visual quality: first (FaceForensics++), second (Celeb-DF), and third (DeeperForensics-1.0).”
From WaveConViT: Wavelet-Based Convolutional Vision Transformer for Cross-Manipulation Deepfake Video Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe evolution of deepfake datasets has closely followed advances in generative AI, transitioning from early GAN and VAE-based techniques to sophisticated Diffusion Models.
“The evolution of deepfake datasets has closely followed advances in generative AI, transitioning from early GAN and VAE-based techniques [21], [22], [24], [25] to sophisticated Diffusion Models (DM) [32], [33], [34].”
From Evolving from Single-modal to Multi-modal Facial Deepfake Detection: Progress and Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
The Abstract (p. 1) says the DFDC dataset includes GAN-based methods, and Methods (p. 4) describes a convolutional autoencoder used for face swaps. It does not identify that autoencoder as a VAE, so the VAE-specific part of the phrase attributed to this source is unsupported. The diffusion-model portion is attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting deepfake benchmarks focus on their own datasets, without offering a standardized way to handle data across different datasets.
“While these benchmarking methodologies have made significant contributions, they specifically focus on their own datasets, without offering a standardized way to handle data across different datasets”
From DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes a benchmark competition using the DFDC dataset, and Large scale benchmarking (p. 9) describes evaluation on its public and private test sets. That supports the dataset-specific aspect of the claim. The paper does not assess whether existing benchmarks offer a standardized way to handle data across different datasets. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere have been two famous DeepFake challenges: DFDC and DeeperForensics Challenge 2020.
“In recent years, there have been two famous DeepFake challenge: DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) (Dolhansky et al. 2020) and DeeperForensics Challenge 2020 (Jiang et al. 2021a).”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
Neekhara et al. (2021) find that input-preprocessing steps and face detection methods across DeepFake detectors make adversarial transferability difficult.
“Neekhara et al. (2021) further study the adversarial attack-based evasion methods on the more challenging DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) dataset (Dolhansky et al. 2020) and find that the input-preprocessing steps, as well as face detection methods across DeepFake detectors, make the adversarial transferability difficult.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
The comparison is fair because SOTA methods were trained on specified datasets and training/test data do not overlap.
“In order to ensure a fair comparison, Seferbekov, FTCN, LipForensics and Real Forensics are all trained on the FaceForensics++ dataset [49], which includes different types of facial manipulation (both FS and FR). MDS-based FD and Joint AV are trained on DFDC [18], which includes also audio manipulations. ICT is trained on a publicly available data-set of pristine faces of 1 million identities, MS-”
From Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
The DFDC dataset provides more than 100,000 videos with varying manipulation techniques and diverse lighting conditions.
“DFDC provides more than 100,000 videos (real and fake) with varying manipulation techniques (e.g., face swaps) and diverse lighting conditions.”
From Comprehensive Evaluation of Deepfake Detection Models: Accuracy, Generalization, and Resilience to Adversarial Attacks (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Dolhansky et al. proposed the Deep Fake dataset (DFDC).
“They proposed the Deep Fake dataset (DFDC).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
Most recent deepfake datasets are considered third-generation datasets.
“Now, most recent deepfake datasets are considered third-generation datasets (Dolhansky etal. 2020).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
The DFDC dataset is the largest Deepfake dataset currently accessible and one of the only datasets to include video recorded to be used in machine learning applications.
“DFDC dataset is the largest Deepfake dataset currently accessible and one of the only datasets to include video recorded to be used in machine learning applications (Dolhansky etal. 2020).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2020
Most available datasets provide examples of face manipulations through either face swapping or face reenactment techniques.
“Most of the available datasets provide examples of face manipulations through either face swapping [16, 34, 77] or face reenactment [31, 35] techniques.”
From AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake Dataset (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Several large-scale datasets such as DFDC, DeeperForensics, KoDF, and DF-Platter have been proposed.
“With the rapid advancements in content generation technology, several large-scale datasets such as DFDC [16], DeeperForensics [28], KoDF [35], and DF-Platter [41] have been proposed.”
From AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake Dataset (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
On a sample of 166 videos from the Deepfake Detection Contest, people are significantly better than chance but far from perfect at discerning whether an unknown actor's face has been visually manipulated by a deepfake algorithm.
“On a sample of 166 videos from the largest publicly available dataset of deepfake videos to date from the Deepfake Detection Contest (DFDC)48, people are significantly better than chance but far from perfect at discerning whether an unknown actor’s face has been visually manipulated by a deepfake algorithm49.”
From Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Media were sourced from various datasets including DFDC, PEFS, TMC, FaceForensics++, and Celeb-DF.
“Media were sourced from various datasets including DFDC [9], Perceptual Experiments on Face Swaps (PEFS) [19], trusted media challenge (TMC) [20], FaceForensics++ + [21], and Celeb-DF [10].”
From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
PPO outperformed DQN because, as an on-policy algorithm, PPO tackles sample efficiency by employing surrogate objectives to keep the new policy from drifting too much from the old policy.
“The reason is as an on-policy algorithm, PPO tackles the problem of sample efficiency by employing surrogate objectives to keep the new policy from drifting too much from the old policy [27].”
From On Improving Cross-dataset Generalization of Deepfake Detectors (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
The Results (p. 8) compare methods for producing deepfake videos, and the model analysis (p. 10) evaluates deepfake detectors. Searches for PPO, DQN, sample efficiency, and surrogate policy objectives found no passage addressing the cited explanation. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380 · see citing works
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072 · see citing works
A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks
Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00453 · Cited by 11,714 · see citing works
Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset
Carreira, J., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.502 · Cited by 9,570 · see citing works
Joint Face Detection and Alignment Using Multitask Cascaded Convolutional Networks
Zhang, K., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., & Qiao, Y. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2603342 · Cited by 6,214 · see citing works
mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization
Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y. N., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09412 · Cited by 5,831 · see citing works
SlowFast Networks for Video Recognition
Feichtenhofer, C., Fan, H., Malik, J., & He, K. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00630 · Cited by 4,007 · see citing works
FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314 · see citing works
Celeb-DF: A Large-Scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00327 · Cited by 1,846 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Furthermore, as we observed that many publicly-released datasets [14, 17, 18, 23, 30] did not guarantee that their subjects were willing participants or agreed to have their faces modified, we solicited video data from 3,426 paid actors and actresses speaking in a variety of settings for roughly 15 minutes each.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Poses
Yang, X., Li, Y., & Lyu, S. (2019) · ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8683164 · Cited by 1,196 · see citing works
Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview
Verdoliva, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.3002101 · Cited by 979 · see citing works
Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3213954 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactment
Nirkin, Y., Keller, Y., & Hassner, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00728 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Few-Shot Adversarial Learning of Realistic Neural Talking Head Models
Zakharov, E., Shysheya, A., Burkov, E., & Lempitsky, V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00955 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detection
Jiang, L., Li, R., Wu, W., Qian, C., & Loy, C. C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00296 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detection
Korshunov, P., & Marcel, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.08685 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Dataset
Dolhansky, B., Howes, R., Pflaum, B., Baram, N., & Ferrer, C. C. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.08854 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Self-citationHu, T., Qi, H., Huang, Q., & Lu, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.09891 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence, Deepfakes and a Future of Ectypes
Floridi, L. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0325-3 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
A Brief History of Motion Capture for Computer Character Animation
Sturman, D. J. (1994) · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Facial Action Transfer with Personalized Bilinear Regression
Huang, D., & la Torre, F. D. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_11 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
TTS Skins: Speaker Conversion via ASR
Polyak, A., Wolf, L., & Taigman, Y. (2020) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2020-1416 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Fake photographs : making truths in photography
Jolly, M. (2003) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection
Zhao, H., Wei, T., Zhou, W., Zhang, W., Chen, D., & Yu, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00222 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In the Wild
Prajwal, K. R., Mukhopadhyay, R., Namboodiri, V. P., & Jawahar, C. V. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413532 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Masood, M., Nawaz, M., Malik, K. M., Javed, A., Irtaza, A., & Malik, H. (2023) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03766-z · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detection
Haliassos, A., Vougioukas, K., Petridis, S., & Pantic, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00500 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Dynamic Neural Radiance Fields for Monocular 4D Facial Avatar Reconstruction
Gafni, G., Thies, J., Zollhöfer, M., & Nießner, M. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00854 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Images
Shiohara, K., & Yamasaki, T. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01816 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M. (2022) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
End-to-End Reconstruction-Classification Learning for Face Forgery Detection
Cao, J., Ma, C., Yao, T., Chen, S., Ding, S., & Yang, X. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00408 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detection
Zhao, T., Xu, X., Xu, M., Ding, H., Xiong, Y., & Xia, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01475 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
M2TR: Multi-modal Multi-scale Transformers for Deepfake Detection
Wang, J., Wu, Z., Ouyang, W., Han, X., Chen, J., Jiang, Y.-G., & Li, S.-N. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3512527.3531415 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detection
Zheng, Y., Bao, J., Chen, D., Zeng, M., & Wen, F. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01477 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Deep Gait Recognition: A Survey
Sepas‐Moghaddam, A., & Etemad, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3151865 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
DeepFake Detection for Human Face Images and Videos: A Survey
Malik, A., Kuribayashi, M., Abdullahi, S. M., & Khan, A. N. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3151186 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Combining EfficientNet and Vision Transformers for Video Deepfake Detection
Coccomini, D. A., Messina, N., Gennaro, C., & Falchi, F. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06433-3_19 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
A Survey on Deepfake Video Detection
Yu, P., Xia, Z., Fei, J., & Lu, Y. (2021) · IET Biometrics · doi:10.1049/bme2.12031 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds
Groh, M., Epstein, Z., Firestone, C., & Picard, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2110013119 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
ID-Reveal: Identity-aware DeepFake Video Detection
Cozzolino, D., Rossler, A., Thies, J., Niesner, M., & Verdoliva, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01483 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examples
Hussain, S., Neekhara, P., Jere, M., Koushanfar, F., & McAuley, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00339 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities
Kaur, A., Noori Hoshyar, A., Saikrishna, V., Firmin, S., & Xia, F. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10810-6 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Dual Contrastive Learning for General Face Forgery Detection
Sun, K., Yao, T., Chen, S., Ding, S., Li, J., & Ji, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i2.20130 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
An improved dense cnn architecture for deepfake image detection
Patel, Y., Tanwar, S., Bhattacharya, P., Gupta, R., Alsuwian, T., Davidson, I. E., & Mazibuko, T. F. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3251417 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon
Juefei-Xu, F., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Guo, Q., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01606-8 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
AVoiD-DF: Audio-Visual Joint Learning for Detecting Deepfake
Yang, W., Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Guo, B., Ba, Z., Xia, Z., Cao, X., & Ren, K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3262148 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Ilyas, H., Javed, A., & Malik, K. M. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110124 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Deepfake generation and detection: Case study and challenges
Patel, Y., Tanwar, S., Gupta, R., Bhattacharya, P., Davidson, I. E., Nyameko, R., Aluvala, S., & Vimal, V. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3342107 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
MTD-Net: Learning to Detect Deepfakes Images by Multi-Scale Texture Difference
Yang, J., Li, A., Xiao, S., Lu, W., & Gao, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2021.3102487 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Leveraging Real Talking Faces via Self-Supervision for Robust Forgery Detection
Haliassos, A., Mira, R., Petridis, S., & Pantic, M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01453 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Implicit Identity Driven Deepfake Face Swapping Detection
Huang, B.-J., Wang, Z.-Y., Yang, J.-F., Ai, J., Zou, Q., Wang, Q., & Ye, D.-P. (2023) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00436 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can
Köbis, N. C., Doležalová, B., & Soraperra, I. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103364 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Zhou, T., Wang, W., Liang, Z., & Shen, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00572 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Luo, Y., Lyu, S., Liu, Q., & Wu, B. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00858 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
KoDF: A Large-scale Korean DeepFake Detection Dataset
Kwon, P., You, J., Nam, G., Park, S., & Chae, G. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01057 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
A Hybrid CNN-LSTM model for Video Deepfake Detection by Leveraging Optical Flow Features
Saikia, P., Dholaria, D., Yadav, P., Patel, V., & Roy, M. (2022) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892905 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, M. C., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., & Nahavandi, S. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12731039.v1 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Typology of Risks of Generative Text-to-Image Models
Bird, C., Ungless, E., & Kasirzadeh, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604722 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Detect and locate: Exposing face manipulation by semantic-and noise-level telltales
Kong, C., Chen, B., Li, H., Wang, S., Rocha, A., & Kwong, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3169921 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
PointCutMix: Regularization strategy for point cloud classification
Zhang, J., Chen, L., Ouyang, B., Liu, B., Zhu, J., Chen, Y., Meng, Y., & Wu, D. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.049 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Adversarial Threats to DeepFake Detection: A Practical Perspective
Neekhara, P., Dolhansky, B., Bitton, J., & Ferrer, C. C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00103 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationFakeAVCeleb: A Novel Audio-Video Multimodal Deepfake Dataset
Khalid, H., Tariq, S., Kim, M., & Woo, S. S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05080 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Abbas, F., & Taeihagh, A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124260 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Improving Generalization by Commonality Learning in Face Forgery Detection
Yu, P., Fei, J., Xia, Z., Zhou, Z., & Weng, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3146781 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Deepfake Detection: A Comprehensive Survey from the Reliability Perspective
Wang, T., Liao, X., Chow, K. P., Lin, X., & Wang, Y. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3699710 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
A History of Artificial Intelligence
Grzybowski, A. E., Pawlikowska‐Łagód, K., & Lambert, W. C. (2024) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.12.016 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Green learning: Introduction, examples and outlook
Kuo, C. ‐. J., & Madni, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.103685 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection
Cozzolino, D., Pianese, A., Nießner, M., & Verdoliva, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00101 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Evaluation of an Audio-Video Multimodal Deepfake Dataset using Unimodal and Multimodal Detectors
Khalid, H., Kim, M., Tariq, S., & Woo, S. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Synthetic Multimedia - Audiovisual Deepfake Generation and Detection · doi:10.1145/3476099.3484315 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Patwa, P., Bhardwaj, M., Guptha, V., Kumari, G., Sharma, S., Pykl, S., Das, A., Ekbal, A., Akhtar, M. S., & Chakraborty, T. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73696-5_5 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
TALL: Thumbnail Layout for Deepfake Video Detection
Xu, Y., Liang, J., Jia, G., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & He, R. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.02071 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
DeepPrivacy2: Towards Realistic Full-Body Anonymization
Hukkelås, H., & Lindseth, F. (2023) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00138 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Ganguly, S., Ganguly, A., Mohiuddin, S., Malakar, S., & Sarkar, R. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118423 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Lyu, S., & Wu, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01426 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Users can choose from a list of supported dataset names such as FaceForensics++ [33], Celeb-DF-v1 [23], Celeb-DF-v2 [23], DFDCP [11], DFDC [10], DeeperForensics-1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCai, Z., Stefanov, K., Dhall, A., & Hayat, M. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) · doi:10.1109/dicta56598.2022.10034605 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Exposing the Deception: Uncovering More Forgery Clues for Deepfake Detection
Ba, Z., Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Wu, S., Lin, F., Lü, L., & Ren, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27829 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Detecting Deepfake Voice Using Explainable Deep Learning Techniques
Lim, S.-Y., Chae, D.-K., & Lee, S.-C. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12083926 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation
Shao, R., Wu, T., & Liu, Z. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00667 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Chen, H., Lin, Y., Li, B., & Tan, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2022.3209336 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Do Deepfakes Feel Emotions? A Semantic Approach to Detecting Deepfakes Via Emotional Inconsistencies
Hosler, B., Salvi, D., Murray, A., Antonacci, F., Bestagini, P., Tubaro, S., & Stamm, M. C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00112 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
MRE-Net: Multi-Rate Excitation Network for Deepfake Video Detection
Pang, G., Zhang, B., Teng, Z., Qi, Z., & Jianping Fan, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3239607 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
AUNet: Learning Relations Between Action Units for Face Forgery Detection
Bai, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, B., & Hu, W. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02367 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video
Groh, M., Sankaranarayanan, A., Singh, N., Kim, D. Y., Lippman, A., & Picard, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z · Cited by 89 · see citing works
An efficient deepfake video detection using robust deep learning
Qadir, A., Mahum, R., El-Meligy, M. A., Ragab, A. E., AlSalman, A., & Awais, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25757 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Qureshi, S. M., Saeed, A., Almotiri, S. H., Ahmad, F., & Al Ghamdi, M. A. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2037 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Shaaban, O. A., Yıldırım, R., & Alguttar, A. A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3333866 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countries
Umbach, R., Henry, N., Beard, G. F., & Berryessa, C. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642382 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Usman, M. T., Khan, H., Singh, S. K., Lee, M. Y., & Koo, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3476477 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
A Continual Deepfake Detection Benchmark: Dataset, Methods, and Essentials
Li, C., Huang, Z., Paudel, D. P., Wang, Y., Shahbazi, M., Hong, X., & Gool, L. V. (2023) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00139 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
TIMIT-TTS: A Text-to-Speech Dataset for Multimodal Synthetic Media Detection
Salvi, D., Hosler, B., Bestagini, P., Stamm, M. C., & Tubaro, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3276480 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review
Altuncu, E., Franqueira, V. N. L., & Li, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1400024 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
DeepFake on Face and Expression Swap: A Review
Waseem, S., Abu Bakar, S. A. R. S., Ahmed, B. A., Omar, Z., Eisa, T. A. E., & Dalam, M. E. E. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3324403 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Peng, C., Miao, Z., Liu, D., Wang, N., Hu, R., & Gao, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3381823 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Unsupervised Learning-Based Framework for Deepfake Video Detection
Zhang, L., Qiao, T., Xu, M., Zheng, N., & Xie, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2022.3182509 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detection
(2024) · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00459 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
On Improving Cross-dataset Generalization of Deepfake Detectors
Nadimpalli, A. V., & Rattani, A. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00019 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cai, Z., Ghosh, S., Dhall, A., Gedeon, T., Stefanov, K., & Hayat, M. (2023) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2023.103818 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Augmented Multi-Scale Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Magnifier for Generalized DeepFake Detection
Yu, Y., Zhao, X., Ni, R., Yang, S., Zhao, Y., & Kot, A. C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3237322 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Ramadhani, K. N., Munir, R., & Utama, N. P. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3352890 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Exploiting Complementary Dynamic Incoherence for DeepFake Video Detection
Wang, H., Liu, Z., & Wang, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3238517 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Review of audio deepfake detection techniques: Issues and prospects
Dixit, A., Kaur, N., & Kingra, S. (2023) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13322 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
MCL: Multimodal Contrastive Learning for Deepfake Detection
Liu, X., Yu, Y., Li, X., & Zhao, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3312738 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation and Beyond
Shao, R., Wu, T., Wu, J., Nie, L., & Liu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3367749 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Video deepfake detection using Particle Swarm Optimization improved deep neural networks
Cunha, L., Li, Z., Sowan, B. I., Lim, C. P., & Kong, Y. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-09536-x · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Don't trust your eyes: image manipulation in the age of DeepFakes
Langguth, J., Pogorelov, K., Brenner, S., Filkuková, P., & Schroeder, D. T. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.632317 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
MSVT: Multiple Spatiotemporal Views Transformer for DeepFake Video Detection
Yu, Y., Ni, R., Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Xia, F., Jiang, N., & Zhao, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3281448 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake Dataset
Cai, Z., Ghosh, S., Adatia, A. P., Hayat, M., Dhall, A., Gedeon, T., & Stefanov, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3664647.3680795 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
FaceSigns: Semi-fragile Watermarks for Media Authentication
Neekhara, P., Hussain, S., Zhang, X., Huang, K., McAuley, J., & Koushanfar, F. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3640466 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Analyzing Fairness in Deepfake Detection With Massively Annotated Databases
Xu, Y., Terhörst, P., Pedersen, M., & Raja, K. B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2024.3365421 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Image forgery detection: comprehensive review of digital forensics approaches
Singh, S. P., & Kumar, R. (2024) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00265-8 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
A Review of Deepfake Techniques: Architecture, Detection and Datasets
Edwards, P., Nebel, J.-C., Greenhill, D., & Liang, X. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3477257 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning
Korshunov, P., & Marcel, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science · doi:10.1109/tbiom.2022.3143404 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Lyu, S., & Wu, B. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-0201 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Deepfakes Classification of Faces Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Sharma, J., Sharma, S., Kumar, V., Hussein, H. S., & Alshazly, H. A. (2022) · Traitement du signal · doi:10.18280/ts.390330 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Contrastive learning-based general Deepfake detection with multi-scale RGB frequency clues
Dong, F., Zou, X., Wang, J., & Liu, X. (2023) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.03.005 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Khan, S. A., & Dang-Nguyen, D.-T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3348450 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Deepfake Detection with Deep Learning: Convolutional Neural Networks versus Transformers
Thing, V. L. L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) · doi:10.1109/csr57506.2023.10225004 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
SeeABLE: Soft Discrepancies and Bounded Contrastive Learning for Exposing Deepfakes
Larue, N., Vu, N., Štruc, V., Peer, P., & Christophides, V. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01921 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Fully Unsupervised Deepfake Video Detection Via Enhanced Contrastive Learning
Qiao, T., Xie, S., Chen, Y., Retraint, F., & Luo, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3356814 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Cross-Forgery Analysis of Vision Transformers and CNNs for Deepfake Image Detection
Coccomini, D. A., Caldelli, R., Falchi, F., Gennaro, C., & Amato, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia AI against Disinformation · doi:10.1145/3512732.3533582 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Deepfake Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Rana, M. S., Murali, B., & Sung, A. H. (2021) · IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) · doi:10.1109/iiai-aai53430.2021.00079 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
GBDF: Gender Balanced DeepFake Dataset Towards Fair DeepFake Detection
Nadimpalli, A. V., & Rattani, A. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37742-6_25 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dolhansky, B., Bitton, J., Pflaum, B., Lu, J., Howes, R., Wang, M., & Ferrer, C. C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2006.07397
- OpenAlex
- W3095986900
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- TIB Data Manager
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, face swapping, video manipulation, DFDC, synthetic video dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
