Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Solving the IoT Cascading Failure Dilemma Using a Semantic Multi-agent System

Guittoum, Amal, Aïssaoui, François, Bolle, Sébastien, Boyer, Fabienne, De Palma, Noel·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_18
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_18

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Aïssaoui, F., Berlemont, S., Douet, M., Mezghani, E.: A semantic model toward smart IoT device management. In: Barolli, L., Amato, F., Moscato, F., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds.) Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications, pp. 640–650. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_59 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_59
  2. Ali, N., Hong, J.E.: Failure detection and prevention for cyber-physical systems using ontology-based knowledge base. Computers 7(4) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers7040068. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/7/4/68 · doi:10.3390/computers7040068
  3. Alsabilah, N., Rawat, D.B.: Anomaly detection in smart home networks using Kalman filter. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp. 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS51825.2021.9484507 · doi:10.1109/infocomwkshps51825.2021.9484507
  4. Benazzouz, Y., Keir Aktouf, O.E., Parissis, I.: A fault fuzzy-ontology for large scale fault-tolerant wireless sensor networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 35, 203–212 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.100. Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems 18th Annual Conference, KES-2014 Gdynia, Poland, September 2014 Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.100
  5. Boissier, O., Bordini, R., Hubner, J., Ricci, A.: Multi-Agent Oriented Programming: Programming Multi-Agent Systems Using JaCaMo. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents Series. MIT Press (2020)
  6. Borhani, A., Zarandi, H.R.: Thingsdnd: IoT device failure detection and diagnosis for multi-user smart homes. In: 2022 18th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC), pp. 113–116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC57035.2022.00028. Fault detection on sensors in smart home settings · doi:10.1109/edcc57035.2022.00028
  7. Bratman, M.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)
  8. Celik, Z.B., Tan, G., Mcdaniel, P.: Iotguard: dynamic enforcement of security and safety policy in commodity IoT. In: Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (2019) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chakraborty, T., et al.: Fall-curve: a novel primitive for IoT fault detection and isolation. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys 2018, pp. 95–107. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274783.3274853 · DOI
  10. Chen, Y., Zhen, Z., Yu, H., Xu, J.: Application of fault tree analysis and fuzzy neural networks to fault diagnosis in the internet of things (IoT) for aquaculture. Sensors 17(1) (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010153 · DOI
  11. Chi, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, Z.J., Yu, F.R., Leung, V.C.M.: Knowledge-based fault diagnosis in industrial internet of things: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 9(15), 12886–12900 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3163606 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chi, Y., Wang, Z.J., Leung, V.C.M.: Distributed knowledge inference framework for intelligent fault diagnosis in IIoT systems. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 9(5), 3152–3165 (2022) · DOI
  13. Emmanouilidis, C., Gregori, M., Al-Shdifat, A.: Context ontology development for connected maintenance services. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(2), 10923–10928 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2833. 21st IFAC World Congress · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2833
  14. Guittoum, A., et al.: Inferring threatening IoT dependencies using semantic digital twins toward collaborative IoT device management. In: Proceedings of the 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. SAC 2023. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3555776.3578573 · doi:10.1145/3555776.3578573
  15. Gupta, H., Dastjerdi, A.V., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: iFogSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in internet of things, edge and fog computing environments (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jia, Y., et al.: Who’s in control? On security risks of disjointed IoT device management channels. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2021, pp. 1289–1305. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021) · doi:10.1145/3460120.3484592
  17. Kapitanova, K., Hoque, E., Stankovic, J.A., Whitehouse, K., Son, S.H.: Being smart about failures: assessing repairs in smart homes. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2012, pp. 51–60. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370225 · doi:10.1145/2370216.2370225
  18. Kodeswaran, P., Kokku, R., Sen, S., Srivatsa, M.: Idea: a system for efficient failure management in smart IoT environments. In: MobiSys 2016 - Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services pp. 43–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2906388.2906406 · DOI
  19. Lazarova-Molnar, S., Shaker, H.R., Mohamed, N., Jorgensen, B.N.: Fault detection and diagnosis for smart buildings: state of the art, trends and challenges. In: 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC), pp. 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDSC.2016.7460392 · DOI
  20. Li, J., Guo, Y., Wall, J., West, S.: Support vector machine based fault detection and diagnosis for HVAC systems. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. 18, 204 (2019)
  21. Najari, N., Berlemont, S., Lefebvre, G., Duffner, S., Garcia, C.: Robust variational autoencoders and normalizing flows for unsupervised network anomaly detection. In: Barolli, L., Hussain, F., Enokido, T. (eds.) AINA 2022. LNNS, vol. 450, pp. 281–292. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99587-4_24 · DOI
  22. Nishiguchi, Y., Yano, A., Ohtani, T., Matsukura, R., Kakuta, J.: IoT fault management platform with device virtualization. In: IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things, WF-IoT 2018 - Proceedings 2018-January, pp. 257–262 (2018) · DOI
  23. Norris, M., et al.: Iotrepair: systematically addressing device faults in commodity IoT. In: 2020 IEEE/ACM Fifth International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), pp. 142–148 (2020) · doi:10.1109/iotdi49375.2020.00021
  24. Norris, M., et al.: Iotrepair: flexible fault handling in diverse IoT deployments. ACM Trans. Internet Things 3(3) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3532194 · doi:10.1145/3532194
  25. Ozeer, U.I.Z.: Autonomic resilience of distributed IoT applications in the Fog. Theses, Université Grenoble Alpes (2019) · DOI
  26. Perez Abreu, D., Velasquez, K., Curado, M., Monteiro, E.: A comparative analysis of simulators for the cloud to fog continuum. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 101, 102029 (2020) · DOI
  27. Power, A.: A predictive fault-tolerance framework for IoT systems. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University (2020). https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1063 · doi:10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1063
  28. Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Van de Velde, W., Perram, J.W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031845 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Sanislav, T., Mois, G.: A dependability analysis model in the context of cyber-physical systems. In: 2017 18th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), pp. 146–150 (2017) · doi:10.1109/carpathiancc.2017.7970387
  30. Sanislav, T., Zeadally, S., Mois, G.D., Fouchal, H.: Reliability, failure detection and prevention in cyber-physical systems (CPSS) with agents. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 31(24), e4481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4481 · DOI
  31. Sharma, A.B., Golubchik, L., Govindan, R.: Sensor faults: detection methods and prevalence in real-world datasets. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 6(3) (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  32. Silva, L.D., Meneguzzi, F., Logan, B.: BDI agent architectures: a survey. In: Bessiere, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2020, pp. 4914–4921. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2020) · DOI
  33. Sinche, S., et al.: A survey of IoT management protocols and frameworks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 22(2), 1168–1190 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
  34. Steenwinckel, B., et al.: Towards adaptive anomaly detection and root cause analysis by automated extraction of knowledge from risk analyses. In: SSN@ISWC (2018) · DOI
  35. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M.: The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering. In: Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 9–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Wilhelm, Y., Reimann, P., Gauchel, W., Mitschang, B.: Overview on hybrid approaches to fault detection and diagnosis: combining data-driven, physics-based and knowledge-based models. Procedia CIRP 99, 278–283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.041. 14th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, 15–17 July 2020 · DOI
  37. Xing, L.: Cascading failures in internet of things: review and perspectives on reliability and resilience. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(1), 44–64 (2021) · DOI · Paper page
  38. Xu, F., Liu, X., Chen, W., Zhou, C., Cao, B.: Ontology-based method for fault diagnosis of loaders. Sensors 18(3) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030729 · doi:10.3390/s18030729
  39. Zhang, H., Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Guo, H.: Fault detection and repairing for intelligent connected vehicles based on dynamic Bayesian network model. IEEE Internet Things J. 5(4), 2431–2440 (2018) · DOI

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Guittoum, A., Aïssaoui, F., Bolle, S., Boyer, F., & De Palma, N.
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2023
Pages
325-344
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_18
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solving the IoT Cascading Failure Dilemma Using a Semantic Multi-agent System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_18
The paper
Guittoum, A., Aïssaoui, F., Bolle, S., Boyer, F., & De Palma, N. (2023). Solving the IoT Cascading Failure Dilemma Using a Semantic Multi-agent System. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_18

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.