The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cascading Failures in Internet of Things: Review and Perspectives on Reliability and Resilience
Abstract
In the Internet of Things (IoT), various devices operate collaboratively in collecting data, relaying information to one another, and processing information intelligently. Due to interactions and dependencies between the IoT devices, the malfunction of one device may trigger a cascade of unexpected and often undesired state changes of other devices, introducing or accelerating catastrophic cascading failures. Understanding the causes of cascading failures and modeling their behavior and effects is crucial for guaranteeing the reliability of IoT systems and delivering the desired quality of service. This article systematically reviews cascading failures modeling and reliability analysis methodologies, as well as mitigation strategies for building the resilience of IoT systems against cascading failures. The review covers diverse IoT applications, from smart grids to smart homes, from sensor networks to IoT cloud computing, and from transportation networks to interdependent infrastructure networks. Opportunities and open research issues are also discussed in relation to restrictions of the current cascading failure models and methods, and potential new technologies and complexity of the constantly evolving IoT systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
Barabási, A.-L., & Bonabeau, E. (2003) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60 · Cited by 2,494
IoT-Based Big Data Storage Systems in Cloud Computing: Perspectives and Challenges
Cai, H., Xu, B., Jiang, L., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2619369 · Cited by 588
On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems
Arghandeh, R., von Meier, A., Mehrmanesh, L., & Mili, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.193 · Cited by 404
Roege, P. E., Collier, Z. A., Mancillas, J., McDonagh, J. A., & Linkov, I. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.012 · Cited by 314
Metrics and quantitative framework for assessing microgrid resilience against windstorms
Amirioun, M. H., Aminifar, F., Lesani, H., & Shahidehpour, M. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.07.025 · Cited by 208
Future developments in cyber risk assessment for the internet of things
Radanliev, P., De Roure, D. C., Nicolescu, R., Huth, M., Montalvo, R. M., Cannady, S., & Burnap, P. (2018) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.002 · Cited by 162
Preventing Cascading Failure Through Fuzzy Co-Operative Control Mechanism Using V2G
Adnan, M., Ali, M., Basalamah, A., & Tariq, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2944848 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Analysis on Cascading Reliability of Edge-Assisted Internet of Things
Fu, X., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Postolache, O. (2022) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108463 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Xing, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-64
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3080151652
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cascading Failures in Internet of Things: Review and Perspectives on Reliability and Resilience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2020.3018687
- The paper
- Xing, L. (2021). Cascading Failures in Internet of Things: Review and Perspectives on Reliability and Resilience. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.3018687
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
