Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Survey of IoT Management Protocols and Frameworks

Sinche, Soraya, Raposo, Duarte, Armando, Ngombo, Rodrigues, Andre, Boavida, Fernando, Pereira, Vasco, Silva, Jorge Sa·2020·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
DOI 10.1109/comst.2019.2943087
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As the complexity of Internet of Things (IoT) systems increases, a large variety of tools and technologies for IoT management are making their way into both research setups and the market. IoT management solutions must consider the resource restrictions of embedded devices, as well as their heterogeneity and network dynamics. With these in mind, the Internet Engineering Task Force developed several standards targeting the integration and interoperation of heterogeneous devices, such as the Representational State Transfer Configuration Protocol (RESTCONF) or the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Management Interface. Concurrently, the Open Mobile Alliance developed the Lightweight Machine-to-Machine protocol, for IoT device management. This paper provides a comprehensive, up-to-date overview of IoT management technologies, frameworks and protocols. Also, it proposes a taxonomy for IoT devices management. In addition to presenting the various solutions, the paper provides comparative views, standardization timeline, and market analysis. The presented analysis ranges from traditional network management protocols, such as Simple Network Management Protocol, to the newest IoT management and configuration protocols, such as CoAP Management Interface and Lightweight Machine-to-Machine protocols. Moreover, this survey identifies remaining challenges and solutions offered by recent management protocols, not covered by previous surveys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2019.2943087

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 129

  1. 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.07.007 · DOI
  2. 10.3390/s18082578 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jisa.2017.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/FIOT.2018.8325598 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2019, SmartThings Classic Developer Documentation Release Latest, 1110
  6. 2016, Watson IoT Platform
  7. 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2728000 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2728000
  8. 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  9. dorsemaine, 2016, Internet of Things: A definition and taxonomy, Proc 2nd Int Conf Next Generat Mobile Appl Services Technol (NGMAST), 72
  10. 10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301661 · doi:10.1109/etfa.2015.7301661
  11. 2017, AWS IOT Developer Guide
  12. 2019, FIWARE
  13. 2018, Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture, 1
  14. 2016, OMA Device Management Protocol Version 2 0
  15. 10.17487/rfc4741 · DOI · Paper page
  16. klas, 2014, Lightweight M2M Enabling Device Management and Applications for the Internet of Things, 1
  17. van der stok, 2017, CoAp Management Interfaces
  18. 10.17487/RFC8040 · doi:10.17487/rfc8040
  19. 10.17487/RFC8428 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-981-10-5861-5_4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.17487/rfc6690 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1007/978-3-319-27072-2_5 · DOI
  23. machwe, 2018, D2 1 5G and Vertical Services use cases and requirements, 88
  24. 10.1109/JIOT.2015.2419740 · DOI
  25. 10.17487/RFC7547 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.477 · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.477
  27. 2009, Introduction to the LonWorks® Platform Revision 2
  28. 10.1109/ISPLC.2015.7147615 · doi:10.1109/isplc.2015.7147615
  29. forouzan, 2007, Data Communications and Networking
  30. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808324 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7786995 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2017, Sigfox Technical Overview
  33. sornin, 2015, LoRaWAN TM Specification, 82
  34. 2017, IoT trend watch 2018
  35. 2016, Overview of the Internet of Things Y 4000/Y 2060 (06/2012), 53
  36. 2017, Series Y Global information infrastructure Internet protocol aspects next-generation networks Internet of Things and smart cities, 22
  37. rozsa, 2016, An application domain-based taxonomy for IoT sensors, Proc 23rd ISPE Int Conf Transdiscipl Eng Crossing Boundaries, 249
  38. 10.1049/iet-wss.2018.5033 · DOI
  39. jincy, 2015, Classification mechanism for IoT devices towards creating a security framework, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 321, 265, 10.1007/978-3-319-11227-5_23 · DOI
  40. mahmud, 2016, Fog computing: A taxonomy, survey and future directions, The Internet of Everything, 103
  41. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.08.014 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/MWC.2016.7721736 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2866491 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2019, Solutions IMPACT IoT Platform
  45. 2017, Nokia Connected Device Platform (CDP) Launch Your IoT Offering With Pay-as-You-Go Device Management
  46. 2017, Intel® Quark TM SoC X1000, 1
  47. by, 2014, CoAP Simple Management Protocol Software Functional Specification
  48. telefonica i+d, 2019, FIWARE OpenSpecification IoT Backend DeviceManagement R5
  49. 2016, OMA Device Management Architecture V 2, 1
  50. 2017, LwM2M 1 0 to Azure IoT Hub Bridge Sample
  51. 2018, Functional_Architecture, 507
  52. 2017, Overview of Device Management With IoT Hub
  53. 2016, Common requirements and capabilities of device management in the Internet of Things, 13
  54. 1998, Information Technology—Open Systems Interconnection—Common Management Information Service
  55. raj, 2017, The Internet of Things Enabling Technologies Platforms and Use Cases
  56. 10.17487/rfc1189 · doi:10.17487/rfc1189
  57. 2018, OCF Core Specification v2 0 3
  58. 10.1109/WAINA.2017.86 · DOI
  59. 2017, Guest Post Building IoT Applications With MQTT and Google Cloud Pub/Sub
  60. 2017, Overview of Internet of Things
  61. 2017, Watson
  62. mellon, 2006, CMMI® Division Version, 1
  63. 2016, AWS IoT
  64. case, 1990, A Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), 1
  65. 2017, ARTIK Manage Devices Using LWM2M
  66. 2017, Smart Devices Need Smart(er) Management
  67. 2017, Coiote
  68. 2019, IoT Agent
  69. 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2435000 · DOI · Paper page
  70. tischer, 2016, Programming and Automating Cisco Networks A Guide to Network Programmability and Automation in the Data Center Campus and WAN
  71. 1997, Information Technology—Open Systems Interconnection—Systems Management Overview
  72. 10.1109/35.212418 · doi:10.1109/35.212418
  73. subramanian, 2011, Network Management Principles and Practice
  74. 2000, TMN Management Functions
  75. 10.1109/ICMIT.2008.4654552 · doi:10.1109/icmit.2008.4654552
  76. 10.1109/IEEESTD.2002.93621 · doi:10.1109/ieeestd.2002.93621
  77. 2000, Principles for a telecommunications management network, 3, 39
  78. 10.17487/rfc7228 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 2019, Leshan
  80. 2018, Technical Specification “Management Enablement (OMA)”, 91
  81. 2019, Wakaama
  82. veillette, 2018, CoAp Management Interfaces, 1
  83. 2019, LwM2M-node-lib
  84. 10.17487/rfc7049 · DOI
  85. 10.1109/CSCN.2016.7785166 · doi:10.1109/cscn.2016.7785166
  86. silverajan, 2017, Enhancing lightweight M2M operations for managing IoT gateways, Proc IEEE Int Conf Internet Things IEEE Green Comput Commun IEEE Cyber Phys Soc Comput IEEE Smart Data iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-Smart Data, 187
  87. veillette, 2019, CoAp Management Interfaces, 1
  88. putera, 2016, Incorporating OMA lightweight M2M protocol in IoT/M2M standard architecture, Proc IEEE World Forum Internet Things (WF-IoT), 559
  89. lawitzke, 2018, NETCONF Intergration of Legacy SNMP Operational Data
  90. rao, 2016, Implementing LWM2M in constrained IoT devices, Proc IEEE Conf Wireless Sensor (ICWISE), 52
  91. 2017, Lightweight Machine to Machine Architecture Version 1 0
  92. 2019, OMA LightweightM2M (LwM2M) Object and Resource Registry
  93. banks, 2017, MQTT Version 5 0
  94. 2019, Anjay LwM2M Library
  95. 2017, Lightweight Machine to Machine (Tech Spec) Architecture V1 0
  96. bray, 2014, The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data-interchange Format
  97. 2016, Device Management Requirements, 1
  98. 2018, Lightweight Machine to Machine Core V1 1
  99. lamaazi, 2013, Internet of Things and networks’ management? LNMP, SNMP, COMAN protocols, Proc 1st Int Workshop Wireless Netw Mobile Commun (WINCOM), 1
  100. 10.1109/IMIS.2014.43 · DOI
  101. 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6384464 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 2019, Contiki the Open Source Os for the Internet of Things
  103. kuryla, 0, Evaluation of the resource requirements of SNMP agents on constrained devices, 100
  104. 10.1109/ETS.2016.7519331 · DOI
  105. larmo, 2019, Impact of CoAP and MQTT on NB-IoT system performance, SENSORS, 19, 9
  106. 10.1109/SECONW.2015.7328145 · DOI
  107. 10.17487/rfc2574 · doi:10.17487/rfc2574
  108. 10.1109/MoWNet.2016.7496622 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1109/ICSENS.2018.8589886 · doi:10.1109/icsens.2018.8589886
  110. presuhn, 2002, Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Manag Protocol (SNMP)
  111. ren, 2010, Chapter 12: Network management, Handbook of Technology Management, 37
  112. 10.17487/rfc3415 · doi:10.17487/rfc3415
  113. 10.1109/ISSNIP.2014.6827678 · DOI · Paper page
  114. mukhtar, 2008, LNMP—Management architecture for IPv6 based low-power wireless personal area networks (6LoWPAN), Proc IEEE/IFIP Netw Oper Manag Symp Pervasive Manag Ubiquitous Networks Surveys (NOMS), 417
  115. 10.17487/rfc3414 · doi:10.17487/rfc3414
  116. 10.1109/WIAD.2018.8588443 · doi:10.1109/wiad.2018.8588443
  117. lea, 2018, Internet of Things for Architects Architecting IoT Solutions by Implementing Sensors Communication Infrastructure Edge Computing Analytics and Security
  118. gündo?ran, 2018, NDN, CoAP, and MQTT, Proc ICN, 159
  119. case, 1993, Introduction to version 2 of the Internet-standard network management framework, 1
  120. 10.1109/WIAD.2018.8588445 · DOI
  121. 2017, Introduction to Standard Device Interfaces
  122. 10.1109/ICNS.2010.41 · DOI
  123. 2016, Jasper Technologies
  124. 2015, Cisco IoT System Deploy Accelerate Innovate, 50
  125. 2012, Cisco Connected Grid Device Manager Installation and User Guide Release 1 0 1
  126. 10.1109/HPCC.2009.49 · DOI
  127. tsou, 2011, Protocol profiles for constrained devices, Proc of the Interc Smart Objects with the Internet Workshop, 4
  128. 10.17487/rfc6241 · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560601 · DOI

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Sinche, S., Raposo, D., Armando, N., Rodrigues, A., Boavida, F., Pereira, V., & Silva, J. S.
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2020
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
1168-1190
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
DOI
10.1109/comst.2019.2943087
OpenAlex
W2975894920
Cited by
158
References
4
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of IoT Management Protocols and Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2019.2943087
The paper
Sinche, S., Raposo, D., Armando, N., Rodrigues, A., Boavida, F., Pereira, V., & Silva, J. S. (2020). A Survey of IoT Management Protocols and Frameworks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2943087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.