Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian Fusion Inspired 3D Reconstruction via LiDAR-Stereo Camera Pair

Kim, Ickbum, Singh, Sandeep·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-47966-3_23

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rasmussen, C.E., Williams, C.K., et al.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, vol. 1. Springer, Cham (2006)

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Kim, I., & Singh, S.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Ickbum
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2023
Pages
299-310
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4389272164
Cited by
2
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
3D reconstruction, Gaussian process regression, depth map fusion, point cloud sparsity, low-cost LiDAR, Bayesian inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Fusion Inspired 3D Reconstruction via LiDAR-Stereo Camera Pair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-47966-3_23
The paper
Kim, I., & Singh, S. (2023). Bayesian Fusion Inspired 3D Reconstruction via LiDAR-Stereo Camera Pair. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47966-3_23

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.