The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AI-Driven Inclusion: Exploring Automatic Text Simplification and Complexity Evaluation for Enhanced Educational Accessibility
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Murtaza et al. demonstrated that AI systems can produce simplified, domain-appropriate explanations of complex learning materials.
“In the context of educational technology, Murtaza et al. [24] demonstrated that AI systems can produce simplified, domain-appropriate explanations of complex learning materials, helping to make content more accessible to learners.”
From Accessible IoT Dashboard Design with AI-Enhanced Descriptions for Visually Impaired Users (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Optimizing Statistical Machine Translation for Text Simplification
Xu, W. H., Napoles, C., Pavlick, E., Chen, Q. Z., & Callison-Burch, C. (2016) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00107 · Cited by 524
Strategy Use by Good and Poor Comprehenders Reading Expository Text of Differing Levels
Kletzien, S. B. (1991) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747732 · Cited by 133
High noon: twenty global problems, twenty years to solve them
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1506 · Cited by 109
Learning to Read and Write in One Elementary School
Juel, C. L. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4282-6 · Cited by 92
Multiattentive Recurrent Neural Network Architecture for Multilingual Readability Assessment
Azpiazu, I. M., & Pera, M. S. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00278 · Cited by 59
Learning to Prompt in the Classroom to Understand AI Limits: A Pilot Study
Theophilou, E., Koyutürk, C., Yavari, M., Bursic, S., Donabauer, G., Telari, A., Testa, A., Boiano, R., Hernandez-Leo, D., Ruskov, M., et al. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_33 · Cited by 58
Self-citationSupporting the adaptation of texts for poor literacy readers
Cândido, A., Maziero, E. G., Gasperin, C., et al. (2009) · doi:10.3115/1609843.1609848 · Cited by 56
Rets, I., & Rogaten, J. (2020) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12517 · Cited by 31
Deep Neural Attention-Based Model for the Evaluation of Italian Sentences Complexity
Schicchi, D., Pilato, G., & Bosco, G. L. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2020.00053 · Cited by 22
Self-citationEstimating CEFR reading comprehension text complexity
Natova, I. (2019) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2019.1665088 · Cited by 15
Machine Learning Models for Measuring Syntax Complexity of English Text
Schicchi, D., Bosco, G. L., & Pilato, G. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_59 · Cited by 13
Self-citationDaCENA: Serendipitous News Reading with Data Contexts
Palmonari, M., Uboldi, G., Cremaschi, M., et al. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25639-9_26 · Cited by 11
Facilitating Access to Health Web Pages with Different Language Complexity Levels
Alfano, M., Lenzitti, B., Taibi, D., & Helfert, M. (2019) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE) · doi:10.5220/0007740301130123 · Cited by 10
Self-citationAn Analysis of Teacher Judgments of Reading Level
Jorgenson, G. W. (1975) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312012001067 · Cited by 8
Metric-Based In-context Learning: A Case Study in Text Simplification
Vadlamannati, S., & Şahin, G. G. (2023) · International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.inlg-main.18 · Cited by 8
Neuro-Fuzzy Systems for Learning Analytics
Casalino, G., Castellano, G., & Zaza, G. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96308-8_124 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Chall, J.S., Conard, S.S., Harris-Sharples, S.: S.: Should textbooks challenge students? The case for easier or harder textbooks. Teachers College Press (1991)
- Dale, E., Chall, J.S.: The concept of readability. Elem. Engl. 26(1), 19–26 (1949). http://www.jstor.org/stable/41383594
- De Belder, J., Moens, M.F.: Text simplification for children. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR Workshop on Accessible Search Systems, pp. 19–26. ACM, New York (2010)
- Dell’Orletta, F., Montemagni, S., Venturi, G.: Read-it: assessing readability of Italian texts with a view to text simplification. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies, pp. 73–83. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)
- Fry, E.B.: Elementary Reading Instruction. McGraw-Hill, New York (1977)
- Leary, B.E.: Difficulties in reading material. In: Gray, W.S. (ed.) Reading in General Education, pp. 301–2. American Council on Education, Washington, D.C. (1940)
- Martin, L., Fan, A., de la Clergerie, É., Bordes, A., Sagot, B.: Muss: multilingual unsupervised sentence simplification by mining paraphrases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00352 (2021) · arXiv
- Martin, L., Sagot, B., de la Clergerie, E., Bordes, A.: Controllable sentence simplification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02677 (2019) · arXiv
- Omelianchuk, K., Raheja, V., Skurzhanskyi, O.: Text simplification by tagging. ArXiv abs/2103.05070 (2021) · arXiv
- Schicchi, D., Upadhyaya, A., Fisichella, M., Taibi, D.: Using chatgpt to enhance students’ behavior in social media via the moral foundation theory. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on High-performance Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 22nd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2023). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3605 (2023)
- Tinker, M.A.: Relative importance of factors of interest in reading materials for junior high school pupils, dale zeller (book review). J. Educ. Res. 35, 716–717 (1941)
- Xia, M., Kochmar, E., Briscoe, T.: Text readability assessment for second language learners. CoRR abs/1906.07580 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.07580 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A closer look at ChatGPT's role in concept map generation for education
Schicchi, D., Limongelli, C., Monteleone, V., & Taibi, D. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2497110 · Cited by 11
Self-citationAccessible IoT Dashboard Design with AI-Enhanced Descriptions for Visually Impaired Users
Stelea, G. A., Sangeorzan, L., & Enache-David, N. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17070274 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Schicchi, D., & Taibi, D.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Schicchi, Daniele
- Venue
- Communications in Computer and Information Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 359-371
- ISSN
- 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-0937
- OpenAlex
- W4402632514
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Text Readability and Simplification
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- text simplification, inclusive education, access to education, reading proficiency, linguistic complexity, personalized learning, special educational needs, university students, artificial intelligence in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review