Accessible IoT Dashboard Design with AI-Enhanced Descriptions for Visually Impaired Users
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to an abundance of data streams and real-time dashboards in domains such as smart cities, healthcare, manufacturing, and agriculture. However, many current IoT dashboards emphasize complex visualizations with minimal textual cues, posing significant barriers to users with visual impairments who rely on screen readers or other assistive technologies. This paper presents AccessiDashboard, a web-based IoT dashboard platform that prioritizes accessible design from the ground up. The system uses semantic HTML5 and WAI-ARIA compliance to ensure that screen readers can accurately interpret and navigate the interface. In addition to standard chart presentations, AccessiDashboard automatically generates long descriptions of graphs and visual elements, offering a text-first alternative interface for non-visual data exploration. The platform supports multi-modal data consumption (visual charts, bullet lists, tables, and narrative descriptions) and leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce context-aware textual representations of sensor data. A privacy-by-design approach is adopted for the AI integration to address ethical and regulatory concerns. Early evaluation suggests that AccessiDashboard reduces cognitive and navigational load for users with vision disabilities, demonstrating its potential as a blueprint for future inclusive IoT monitoring solutions.
Verified 2026-10-06 · 2 references not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
AccessiDashboard is a web-based IoT dashboard designed accessibility-first with semantic HTML5, WAI-ARIA, multi-modal data views, and LLM-generated long descriptions for visually impaired users. A preliminary audit indicates the prototype satisfies WCAG 2.1 AA, but the paper reports no completed user study with blind or low-vision participants.
Key findings
- The prototype uses semantic HTML5, ARIA roles, keyboard navigation, and synchronized visual/textual modes; a preliminary audit combining expert screen-reader walkthroughs with Lighthouse and WAVE confirmed it satisfies WCAG 2.1 AA criteria.
- AccessiDashboard generates AI long descriptions via the OpenAI API, with prompts including recent readings, min/max/average, and context; descriptions are stored in a `LongDescription` model and can be human-reviewed.
- The paper’s comparison table claims AccessiDashboard provides real-time accessible IoT updates, AI-enhanced descriptions, rich multimodal output, and human-in-the-loop validation, whereas Azimuth uses rule-based non-LLM text and Grafana lacks AI-generated descriptions and has only partial WCAG 2.1 AA conformance as of 2023.
- Background statistics cited include WHO’s estimate that more than 2.2 billion people globally experience near- or distance-vision impairment, WebAIM 2024 finding that 68% of blind respondents interact with dashboards at least weekly, and an audit of 87 public COVID-19 dashboards where fewer than 20% provided basic text alternatives.
Methods
- Design and implementation study: a functional Laravel/PHP MVC prototype with RESTful IoT data ingestion, semantic HTML5/WAI-ARIA front end, OpenAI API integration for long descriptions, Redis caching, and privacy-by-design controls.
- Multi-modal interface modes: visual chart mode, bullet trend list, data grid table, and detailed AI-generated analysis, all synchronized from the same sensor data.
- Evaluation: preliminary accessibility audit using expert screen-reader walkthroughs plus automated Lighthouse and WAVE tools; qualitative comparison against Azimuth and Grafana. Planned future user study metrics include task success rate, completion time, error rate, and comprehension score, with preliminary thresholds of at least 90% task completion and no more than 15% critical errors.
Limitations
- The paper states the initial testing relied on a small sample of accessibility experts and focused predominantly on English-language screen reader environments; broader linguistic and cultural accessibility remains unexplored.
- The paper states automated tools cannot assess contextual comprehension, navigational intuitiveness, or cognitive load, so the demonstrator is a strong technical foundation rather than a complete solution; formal load testing and performance benchmarks are planned but not reported.
- Evident from the text: no completed empirical user study with blind or low-vision participants is reported, and the AI layer may introduce bias, overgeneralizations, or contextual inaccuracies, which the paper acknowledges and mitigates with disclaimers, bounded prompts, human review, and fallback mechanisms.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
AccessiDashboard meets or exceeds WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility criteria, as verified by manual testing and automated tools.
“To validate our approach, we conducted an initial evaluation through manual testing and the use of automated tools to verify that the dashboard meets or exceeds WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility criteria [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19]
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Early evaluation suggests that AccessiDashboard reduces cognitive and navigational load for users with vision disabilities.
“Early evaluation suggests that AccessiDashboard reduces cognitive and navigational load for users with vision disabilities, demonstrating its potential as a blueprint for future inclusive IoT monitoring solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
AccessiDashboard includes built-in safeguards: all AI-generated interpretations are accompanied by explicit disclaimers.
“First, all AI-generated interpretations are accompanied by explicit disclaimers that inform users of the automated nature of the content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Early evaluations suggest that the approach is effective in making complex data more understandable to blind users.
“Early evaluations suggest that the approach is effective in making complex data more understandable to blind users, although further user testing is required to quantify the benefits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
AccessiDashboard includes a human-in-the-loop validation mechanism enabling administrators to review and refine AI-generated outputs.
“Crucially, a human-in-the-loop validation mechanism enables administrators to review and refine AI-generated outputs, ensuring both reliability and editorial oversight.”
- Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions and Future Work · plain
“AccessiDashboard includes a human oversight mechanism for its AI-generated content. Administrators can review the long descriptions produced by the AI and adjust or approve them before they reach end-users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions and Future Work · plain
- Findingreasoning
AccessiDashboard integrates accessibility as a core design principle rather than a supplemental feature.
“Accessi-Dashboard integrates accessibility as a core design principle rather than a supplemental feature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
AccessiDashboard employs prompt-engineering strategies to limit the scope of AI outputs to bounded, factual sensor data without speculative forecasting or diagnostic assertions.
“AccessiDashboard employs prompt-engineering strategies to limit the scope of AI outputs.Descriptions are generated based strictly on bounded, factual sensor data-such as temperature, humidity, AQI, or energy use-without speculative forecasting or diagnostic assertions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
AccessiDashboard dynamically connects each live sensor feed to an LLM, producing WCAG-compliant, context-aware textual narratives that evolve with the data in real time.
“It dynamically connects each live sensor feed to a Large Language Model (LLM), producing WCAG-compliant, context-aware textual narratives that evolve with the data in real time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
AccessiDashboard implements fallback mechanisms to suppress uncertain outputs or revert to structured templates.
“Furthermore, fallback mechanisms are implemented to either suppress uncertain outputs or revert to structured templates when necessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We demonstrated that, through semantic HTML5, WAI-ARIA annotations, and multiple modes of data representation, an IoT dashboard can be made perceivable and navigable to screen reader users without compromising functionality for others.
“We demonstrated that, through semantic HTML5, WAI-ARIA annotations, and multiple modes of data representation, an IoT dashboard can be made perceivable and navigable to screen reader users without compromising functionality for others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The integration of an LLM proved central to reducing cognitive load.
“The integration of a large language model proved central to reducing cognitive load [56].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LLMs can automatically annotate images or textualize data patterns with remarkable depth.
“For instance, recent studies have shown that LLMs can automatically annotate images or textualize data patterns with remarkable depth [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LLMs can generate context-aware, extended textual descriptions or summaries of data that go beyond what a human might write manually for an alt text.
“LLMs can generate context-aware, extended textual descriptions or summaries of data that go beyond what a human might write manually for an alt text [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A recent audit of 87 public COVID-19 dashboards found that fewer than 20% provided basic text alternatives such as alt-text or downloadable tables.
“Yet, a recent audit of 87 public COVID-19 dashboards revealed that fewer than 20% provided even basic text alternatives such as alt-text or downloadable tables [5], highlighting a persistent accessibility gap in data-rich IoT interfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In user studies, Azimuth's generated dashboards enabled blind users to navigate and analyze data more effectively than standard dashboards.
“In user studies, their generated dashboards-which included structured headings, concise summaries, and interactive filtering through text-enabled blind users to navigate and analyze data more effectively than standard dashboards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Srinivasan et al. developed Azimuth, a system that automatically generates screen-reader-friendly dashboards from existing visual dashboard specifications.
“For example, Srinivasan et al. [22] developed Azimuth, a system that automatically generates screen-reader-friendly dashboards from existing visual dashboard specifications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The dynamic aspect of continuously updating sensor data introduces significant challenges for AI systems: descriptions must be updated or regenerated as new data arrives while maintaining coherence over time.
“This dynamic aspect introduces significant challenges for AI systems: descriptions must be updated or regenerated as new data arrives while maintaining coherence over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Prior studies have noted that even when alt text or simple data tables are provided for data visualizations, they often lack the depth needed for thorough understanding.
“Prior studies on the accessibility of data visualizations during events like the COVID-19 pandemic have noted that, even when alt text or simple data tables are provided, they often lack the depth needed for thorough understanding [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most AI captioning and description systems are primarily designed to work with static images or pre-defined datasets, not with continuously updating sensor data.
“Most AI captioning and description systems are primarily designed to work with static images or pre-defined datasets, not with continuously updating sensor data that may change every few seconds [28].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Simply providing a short text alternative (alt text) for an image or chart is often insufficient to convey the complex, dynamic information in real-time data streams.
“Simply providing a short text alternative (alt text) for an image or chart is often insufficient to convey the complex, dynamic information in real-time data streams.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ethical and privacy implications of using AI in accessible IoT interfaces are seldom addressed.
“Moreover, the ethical and privacy implications of using AI in such interfaces are seldom addressed, as most works focus on the technical feasibility of generating descriptions but not on issues like user consent, data protection, or potential biases in AI-generated content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
AccessiDashboard uses semantic HTML5 and WAI-ARIA compliance to ensure that screen readers can accurately interpret and navigate the interface.
“The system uses semantic HTML5 and WAI-ARIA compliance to ensure that screen readers can accurately interpret and navigate the interface.”
- Also stated in: § • · plain
“AccessiDashboard uses semantic HTML5 markup and WAI-ARIA (Web Accessibility Initiative-Accessible Rich Internet Appli-cations) [13] attributes to ensure that screen readers can interpret the page structure and content intuitively.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2.1. Semantic HTML5 and WAI-ARIA Front-End · plain
“The AccessiDashboard front-end is developed with semantic HTML5 markup to maximize native accessibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § • · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
By designing these modes within one system, adding a new sensor or data source automatically makes that data available in all formats.
“By designing these modes within one system, we also ensure that adding a new sensor or data source automatically makes that data available in all formats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
When the system sends data to the LLM service to generate a description, no personally identifiable information (PII) is included in the prompt.
“When the system sends data to the LLM service to generate a description, we ensure that no personally identifiable information (PII) [46] is included in the prompt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Grafana is partially conformant with WCAG 2.1 Level AA as of 2023.
“Grafana is partially conformant with WCAG 2.1 Level AA as of 2023 [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The project demonstrates that an IoT dashboard can be both sophisticated and accessible.
“Overall, the project demonstrates that an IoT dashboard can be both sophisticated and accessible, turning inclusive practice into a catalyst for better, more universally usable data experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
LLMs can indeed enhance user interfaces when guided appropriately.
“For practitioners and researchers, this work underscores the feasibility of combining AI and accessibility: LLMs can indeed enhance user interfaces when guided appropriately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This multimodal design means sighted users and visually impaired users have parallel access to the information.
“This multimodal design means sighted users and visually impaired users have parallel access to the information-charts for those who can see them, and text/tables/narratives for those using screen readers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
All communications are over SSL/TLS to prevent eavesdropping on the data streams.
“All communications are over SSL/TLS [45] to prevent eavesdropping on the data streams.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
By closely aligning with real sensor data, the system reduces the likelihood of generating inaccurate or misleading information.
“By closely aligning with real sensor data, the system reduces the likelihood of generating inaccurate or misleading information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 58
- May combine two claims. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStateless Laravel services, Redis queues, and effective caching ensure that real-time scale-out is feasible.
“Stateless Laravel services, Redis queues, and effective caching ensure that real-time scale-out is feasible, while privacy-by-design safeguards and audit logs maintain transparency and compliance in AI usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPrivacy-by-design safeguards and audit logs maintain transparency and compliance in AI usage.
“Stateless Laravel services, Redis queues, and effective caching ensure that real-time scale-out is feasible, while privacy-by-design safeguards and audit logs maintain transparency and compliance in AI usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe system offers concise stories of what the data are doing, turning numeric trends into immediately understandable insights.
“Instead of forcing users to infer patterns from raw tables, the system now offers concise stories of what the data are doing, thereby turning numeric trends into immediately understandable insights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAccessiDashboard presents data through multiple synchronized modalities: visual charts/graphs, structured data tables, bullet-list summaries, and AI-generated narrative descriptions.
“AccessiDashboard presents data through multiple synchronized modalities.Alongside the usual visual charts/graphs, it provides text-first alternatives: structured data tables, bullet-list summaries of sensor readings, and narrative descriptions generated by AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationAll communication in AccessiDashboard is over HTTPS to secure data in transit.
“All communication is over HTTPS [39] to secure data in transit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe Detailed Analysis Mode provides a narrative, paragraph-based summary where the AI generates long-form textual descriptions of data trends and contextual insights.
“This mode provides a narrative, paragraph-based summary where the AI generates long-form textual descriptions of data trends and contextual insights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationProviding both graphical and textual forms of data has been shown to cater to different user preferences and needs, enhancing accessibility and usability.
“In the web and data visualization contexts, providing both graphical and textual forms of data, as well as enabling natural language querying of visualizations, has been shown to cater to different user preferences and needs, enhancing accessibility and usability [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe Data Grid Table Mode structured layout enables users to navigate cell by cell and compare values across time or across sensors.
“This structured layout enables users to navigate cell by cell and compare values across time or across sensors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFew existing solutions offer both a typical visual interface for sighted users and a thorough alternative textual interface that can keep pace with frequent data changes.
“Few existing solutions offer both a typical visual interface for sighted users and a thorough alternative textual interface that can keep pace with frequent data changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIf a new sensor value arrives, the visual chart updates, the bullet list updates, the table updates, and the narrative could be refreshed if needed.
“If a new sensor value arrives, the visual chart updates, the bullet list updates, the table updates, and even the narrative could be refreshed if needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningKeeping the human-in-the-loop option (admins can review outputs) ensures accuracy for mission-critical deployments.
“Additionally, by keeping the human-in-the-loop option (admins can review outputs), the system can ensure accuracy for mission-critical deployments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn cases where IoT data might be sensitive, AccessiDashboard ensures that personal identifiers are not included with sensor data, or provides anonymization if needed.
“In cases where IoT data might be sensitive (e.g., health data), we ensure that personal identifiers are not included with sensor data, or we provide anonymization if needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAccessiDashboard automatically generates long descriptions of graphs and visual elements using an LLM, providing a text-first alternative interface for non-visual data exploration.
“AccessiDashboard automatically generates long descriptions of graphs and visual elements, offering a text-first alternative interface for non-visual data exploration.”
- Also stated in: § • · plain
“Moving beyond simple alt text, the system leverages an LLM to produce extended textual descriptions of charts and complex graphics.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2.3. AI Integration for Generating Long Descriptions · plain
“A core innovation of AccessiDashboard is the automated generation of long descriptions for charts and complex data using an LLM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § • · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn Detailed Analysis Mode, instead of displaying raw values, the user receives a coherent and context-rich interpretation of the data similar to an automated report or commentary powered by a large language model.
“Instead of displaying raw values, the user receives a coherent and context-rich interpretation of the data-similar to an automated report or commentary powered by a large language model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationProviding multiple modes addresses different cognitive styles and situations.
“Providing multiple modes addresses different cognitive styles [40] and situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAccessiDashboard supports multi-modal data consumption (visual charts, bullet lists, tables, and narrative descriptions) and allows users to switch between modes.
“The platform supports multi-modal data consumption (visual charts, bullet lists, tables, and narrative descriptions) and leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce context-aware textual representations of sensor data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis is a key aspect of inclusive design: one platform that adapts to the user, rather than parallel platforms.
“This is a key aspect of inclusive design: one platform that adapts to the user, rather than parallel platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFully accessible IoT dashboards that integrate long-form AI-generated descriptions, real-time sensor updates, and strict compliance with accessibility standards (like WAI-ARIA) are still rare.
“While there have been notable steps toward accessible data visualization and AIassisted interfaces, we find that fully accessible IoT dashboards that integrate long-form AI-generated descriptions, real-time sensor updates, and strict compliance with accessibility standards (like WAI-ARIA) are still rare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most existing IoT dashboards are designed with primarily visual paradigms and minimal textual description.
- Rests on an assumption: Current IoT dashboard solutions often treat accessibility as an afterthought.
- Rests on an assumption: Many dashboards comply only with minimal requirements, offering generic alt text or basic high-contrast mode, while ignoring deeper issues of navigability and interpretability for screen reader users.
- Rests on an assumption: In practice, many IoT solutions ignore WCAG guideline or implement it in a minimal way.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy generating multi-sentence narratives, these long descriptions give visually impaired users a much richer understanding of the data.
“By generating multi-sentence narratives, these long descriptions give visually impaired users a much richer understanding of the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMurtaza et al. demonstrated that AI systems can produce simplified, domain-appropriate explanations of complex learning materials.
“In the context of educational technology, Murtaza et al. [24] demonstrated that AI systems can produce simplified, domain-appropriate explanations of complex learning materials, helping to make content more accessible to learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationWCAG 2.1 specifies that images and charts should have meaningful alternative text so that users of assistive technologies can perceive the content.
“The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 [21] specify that images and charts should have meaningful alternative text so that users of assistive technologies can perceive the content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenAll these modes are kept in sync with the underlying data.
“All these modes are kept in sync with the underlying data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenAccessiDashboard's user interface supports multiple modes of data representation to accommodate different user needs and preferences, all within the same platform.
“AccessiDashboard's user interface supports multiple modes of data representation to accommodate different user needs and preferences, all within the same platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach new data source is initially reviewed by a designated administrator who compares the system-generated narrative with the corresponding live data visualization.
“Each new data source is initially reviewed by a designated administrator, who compares the system-generated narrative with the corresponding live data visualization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Bullet Trend List Mode format is accessible for screen reader users and presents clearly separated data points in a linear sequence, enabling efficient comprehension.
“This format is accessible for screen reader users and presents clearly separated data points in a linear sequence, enabling efficient comprehension.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationScalability considerations, such as deploying the application in a load-balanced setup and using caching layers and optimizing database indices, have been incorporated to handle potentially high-frequency data streams.
“Scalability considerations, such as deploying the application in a load-balanced setup and using caching layers (Redis [36] for session or description caching) and optimizing database indices, have been incorporated to handle potentially high-frequency data streams.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThis integration enables near real-time, human-readable summaries of IoT data without manual authoring, supporting accessibility by transforming visual sensor trends into descriptive language.
“This integration enables near real-time, human-readable summaries of IoT data without manual authoring, supporting accessibility by transforming visual sensor trends into descriptive language.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe Data Grid Table Mode leverages semantic HTML table markup, ensuring relationships between headers and data remain accessible and clear to assistive technologies.
“It leverages semantic HTML table markup, ensuring relationships between headers and data remain accessible and clear to assistive technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDiscrepancies such as factual inaccuracies, omitted anomalies, or unit mismatches are documented and categorized.
“Discrepancies, such as factual inaccuracies, omitted anomalies, or unit mismatches, are documented and categorized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningData tables in AccessiDashboard are marked up with <table>, <thead>, <tbody>, and <th> elements, which ensures that screen reader software can read out row and column headers when a cell is focused.
“Data tables (when used to display numeric readings) are marked up with <table> along with <thead> and <tbody> to separate headers and data rows, and <th scope=”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA privacy-by-design approach is adopted for the AI integration, with user data handled in compliance with GDPR guidelines and controls to prevent sensitive information from being sent to external AI services.
“A privacy-by-design approach is adopted for the AI integration to address ethical and regulatory concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe AI is used as an assistant in AccessiDashboard.
“It is important to note that the AI is used as an assistant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMost prior solutions either require authors to manually write long descriptions or focus on static datasets rather than live IoT data streams.
“However, most prior solutions either require authors to manually write long descriptions or focus on static datasets rather than live IoT data streams.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMulti-modal design has been found beneficial not only for users with disabilities but also for users operating in constrained environments.
“Multi-modal design has been found beneficial not only for users with disabilities but also for users operating in constrained environments, such as technicians listening to a dashboard readout while repairing a machine or users who cannot look at a screen [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe Data Grid Table Mode is AI-generated and presents data in a tabular format similar to a spreadsheet.
“Also AI-generated, this mode presents data in a tabular format similar to a spreadsheet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAccessiDashboard is designed as a web-based platform that can be deployed on a typical server or cloud environment to monitor IoT sensor data in real-time.
“AccessiDashboard is designed as a web-based platform that can be deployed on a typical server or cloud environment to monitor IoT sensor data in real-time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe AccessiDashboard interface is responsive and tested to work with screen readers like NVDA and VoiceOver.
“The interface is responsive and tested to work with screen readers like NVDA [34] and VoiceOver [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe system mitigates risks of erroneous information by carefully crafting prompts and limiting the scope so the model focuses on the given data and does not introduce external facts unless relevant.
“We mitigate risks of erroneous information by carefully crafting prompts and limiting the scope: the model is asked to focus on the given data and not introduce external facts unless relevant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe modular nature of the description generation means the AI component could be improved or replaced without affecting the rest of the system.
“The modular nature of the description generation (encapsulated in one service) means the AI component could be improved or replaced without affecting the rest of the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningEach sensor widget in AccessiDashboard is identified with a heading and contained in a region with an ARIA label, enabling screen reader users to quickly navigate by regions.
“Each sensor”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe lightweight validation process provides an early assessment of practical reliability.
“This lightweight validation process provides an early assessment of practical reliability and will be replicated with independent reviewers during the full user study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe Bullet Trend List Mode is AI-generated and presents the latest sensor readings or summarized trends as bullet points.
“In this AI-generated textual mode, the latest sensor readings or summarized trends are presented as bullet points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationUser authentication and role-based access control are implemented via Laravel's built-in mechanisms.
“On the security side, user authentication and role-based access control [43] are implemented via Laravel's built-in mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIf factual accuracy remains within an acceptable threshold, the source is considered verified and subsequently monitored through periodic spot-checks.
“If factual accuracy remains within an acceptable threshold, the source is considered verified and subsequently monitored through periodic spot-checks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWe developed a functional prototype that realizes the design principles described above.
“To demonstrate the practical viability of AccessiDashboard, we developed a functional prototype that realizes the design principles described above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataKey accessibility features were validated: logically ordered headings, semantically meaningful landmarks, and full keyboard navigability.
“Key accessibility features were validated, including logically ordered headings, semantically meaningful landmarks, and full keyboard navigability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn compliance with regulations like GDPR, users have control over their data.
“In compliance with regulations like GDPR, users have control over their data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningBy addressing both technical and UX aspects, we move toward closing the accessibility gap in IoT applications.
“By addressing both the technical aspects (real-time data handling, AI integration) and the user experience aspects (clear structure, meaningful text alternatives), we move toward closing the accessibility gap in IoT applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe initial testing relied on a small sample of accessibility experts and focused predominantly on English-language screen reader environments.
“The initial testing relied on a small sample of accessibility experts and focused predominantly on English-language screen reader environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAccessiDashboard demonstrates that accessible IoT dashboards augmented with AI are not only possible but highly practical.
“In conclusion, AccessiDashboard demonstrates that accessible IoT dashboards augmented with AI are not only possible but highly practical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAccessiDashboard provides an audit log for AI usage.
“Moreover, AccessiDashboard provides an audit log for AI usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA preliminary audit of AccessiDashboard combined expert screen-reader walkthroughs with automated tools such as Lighthouse and WAVE, confirming that the current prototype satisfies WCAG 2.1 AA criteria.
“A preliminary audit of AccessiDashboard combined expert screen-reader walkthroughs with automated tools such as Lighthouse [55] and WAVE, confirming that the current prototype satisfies WCAG 2.1 AA criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenAny labels that could reveal identity or location are removed or generalized before being sent.
“Any labels that could reveal identity or location are removed or generalized before being sent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe AI-generated content, being derived from sensor data, is treated as part of the user's data stream and thus accorded the same protections.
“The AI-generated content, being derived from sensor data, is treated as part of the user's data stream and thus accorded the same protections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSensor data is stored for up to 30 days, and AI outputs for up to 90 days before anonymization.
“Storage Limitation and Security: Sensor data is stored for up to 30 days, and AI outputs for up to 90 days before anonymization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe user agreement or system documentation includes what kind of data might be sent to third-party AI services, to be transparent.
“We also include in the user agreement or system documentation what kind of data might be sent to third-party AI services, to be transparent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf an AI-generated description ever provided an incorrect or inappropriate statement, the maintainers can review the log and adjust the system (by refining the prompt or correcting the output manually, and in some cases reporting issues to the AI service if needed).
“If an AI-generated description ever provided an incorrect or inappropriate statement, the maintainers can review the log and adjust the system (either by refining the prompt or correcting the output manually, and in some cases reporting issues to the AI service if needed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll user interactions with the dashboard (beyond public data viewing, if any) require a login.
“All user interactions with the dashboard (beyond public data viewing, if any) require a login.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataOur comparative analysis indicates that AccessiDashboard could serve as a blueprint for inclusive dashboard design.
“Our comparative analysis indicates that AccessiDashboard could serve as a blueprint for inclusive dashboard design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSince most sensor data are numeric and generic, stripping out or abstracting labels that might contain names or specific locations is the main privacy measure.
“Since most sensor data are numeric and generic, this mainly involves stripping out or abstracting any labels that might contain names or specific locations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most sensor data are numeric and generic.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenBefore using sensor data, organizations agree to a data-processing policy based on legitimate interest.
“Lawfulness, Fairness, and Consent: Before using sensor data, organizations agree to a data-processing policy based on legitimate interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe result is a scalable and sustainable dashboarding solution that delivers timely, rich insights to blind or visually impaired users, fully aligned with the experience provided to sighted users.
“The result is a scalable and sustainable dashboarding solution that delivers timely, rich insights to blind or visually impaired users, fully aligned with the experience provided to sighted users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenUsers are clearly informed about what data is shared and why, supporting transparency.
“Users are clearly informed about what data is shared and why, supporting transparency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenOnly essential fields, like timestamp, sensor ID, and readings, are used for AI processing.
“Purpose Limitation and Data Minimization: Only essential fields, like timestamp, sensor ID, and readings, are used for AI processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAutomated accessibility tools were valuable in detecting structural issues such as contrast errors or ARIA misconfigurations, and helped guide iterative improvements.
“Automated accessibility tools were valuable in detecting structural issues such as contrast errors or ARIA misconfigurations, and they helped guide iterative improvements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIf personal metadata is included (e.g., names in alerts), explicit opt-in is required.
“If personal metadata is included (e.g., names in alerts), explicit opt-in is required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSessions are managed securely, and Laravel's CSRF protection is used for forms and state-changing requests to prevent cross-site request forgery.
“Sessions are managed securely, and we use Laravel's CSRF [44] protection for forms and state-changing requests to prevent cross-site request forgery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause descriptions are generated automatically, expanding the dashboard to dozens or hundreds of sensors no longer multiplies authoring effort, making accessibility a built-in property.
“Because descriptions are generated automatically, expanding the dashboard to dozens or hundreds of sensors no longer multiplies authoring effort, making accessibility a built-in property rather than an afterthought.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll communications are encrypted, and access is logged to ensure accountability.
“All communications are encrypted, and access is logged to ensure accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningEvery time a prompt is sent and a response received, it can be recorded (and shown to an admin if needed) to track what the AI was asked and what it replied.
“Every time a prompt is sent and a response received, it can be recorded (and shown to an admin if needed) to track what the AI was asked and what it replied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe system can switch between cloud-based and self-hosted AI models, allowing organizations to keep data processing within their jurisdiction.
“Model Flexibility and Data Sovereignty: The system can switch between cloud-based and self-hosted AI models, allowing organizations to keep data processing within their jurisdiction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIdentifiers are securely hashed, data is encrypted at rest, and AI-generated outputs are linked to anonymized keys for added protection.
“Anonymization and Pseudonymization: Identifiers are securely hashed, data is encrypted at rest, and AI-generated outputs are linked to anonymized keys for added protection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn a scenario where users might input personal data, the system would allow them to delete or export their data.
“In a scenario where users might input personal data (not the case for simple sensor dashboards, but if it extended to user-generated content), the system would allow them to delete or export their data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAccess to data is logged such that any unauthorized access attempts can be detected.
“We also log access to data such that any unauthorized access attempts can be detected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThese considerations ensure that an inclusive solution like Accessi-Dashboard can be adopted in practice within organizations that have strict IT and data governance policies.
“These considerations ensure that an inclusive solution like Accessi-Dashboard can be adopted in practice within organizations that have strict IT and data governance policies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe architecture combining automation with ethical safeguards streamlines inclusive design workflows and reduces the maintenance burden typically associated with accessibility.
“This architecture-combining automation with ethical safeguards-streamlines inclusive design workflows and reduces the maintenance burden typically associated with accessibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most existing IoT dashboards are designed with primarily visual paradigms and minimal textual description.
“However, most of these IoT dashboards are designed with primarily visual paradigms (color-coded charts, graphs, and interactive graphical controls) often with minimal textual description.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current IoT dashboard solutions often treat accessibility as an afterthought.
“Current IoT dashboard solutions often treat accessibility as an afterthought, if they address it at all.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many dashboards comply only with minimal requirements, offering generic alt text or basic high-contrast mode, while ignoring deeper issues of navigability and interpretability for screen reader users.
“Many dashboards comply only with minimal requirements, offering, for example, a generic alt text for a chart or a basic high-contrast mode, while ignoring deeper issues of navigability and interpretability for screen reader users.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In practice, many IoT solutions ignore WCAG guideline or implement it in a minimal way.
“In practice, however, many IoT solutions ignore this guideline or implement it in a minimal way.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most sensor data are numeric and generic.
“Since most sensor data are numeric and generic, this mainly involves stripping out or abstracting any labels that might contain names or specific locations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grafana has keyboard accessibility gaps: some controls or panels cannot be fully used via keyboard alone.
“Keyboard accessibility is another known gap-some controls or panels cannot be fully used via keyboard alone, though work is underway to fix these (adding skip-to-content links, fixing focus traps, etc.).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grafana supports multiple data presentation formats (graphs, tables, single-value stats, text markdown).
“Grafana supports multiple data presentation formats (it has panel types for graphs, tables, single-value stats, text markdown, etc.)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grafana does not automatically produce synchronized narrative descriptions.
“but it does not automatically produce synchronized narrative descriptions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grafana requires manual effort to meet even basic accessibility standards.
“Grafana, which requires manual effort to meet even basic accessibility standards”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grafana does not have any concept of human-in-the-loop accessibility verification built into the platform.
“Grafana does not have any concept of human-in-the-loop accessibility verification built into the platform.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Azimuth supports charts, structured text, and underlying tables, covering multiple modalities.
“Azimuth supports charts, structured text, and underlying tables, covering multiple modalities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Azimuth does not provide AI narrative; the text is formulaic.
“One thing it does not provide is AI narrative-the text is formulaic-but it still ensures that the information conveyed by visuals is also available in textual form.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Azimuth generates rule-based textual summaries from static dashboard specifications.
“Azimuth, which generates rule-based textual summaries from static dashboard specifications”
The paper relies on this without support.
Azimuth's model is to generate accessible dashboards automatically from a specification.
“Azimuth's model is to generate accessible dashboards automatically from a specification.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Azimuth does not have a dedicated step for human validation of generated textual descriptions.
“There is not a dedicated step for human validation of the generated textual descriptions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI-generated textual summaries may introduce bias, overgeneralizations, or contextual inaccuracies that could have consequences in high-stakes environments.
“AI-generated textual summaries-though designed to be informative and screen-reader friendly-may introduce bias, overgeneralizations, or contextual inaccuracies that could have consequences in high-stakes environments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Automated accessibility tools cannot assess contextual comprehension, navigational intuitiveness, or cognitive load.
“They cannot assess contextual comprehension, navigational intuitiveness, or cognitive load.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The metrics align with those commonly used in prior accessibility studies.
“These metrics align with those commonly used in prior accessibility studies, supporting meaningful comparison with existing research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In various professional settings, inclusive access means that professionals who rely on assistive technologies can act on time-critical information as independently and confidently as their sighted peers.
“In each setting, inclusive access means that professionals who rely on assistive technologies can act on time-critical information as independently and confidently as their sighted peers.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the universities examined had publicly documented the use of accessibility-focused AI systems or tools.
“Despite widespread recognition of AI's potential to assist with alt text generation [42], content remediation and real-time accessibility insights [5], and scientific visualizations accessibility [5,64], none of the universities examined had publicly documented the use of accessibility-focused AI systems or tools.”
From Toward universal access to information: an analysis of digital accessibility policy readiness in U.S. public universities (2026) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Latest temperature exceeds the stated recent range
MinorThe accessible summary gives a current temperature of 23.66 °C, but its recent-trends summary says temperature varied only up to 23.48 °C over the past 50 minutes. A current reading should fall within that recent period.
“Temperature: 23.66 • C, Humidity: 47.32%, Air Quality Index (AQI) [47]: 72 (Moderate), Energy Consumption: 4.16 kWh”
“Over the past 50 min, the temperature varied between 19.89 • C and 23.48 • C.”
Interface is described as both single-page and separate server-rendered views
MinorThe architecture calls the front end a single-page interface, whereas the implementation says each view is a separate route returning its own Blade template.
“the AccessiDashboard front-end is implemented as a single-page web interface”
“On the server side, each view (bullet list, data grid, analysis) is a separate route that returns the appropriate Blade template.”
Prototype descriptions are claimed to update automatically but were triggered manually
MinorThe comparison claims that AI descriptions are updated as data changes. The implementation section says generation in the prototype was manually triggered and automatic updating was only a possibility.
“These AI-driven descriptions go well beyond static alt text and are updated as data changes.”
“For the prototype, we manually triggered the generation for demonstration, but it could be automated to update, say, every hour or whenever a significant change is detected.”
Cites
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Pradhan, A., Mehta, K., & Findlater, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174033 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
AI-based personalized E-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions
Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3193938 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
A Review of Current Trends, Techniques, and Challenges in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Patil, R., & Gudivada, V. N. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14052074 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
A Review of Current Trends, Techniques, and Challenges in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Patil, R., & Gudivada, A. V. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202402.0357.v1 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Eviza: A Natural Language Interface for Visual Analysis
Setlur, V., Battersby, S. E., Tory, M., Gossweiler, R., & Chang, A. X. (2016) · Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/2984511.2984588 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Kumar, M., Kumar, A., Verma, S., Bhattacharya, P., Ghimire, D., Kim, S.-H., & Hosen, A. S. M. S. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12092050 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Smart Home and Internet of Things: A Bibliometric Study
Choi, W., Kim, J., Lee, S., & Park, E. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126908 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Head-Mounted Display Visualizations to Support Sound Awareness for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Jain, D., Findlater, L., Gilkeson, J., Holland, B., Duraiswami, R., Zotkin, D., Vogler, C., & Froehlich, J. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702393 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The Air Quality Index (AQI) in historical and analytical perspective a tutorial review
Horn, S. A., & Dasgupta, P. Κ. (2023) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125260 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
RESTful API Testing Methodologies: Rationale, Challenges, and Solution Directions
Ehsan, A., Abuhaliqa, M. A. M. E., Catal, C., & Mishra, D. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12094369 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Rich Screen Reader Experiences for Accessible Data Visualization
Zong, J., Lee, C., Lundgard, A., Jang, J., Hajas, D., & Satyanarayan, A. (2022) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.14519 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Digital Design Marginalization: New Perspectives on Designing Inclusive Interfaces
Sin, J., Franz, R. L., Munteanu, C., & Neves, B. B. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445180 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Othman, A., Dhouib, A., & Nasser Al Jabor, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments · doi:10.1145/3594806.3596542 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0
Craig, J. V., & Pemberton, S. (2014) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Fan, D., Fay Siu, A., Rao, H., Kim, G. S.-H., Vazquez, X., Greco, L., O'Modhrain, S., & Follmer, S. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3557899 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Internet of Things (IoT) Adoption: Challenges and Barriers
Alenizi, A. S., & Al-Karawi, K. A. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_20 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Classifying Model-View-Controller Software Applications Using Self-Organizing Maps
Guamán, D., Delgado, S., & Pérez, J. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3066348 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cloud Data Breach Disclosures: the Consumer and their Personally Identifiable Information (PII)?
Kolevski, D., Michael, K., Abbas, R., & Freeman, M. B. (2021) · IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW) · doi:10.1109/21cw48944.2021.9532579 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Safe and Secure Communication Using SSL/TLS
Kumar, D. D., Mukharzee, J. D., Reddy, C. V. D., & Rajagopal, S. M. (2024) · International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI) · doi:10.1109/esci59607.2024.10497224 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Privacy by Design and Software Engineering
Andrade, V. C., Gomes, R. D., Reinehr, S., Freitas, C. O. D. A., & Malucelli, A. (2022) · Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (SBQS) · doi:10.1145/3571473.3571480 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A large-scale analysis of HTTPS deployments: Challenges, solutions, and recommendations
Hu, Q., Asghar, M. R., & Brownlee, N. (2020) · Journal of Computer Security · doi:10.3233/jcs-200070 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Azimuth: Designing Accessible Dashboards for Screen Reader Users
Srinivasan, A., Harshbarger, T., Hilliker, D., & Mankoff, J. (2023) · The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3597638.3608405 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A Survey on Enhancing Image Captioning with Advanced Strategies and Techniques
Zou, B., Thobhani, A., Kui, X., Abdussalam, A., Asim, M., Shah, S., & ELAffendi, M. A. (2025) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2025.059192 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Improving Security, Privacy, and Trust in Cloud Computing
(2024) · Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1431-9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Schicchi, D., & Taibi, D. (2024) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67351-1_24 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The effects of matching/mismatching cognitive styles in E-learning
Wu, C., Tang, K.-D., Peng, K.-L., Huang, Y., & Liu, C.-H. S. (2024) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2024.2434741 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Research on HTML5 Responsive Web Front-end Development Based on Bootstrap Framework
Cheng, D. (2024) · International Conference on Computer Information Science and Application Technology (CISAT) · doi:10.1109/cisat62382.2024.10695228 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Data Visualizations for the Internet of Things Operational Dashboard
Svalina, A., Pibernik, J., Dolić, J., & Mandić, L. (2021) · 2021 International Symposium ELMAR · doi:10.1109/elmar52657.2021.9550826 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Verhoeff, T. T. (2024) · OLYMPIADS IN INFORMATICS · doi:10.15388/ioi.2024.09 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
(2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86044-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AccessiLearnAI: An Accessibility-First, AI-Powered E-Learning Platform for Inclusive Education
Stelea, G. A., Robu, D., & Sandu, F. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091125 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine Learning for Adaptive Accessible User Interfaces: Overview and Applications
Kristić, M., Zakarija, I., Škopljanac-Mačina, F., & Car, Ž. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app152312538 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cudjoe, E. K., & Asilevi, P. A. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-026-01379-8
Context-Aware Text Generation for Interactive Dashboards via Multimodal LLM Orchestration
He, H., Wang, S., Hongwei, W., Wang, X., Zhao, Y., & Diao, L. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE) · doi:10.1109/icaice68195.2025.11382347
AI-Enhanced Color Contrast Checker for WCAG Oriented Real-Time Accessibility Evaluation
Khan, D. M., Shahid, Z., & Khan, A. (2026) · International Conference on AI Innovations and Industry (ICAIII) · doi:10.1109/icaiii69475.2026.11521214
- Authors
- Stelea, G. A., Sangeorzan, L., & Enache-David, N.
- Affiliations
- Transilvania University of Brașov (RO)
- Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania
- Corresponding author
- Stelea, George Alex
- Venue
- Future Internet
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-06-21
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 274
- ISSN
- 1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411568410
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 30.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Future Internet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Transilvania University of Brașov
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- visual impairment, screen readers, WAI-ARIA, large language models, privacy by design, inclusive design, sensor data visualization, cognitive load
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review