Cited by 8Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementUsability and User Interface Design

Assessing the Accessibility and Usability of Web Archives for Blind Users

Sunkara, Mohan, Nayak, Akshay Kolgar, Kalari, Sandeep, Kodandaram, Satwik Ram, Jayarathna, Sampath, Lee, Hae-Na, Ashok, Vikas·2024·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_12

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The state of web accessibility remains critically poor.

    “Despite the enforcement of legal frameworks such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [72] and deep ethical obligations to foster inclusivity, the state of web accessibility remains critically poor [39, 69].”

    From A Multi-Agent Framework for Accessible Web Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sunkara, M., Nayak, A. K., Kalari, S., Kodandaram, S. R., Jayarathna, S., Lee, H.-N., & Ashok, V.
Affiliations
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sunkara, Mohan
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2024
Pages
203-221
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4402827483
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5
FWCI
4.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
web archives, web accessibility, blind users, screen readers, usability, digital preservation, text alternatives, accessibility evaluation, assistive technology, accessible design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review