Cited by 11Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

InSupport: Proxy Interface for Enabling Efficient Non-Visual Interaction with Web Data Records

Open access
Ferdous, Javedul, Lee, Hae-Na, Jayarathna, Sampath, Ashok, Vikas·2022·27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces

Abstract

Interaction with web data records typically involves accessing auxiliary webpage segments such as filters, sort options, search form, and multi-page links. As these segments are usually scattered all across the screen, it is arduous and tedious for blind users who rely on screen readers to access the segments, given that content navigation with screen readers is predominantly one-dimensional, despite the available support for skipping content via either special keyboard shortcuts or selective navigation. The extant techniques to overcome inefficient web screen reader interaction have mostly focused on general web content navigation, and as such they provide little to no support for data record-specific interaction activities such as filtering and sorting – activities that are equally important for enabling quick and easy access to the desired data records. To fill this void, we present InSupport, a browser extension that: (i) employs custom-built machine learning models to automatically extract auxiliary segments on any webpage containing data records, and (ii) provides an instantly accessible proxy one-stop interface for easily navigating the extracted segments using basic screen reader shortcuts. An evaluation study with 14 blind participants showed significant improvement in usability with InSupport, driven by increased reduction in interaction time and the number of key presses, compared to state-of-the-art solutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3490099.3511126

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]3. Tousif Ahmed, Patrick Shaffer, Kay Connelly, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2016. Addressing physical safety, security, and privacy for people with visual impairments. In Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2016). 341-354.
  2. [9]9. Ali Selman Aydin, Shirin Feiz, Vikas Ashok, and IV Ramakrishnan. 2020. SaIL: saliency-driven injection of ARIA landmarks. In Proceedings of the 25th Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 111-115.
  3. [19]19. John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferdous, J., Lee, H.-N., Jayarathna, S., & Ashok, V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, United States
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Old Dominion University (US)
Venue
27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-03-22
Pages
49-62
OpenAlex
W4221080967
Cited by
11
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (publishedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1936027, 2113485, 1805076)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01EY030085, R01HD097188)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY030085)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD097188)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
screen readers, blind users, browser extension, content navigation, assistive technology, usability evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review