Cited by 33D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Boost Your NeRF: A Model-Agnostic Mixture of Experts Framework for High Quality and Efficient Rendering

Open access
Di Sario, Francesco, Renzulli, Riccardo, Tartaglione, Enzo, Grangetto, Marco·2025·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-73010-8_11

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By optimizing decisions and policies through interactive feedback loops, reinforcement learning has established itself as a crucial tool for training AI systems in scenarios demanding high adaptability and precision in decision-making.

    “By optimizing decisions and policies through interactive feedback loops, reinforcement learning has established itself as a crucial tool for training AI systems in scenarios that demand a high degree of adaptability and precision in decision-making [184], [185].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Sario, F., Renzulli, R., Tartaglione, E., & Grangetto, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Télécom Paris (FR)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2024-11-10
Volume
15141
Pages
176-192
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4404199599
Cited by
3
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
neural radiance fields, mixture of experts, rendering quality, scene decomposition, scene reconstruction, model-agnostic framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review