Cited by 5Ethics and Social Impacts of AIMisinformation and Its ImpactsTechnology's Impact on Media

Ethical Considerations in AI-Generated Content on Social Media

Medhat, Mervat, Ayoub, Layal W., Daher, Manar, Mohamed, Khaled M.·2025·Studies in Big Data

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-83911-5_52

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional classifiers struggle with automatic feature extraction, processing large data volumes, and understanding word meanings and semantics associated with cyberbullying.

    “Traditional classifiers struggle with automatic feature extraction, processing large data volumes, and understanding word meanings and semantics associated with cyberbullying [124].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medhat, M., Ayoub, L. W., Daher, M., & Mohamed, K. M.
Affiliations
Ajman University (AE)
Corresponding author
Medhat, Mervat
Venue
Studies in Big Data
Published
2025
Pages
611-620
ISSN
  • 2197-6503 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-6511
OpenAlex
W4409518580
Cited by
5
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
16.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in big data (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology's Impact on Media
Keywords
AI-generated content, social media, ethics, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, misinformation, public trust, privacy, AI regulation, fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review