The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making
Abstract
This study proposes a typology of reasons why people substantially delay important consumer decisions. The delay reasons we study are drawn from delay typologies identified in other contexts as well as from the product diffusion literature. Two studies reported here examine why subjects delay consumer decisions. These support most of the reasons in the proposed typology, while some unanticipated delay reasons also emerge. We find that the delay reasons are related to the reasons consumers stop delaying, a process that we call delay closure, and are also related to the amount of time that consumers spend in different stages of the decision-making process. A final study supports a conceptual framework to classify these delay reasons based on the two dimensions of internal versus external locus of causation, and whether the purpose of delay is related to the decision or to unrelated activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503 · Cited by 1,788
Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments
Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172601 · Cited by 1,575
Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach
Folkes, V. S. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208978 · Cited by 1,353
External Search Effort: An Investigation Across Several Product Categories
Beatty, S. E., & Smith, S. M. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209095 · Cited by 1,302
At last, my research article on procrastination
Lay, C. H. (1986) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3 · Cited by 1,175
Shugan, S. M. (1980) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208799 · Cited by 944
The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions
Simonson, I. (1992) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209290 · Cited by 801
Preferences for sequences of outcomes.
Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.1.91 · Cited by 767
Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load
Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Kohn, C. A. (1974) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377401100106 · Cited by 709
Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior
Wallsten, T. S., Einhorn, H. J., Ebbesen, E. B., Konecni, V. J., & Corbin, R. B. (1979) · doi:10.21236/ada078481 · Cited by 667
Cited by
Consumer Preference for a No‐Choice Option
Dhar, R. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209506 · Cited by 992
Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion?
Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80105-5 · Cited by 894
Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis
Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002 · Cited by 858
Consumer response to stockouts
Fitzsimons, G. J. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314323 · Cited by 514
Tsiros, M., & Heilman, C. M. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.114.60762 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenleaf, E. A., & Lehmann, D. R.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-186
- OpenAlex
- W2146282314
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-88067-4_10
- The paper
- Greenleaf, E. A., & Lehmann, D. R. (1995). Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88067-4_10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.