The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Qualitative Study
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Besides, minimal research has been done to conduct systematic studies on the circumstances in which the application of AI can further improve or limit the development of critical thinking in nursing students.”
From HOW AI TOOLS (LIKE CHATGPT/GEMINI) AFFECT CRITICAL THINKING IN NURSING STUDENTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 · Cited by 2,205
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13090856 · Cited by 877
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001 · Cited by 535
Harrer, S. (2023) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512 · Cited by 480
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4404380 · Cited by 425
Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice
Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111109 · Cited by 414
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 · Cited by 410
Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education
Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2293431 · Cited by 301
Kurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., Zailer, G., & Barak-Medina, E. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14050503 · Cited by 181
ChatGPT, An Artificial Intelligence Chatbot, Is Impacting Medical Literature
Lubowitz, J. H. (2023) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.015 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Crawford, J., Cowling, M., Allen, K.A.: Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 20, 2 (2023)
Cited by
HOW AI TOOLS (LIKE CHATGPT/GEMINI) AFFECT CRITICAL THINKING IN NURSING STUDENTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Din, A. L. (2026) · Journal of Medical & Health Sciences Review · doi:10.65035/650ytk03 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Janahi, Y. M., & Sakti, M. R. P.
- Affiliations
- University College of Bahrain (BH)
- Corresponding author
- Janahi, Yusuf Mohamed
- Venue
- Studies in Systems, Decision and Control
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 1135-1147
- ISSN
- 2198-4182 (ISSN-L)
- 2198-4190
- OpenAlex
- W4415320770
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
- Locations
- Studies in systems, decision and control (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- generative AI, ChatGPT, academic integrity, higher education, student guidance, critical thinking, moral reasoning, AI in teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges and Opportunities of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Qualitative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-96641-5_96
- The paper
- Janahi, Y. M., & Sakti, M. R. P. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Qualitative Study. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96641-5_96
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
