The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Potential of Transdisciplinarity
Abstract
A transformation is occurring in the relationship of science and society. A new mode of knowledge production is at the heart of this transformation. Much of the thrust of innovation is coming from new links between traditionally segmented producers and users of knowledge. Contextualization of research around the interests of stakeholders fosters a more “socially robust” knowledge that transgresses disciplinary and institutional boundaries. The ancient Greek agora is a model for a new transdisciplinary forum. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The participating stakeholders' learning and the development of socially robust orientations (Gibbons and Nowotny 2001) have been in the foreground.”
From Transdisciplinarity: science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbons and Nowotny 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 1,206
Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality
Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011 · Cited by 613
“In the social context, calls for interaction with an increasingly engaged populace [1,6,7] are driving research in more participatory, consultative and deliberate directions [5,8].”
BackgroundVogel, C. H., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E., & Dabelko, G. D. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002 · Cited by 589
Methodology of Transdisciplinarity–Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity
Nicolescu, B. (2010) · Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science · doi:10.22545/2010/0009 · Cited by 402
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2007) · Clinical and investigative medicine · doi:10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbons, M., & Nowotny, H.
- Affiliations
- Association of Commonwealth Universities (GB)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Basel
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 67-80
- OpenAlex
- W129870078
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 30.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Birkhäuser Basel eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Keywords
- transdisciplinarity, science and society, knowledge production, stakeholder engagement, interdisciplinary research, institutional boundaries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review