The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: Statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances
Abstract
Relatedness between individuals as well as evolutionary relationships between populations can be studied by comparing genotypic similarities between individuals. When hypervariable loci are used to describe genotypes, it is shown that both of these problems can be approached with a unified theory based on allele sharing between individuals. The distributions of the number of shared alleles between individuals indicate their kin relationships. Extending this, we obtain statistics for genetic distances between populations based on average number of alleles shared between individuals within and between two different populations. Traditional statistical inferential procedure can be used to establish specific kinship relationships between individuals. We derive estimates of the number of hypervariable loci needed for a specified reliability of such an inference. Evolutionary dynamics of genetic distance statistics based on allele sharing is also studied. It shows that such measures of genetic distances remain linear with the time of divergence for a period comparable to that of the gene frequency-based measures of genetic distances. Statistical properties of measures based on allele sharing establish that for using such summary statistics it is not necessary to know the full characteristics of all loci used. It is enough to know the degree of heterozygosity per locus and the number of loci. Therefore, in principle, this approach can also be used for DNA fingerprinting data in the studies of relatedness between individuals as well as between populations. The possible compromising features of multilocus DNA fingerprinting data are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Population bottlenecks in Polynesia revealed by minisatellites
Flint, J., Boyce, A. J., Martinson, J. J., & Clegg, J. B. (1989) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00285167 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Population Structure and Eigenanalysis
Patterson, N., Price, A. L., & Reich, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · Cited by 5,280
Cornuet, J.-M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Estoup, A., & Solignac, M. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/153.4.1989 · Cited by 1,199
Molecular genetics and the stock concept in fisheries
Carvalho, G. R., & Hauser, L. (1994) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/bf00042908 · Cited by 542
ESTOUP, A., SOLIGNAC, M., CORNUET, J. M., GOUDET, J., & SCHOLL, A. (1996) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00288.x · Cited by 304
Accurate Inference of Relationships in Sib-Pair Linkage Studies
Boehnke, M., & Cox, N. J. (1997) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/514862 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakraborty, R., & Jin, L.
- Venue
- DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Basel
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 153-175
- OpenAlex
- W153126036
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: Statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-0348-8583-6_14
- The paper
- Chakraborty, R., & Jin, L. (1993). A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: Statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8583-6_14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.