The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic differentiation of continental and island populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Europe
Abstract
Ten microsatellite loci and a partial sequence of the COII mitochondrial gene were used to investigate genetic differentiation in B. terrestris, a bumble bee of interest for its high‐value crop pollination. The analysis included eight populations from the European continent, five from Mediterranean islands (six subspecies altogether) and one from Tenerife (initially described as a colour form of B. terrestris but recently considered as a separate species, B. canariensis). Eight of the 10 microsatellite loci displayed high levels of polymorphism in most populations. In B. terrestris populations, the total number of alleles detected per polymorphic locus ranged from 3 to 16, with observed allelic diversity from 3.8 ± 0.5 to 6.5 ± 1.4 and average calculated heterozygosities from 0.41 ± 0.09 to 0.65 ± 0.07. B. canariensis showed a significantly lower average calculated heterozygosity (0.12 ± 0.08) and observed allelic diversity (1.5 ± 0.04) as compared to both continental and island populations of B. terrestris. No significant differentiation was found among populations of B. terrestris from the European continent. In contrast, island populations were all significantly and most of them strongly differentiated from continental populations. B. terrestris mitochondrial DNA is characterized by a low nucleotide diversity: 0.18%± 0.07%, 0.20%± 0.04% and 0.27%± 0.04% for the continental populations, the island populations and all populations together, respectively. The only haplotype found in the Tenerife population differs by a single nucleotide substitution from the most common continental haplotype of B. terrestris. This situation, identical to that of Tyrrhenian islands populations and quite different from that of B. lucorum (15 substitutions between terrestris and lucorum mtDNA) casts doubts on the species status of B. canariensis. The large genetic distance between the Tenerife and B. terrestris populations estimated from microsatellite data result, most probably, from a severe bottleneck in the Canary island population. Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA data call for the protection of the island populations of B. terrestris against importation of bumble bees of foreign origin which are used as crop pollinators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ESTIMATING F -STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · Cited by 19,066
GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population Genetics Software for Exact Tests and Ecumenicism
Raymond, M., & Rousset, F. (1995) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573 · Cited by 15,397
ESTIMATION OF AVERAGE HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE FROM A SMALL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS
Nei, M. (1978) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/89.3.583 · Cited by 11,381
Genetic Distance between Populations
Nei, M. (1972) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282771 · Cited by 9,731
FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics
Goudet, J. (1995) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627 · Cited by 7,635
Self-citationA measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.
Slatkin, M. (1995) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/139.1.457 · Cited by 3,664
THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS
Nei, M., Maruyama, T., & Chakraborty, R. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x · Cited by 3,498
SKREDE, I., EIDESEN, P. B., PORTELA, R. P., & BROCHMANN, C. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02908.x · Cited by 2,746
Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures
(2018) · Phylogenetic Inference, Selection Theory, and History of Science · doi:10.1017/9781316276259.010 · Cited by 2,260
High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites
Bowcock, A. M., Ruiz-Linares, A., Tomfohrde, J., Minch, E., Kidd, J. R., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368455a0 · Cited by 1,850
Cited by
Decline and conservation of bumble bees
Goulson, D., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454 · Cited by 1,183
Luikart, G., & Cornuet, J.-M. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96388.x · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationLozier, J. D., Strange, J. P., & Koch, J. B. (2013) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-013-0498-3 · Cited by 61
Goulson, D., Kaden, J. C., Lepais, O., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B. (2011) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-011-0190-4 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- ESTOUP, A., SOLIGNAC, M., CORNUET, J. M., GOUDET, J., & SCHOLL, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-31
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2159785903
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic differentiation of continental and island populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00288.x
- The paper
- ESTOUP, A., SOLIGNAC, M., CORNUET, J. M., GOUDET, J., & SCHOLL, A. (1996). Genetic differentiation of continental and island populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Europe. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00288.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.