The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality of Experience: Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Existing literature on QoE focuses mostly on subjective human feedback of applications [21].”
From QoE in IoT: a vision, survey and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–155 of 155
Guse, D., Weiß, B., Haase, F., et al. (2017) · Quality and User Experience · doi:10.1007/s41233-017-0008-3 · Cited by 4
Self-citationEeg Based Visual Classification With Multi-Feature Joint Learning
Ma, X., Duan, Y., Hu, S., et al. (2021) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip42928.2021.9506633 · Cited by 4
Review of recent standardization activities in speech quality of experience
Möller, S., & Köster, F. (2017) · Quality and User Experience · doi:10.1007/s41233-017-0012-7 · Cited by 4
Self-citationOptimize Elasticity in Cloud Computing using Container Based Virtualization
Shahzad, M. A., Aslam, M. S., Sajjad, W., & Imran, M. A. (2019) · International Journal of Innovations in Science and Technology · doi:10.33411/ijist/2020020101 · Cited by 4
Estimation of quality of experience (QoE) in e-Health ecosystems
Rojas-Mendizabal, V. A., Serrano-Santoyo, A., Conte-Galván, R., Villarreal‐Reyes, S., & Rivera-Rodríguez, R. (2017) · Ingeniería e Investigación · doi:10.15446/ing.investig.v37n2.57664 · Cited by 4
Yin, D., Li, T., & Liao, Z. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/7940645 · Cited by 4
Impact of the Stimulus Presentation Structure on Subjective Video Quality Assessment
Konaszyński, T., Juszka, D., & Leszczuk, M. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12224593 · Cited by 3
Towards attack-resilient communications for smart grids with software-defined networking
Wu, Y., & Wei, J. (2017) · IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2017.8273961 · Cited by 3
Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain Congestion
claffy, K., Clark, D. D., Bauer, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.0001 · Cited by 3
Towards Better Quality of Experience in HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Taraghi, B., Haack, S. Z., & Timmerer, C. (2022) · International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) · doi:10.1109/sitis57111.2022.00096 · Cited by 3
Juszka, D., & Papir, Z. (2016) · Przegląd Telekomunikacyjny + Wiadomości Telekomunikacyjne · doi:10.15199/59.2016.6.13 · Cited by 3
Holistic Quality Assessment of Mediated Immersive Multisensory Social Communication
Toet, A., Mioch, T., Gunkel, S. N. B., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62655-6_13 · Cited by 3
Recent Advances on 3D Video Coding Technology: HEVC Standardization Framework
Milovanovic, D. A., Kukolj, D., & Bojkovic, Z. S. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-4026-4_4 · Cited by 3
Vijayakumar, S., Corcoran, P., Flynn, R., et al. (2022) · ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) · doi:10.1145/3524273.3533935 · Cited by 3
Eye Tracking and Human Influence Factors’ Impact on Quality of Experience of Mobile Gaming
Nawaz, O., Khatibi, S., Sheikh, M. N., et al. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16110420 · Cited by 2
The Regressive QoE Model for VoLTE
Yang, C. (2017) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) · doi:10.1109/waina.2017.95 · Cited by 2
Joint performance optimization of primary networks and cognitive radio networks
Dai, J., & Wang, S. (2017) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc.2017.7997384 · Cited by 2
Najjar, A., Boissier, O., & Picard, G. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_1 · Cited by 3
Leszczuk, M., & Janowski, L. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72254-8_27 · Cited by 2
New Recommendation for Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Recognition TasksPreprint
Leszczuk, M., & Janowski, L. (2021) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0435.v1 · Cited by 2
Towards Computing Quality of Experience(QoE) in Social Internet of Vehicles(SIoV)
Alharthi, A. M., Halima, N. B., Alqarni, A., & Khan, M. A. (2025) · International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets) · doi:10.1109/smartnets65254.2025.11106387 · Cited by 1
Exploration of the Effect of Automatic Camera Tracking for Teleconferencing
Götzl, C., Immohr, F., Raake, A., et al. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences · doi:10.1145/3788851.3815030 · Cited by 1
Self-citationStankowski, A., Varab, D., Clarke, M., Gschwendtner, P., & Avramidis, E. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3813061 · Cited by 2
Investigation of Video Quality Dimensions for Different Type of Video Content
Schiffner, F. R., Vladimir, B., & Möller, S. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM) · doi:10.1109/ism.2018.00029 · Cited by 1
Self-citationQuality Factors and Feature Space of Cloud Gaming Services
Schmidt, S. (2022) · T-labs series in telecommunication services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06011-3_2 · Cited by 1
Subramanian, S., Moor, K. D., & Koniuch, K. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48306-6_24 · Cited by 1
Quality of Experience From the Viewpoint of Electronic Logistics Network
Altin, E., Ozel, H. H., & Can, Y. S. (2018) · doi:10.1109/ubmk.2018.8566453 · Cited by 1
Consideration of Relationship between Human Preference and Pulse Wave Derived from Brain Activity
Mami, K., Niigaki, Y., & Horita, Y. (2019) · IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1587/transfun.e102.a.1250 · Cited by 1
Related Work and Theoretical Background
Schiffner, F. R. (2020) · T-labs series in telecommunication services · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56570-1_2 · Cited by 1
Zadtootaghaj, S. (2022) · T-labs series in telecommunication services · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98249-2_2 · Cited by 1
Quality by Design and Innovation
Yang, K. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119932475.ch3 · Cited by 1
Analyse et modélisation de la qualité perçue des applications de visiophonie
Saidi, I. (2018) · doi:10.70675/5d295a30z98ecz4e27z9badz314b64828434 · Cited by 1
The influence of user decisions on subjective quality assessment ratings
Sackl, A., & Schatz, R. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops · doi:10.1109/iccw.2015.7247423
Motivation und Zielsetzung, Qualität und Gebrauchstauglichkeit
Möller, S. (2017) · Quality Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56046-4_1
Self-citationStandards for diagnosing the quality of transmitted speech and their improvements
Köster, F., & Möller, S. (2014) · IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2014.7063518
Self-citationNdiaye, M., Quinquis, C., Larabi, M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2039291
Relationship between compressed image quality and Quality of Experience for wireless file sharing
Lionnie, R., Pristiawan, A., Prasetyo, B. T., et al. (2016) · International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/iac.2016.7905682
Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain Congestion
claffy, K., Clark, D. D., Bauer, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.10.1.0001
Mitchell, J., Kanwal, N., & de Quincey, E. (2022) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2022.22
Iterative transfer learning with large unlabeled datasets for no-reference image quality assessment
Bahnemiri, S. G., Pnomarenko, M., & Egiazarian, K. (2024) · Applied Computing and Intelligence · doi:10.3934/aci.2024007
Kojić, T. (2024) · T-labs series in telecommunication services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75530-9_4
Kojić, T. (2024) · T-labs series in telecommunication services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75530-9_2
Context-Aware QoE for Mobility-Driven Applications Through Dynamic Surveys
Nawaz, O., Zhou, Y., Khatibi, S., & Fiedler, M. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15120797
Evaluating Immersion in Digital Video Using EEG and Subjective Measures: A Pilot Study
Doumanis, I., Economou, D., & Tsioutas, K. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82633-7_23
Skin Conductance-Based Quality of Experience Assessment in Mobility as a Service
D’Arco, M., Manzo, R., Moccaldi, N., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/memea65319.2025.11068059
Quality of Experience Based Trustworthiness for LLMs : New Approach and Use Case
Heroucha, A., Derradji, R., Abreu, T., Labiod, M. A., & Mellouk, A. (2025) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc52391.2025.11161285
Balancing Privacy and Quality of Experience in VR: Towards A Research Agenda
Sivelle, C., Palma, D., & Moor, K. D. (2025) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex65720.2025.11219901
Dutta, A., Saeed, M. T. M., Arawade, S., et al. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15081666
PADAM: Perceptual Audio Defect Assessment Model
Mackin, A., Khandelwal, P., Haralampieva, V., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11462818
Adaptive Multidimensional Model for User Interface Quality Assessment
Naydenova, I., Kovacheva, Z. S., & Georgiev, I. K. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18050261
Quality of Multimedia Experience Meets Machine Intelligence
Zhou, W., Amirpour, H., Hossfeld, T., et al. (2026) · ACM SIGMultimedia Records · doi:10.1145/3811013.3811016
Investigating Quality of Experience and Performance in AR-Based Skill Training for Gaelic Football
Warkocki, P., Murray, N., & Keighrey, C. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences · doi:10.1145/3788851.3815055
A Survey of Emerging Concepts and Challenges for QoE Management of Multimedia Services
Skorin-Kapov, L., Varela, M., Hoßfeld, T., & Chen, K.-T. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications · doi:10.1145/3176648 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Möller, S., & Raake, A.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2192-2810 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2829
- OpenAlex
- W2500671607
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- T-labs series in telecommunication services (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Multimedia Communication and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- quality of experience, multimedia applications, telecommunications services, user experience, service quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review