Cited by 116Image and Video Quality AssessmentNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

A Survey of Emerging Concepts and Challenges for QoE Management of Multimedia Services

Skorin-Kapov, Lea, Varela, Martín, Hoßfeld, Tobias, Chen, Kuan-Ta·2018·ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications

Abstract

Quality of Experience (QoE) has received much attention over the past years and has become a prominent issue for delivering services and applications. A significant amount of research has been devoted to understanding, measuring, and modelling QoE for a variety of media services. The next logical step is to actively exploit that accumulated knowledge to improve and manage the quality of multimedia services, while at the same time ensuring efficient and cost-effective network operations. Moreover, with many different players involved in the end-to-end service delivery chain, identifying the root causes of QoE impairments and finding effective solutions for meeting the end users’ requirements and expectations in terms of service quality is a challenging and complex problem. In this article, we survey state-of-the-art findings and present emerging concepts and challenges related to managing QoE for networked multimedia services. Going beyond a number of previously published survey articles addressing the topic of QoE management, we address QoE management in the context of ongoing developments, such as the move to softwarized networks, the exploitation of big data analytics and machine learning, and the steady rise of new and immersive services (e.g., augmented and virtual reality). We address the implications of such paradigm shifts in terms of new approaches in QoE modeling and the need for novel QoE monitoring and management infrastructures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3176648

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surveys [14,15] focused on QoE in multimedia IoT applications, which is determined based on how such applications are consumed by users.

    “In surveys such as [14,15], authors have focussed on QoE in multimedia IoT applications, which is determined based on how such applications are consumed by users.”

    From QoE in IoT: a vision, survey and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Existing studies do not provide insights into how network or service providers can utilize the capabilities of SDN and NFV for QoE management to meet end users' quality demands.

    “As such, these studies do not provide insights into how network or service providers can utilize the capabilities of SDN and NFV for QoE management (e.g., to achieve automation, programmability, flexibility, scalability and network control) to meet the end users' quality demands.”
  • Existing survey papers on QoE management do not explain how QoE can be improved or optimized using SDN and NFV.

    “However, the survey papers mentioned above do not explain how QoE can be improved or optimized using SDN and NFV.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skorin-Kapov, L., Varela, M., Hoßfeld, T., & Chen, K.-T.
Affiliations
  • University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Croatia
  • EXFO, Finland
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica (TW)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
Published
2018-04-30
Volume
14
Issue
2s
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 1551-6857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6865
OpenAlex
W2804559716
Cited by
116
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HO 4770/1-2 (DFG OekOnet))
  • Croatian Science Foundation (UIP-2014-09-5605)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
quality of experience, QoE management, QoE modeling, QoE monitoring, softwarized networks, big data analytics, machine learning, augmented reality, virtual reality, network operation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review